885 research outputs found

    Exploring Subexponential Parameterized Complexity of Completion Problems

    Get PDF
    Let F{\cal F} be a family of graphs. In the F{\cal F}-Completion problem, we are given a graph GG and an integer kk as input, and asked whether at most kk edges can be added to GG so that the resulting graph does not contain a graph from F{\cal F} as an induced subgraph. It appeared recently that special cases of F{\cal F}-Completion, the problem of completing into a chordal graph known as Minimum Fill-in, corresponding to the case of F={C4,C5,C6,}{\cal F}=\{C_4,C_5,C_6,\ldots\}, and the problem of completing into a split graph, i.e., the case of F={C4,2K2,C5}{\cal F}=\{C_4, 2K_2, C_5\}, are solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(klogk)nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log{k})}n^{O(1)}. The exploration of this phenomenon is the main motivation for our research on F{\cal F}-Completion. In this paper we prove that completions into several well studied classes of graphs without long induced cycles also admit parameterized subexponential time algorithms by showing that: - The problem Trivially Perfect Completion is solvable in parameterized subexponential time 2O(klogk)nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log{k})}n^{O(1)}, that is F{\cal F}-Completion for F={C4,P4}{\cal F} =\{C_4, P_4\}, a cycle and a path on four vertices. - The problems known in the literature as Pseudosplit Completion, the case where F={2K2,C4}{\cal F} = \{2K_2, C_4\}, and Threshold Completion, where F={2K2,P4,C4}{\cal F} = \{2K_2, P_4, C_4\}, are also solvable in time 2O(klogk)nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log{k})} n^{O(1)}. We complement our algorithms for F{\cal F}-Completion with the following lower bounds: - For F={2K2}{\cal F} = \{2K_2\}, F={C4}{\cal F} = \{C_4\}, F={P4}{\cal F} = \{P_4\}, and F={2K2,P4}{\cal F} = \{2K_2, P_4\}, F{\cal F}-Completion cannot be solved in time 2o(k)nO(1)2^{o(k)} n^{O(1)} unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our upper and lower bounds provide a complete picture of the subexponential parameterized complexity of F{\cal F}-Completion problems for F{2K2,C4,P4}{\cal F}\subseteq\{2K_2, C_4, P_4\}.Comment: 32 pages, 16 figures, A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the proceedings of STACS'1

    (Total) Vector Domination for Graphs with Bounded Branchwidth

    Full text link
    Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) of order nn and an nn-dimensional non-negative vector d=(d(1),d(2),,d(n))d=(d(1),d(2),\ldots,d(n)), called demand vector, the vector domination (resp., total vector domination) is the problem of finding a minimum SVS\subseteq V such that every vertex vv in VSV\setminus S (resp., in VV) has at least d(v)d(v) neighbors in SS. The (total) vector domination is a generalization of many dominating set type problems, e.g., the dominating set problem, the kk-tuple dominating set problem (this kk is different from the solution size), and so on, and its approximability and inapproximability have been studied under this general framework. In this paper, we show that a (total) vector domination of graphs with bounded branchwidth can be solved in polynomial time. This implies that the problem is polynomially solvable also for graphs with bounded treewidth. Consequently, the (total) vector domination problem for a planar graph is subexponential fixed-parameter tractable with respectto kk, where kk is the size of solution.Comment: 16 page

    Linear kernels for outbranching problems in sparse digraphs

    Full text link
    In the kk-Leaf Out-Branching and kk-Internal Out-Branching problems we are given a directed graph DD with a designated root rr and a nonnegative integer kk. The question is to determine the existence of an outbranching rooted at rr that has at least kk leaves, or at least kk internal vertices, respectively. Both these problems were intensively studied from the points of view of parameterized complexity and kernelization, and in particular for both of them kernels with O(k2)O(k^2) vertices are known on general graphs. In this work we show that kk-Leaf Out-Branching admits a kernel with O(k)O(k) vertices on H\mathcal{H}-minor-free graphs, for any fixed family of graphs H\mathcal{H}, whereas kk-Internal Out-Branching admits a kernel with O(k)O(k) vertices on any graph class of bounded expansion.Comment: Extended abstract accepted for IPEC'15, 27 page

    Beyond Bidimensionality: Parameterized Subexponential Algorithms on Directed Graphs

    Get PDF
    We develop two different methods to achieve subexponential time parameterized algorithms for problems on sparse directed graphs. We exemplify our approaches with two well studied problems. For the first problem, {\sc kk-Leaf Out-Branching}, which is to find an oriented spanning tree with at least kk leaves, we obtain an algorithm solving the problem in time 2O(klogk)n+nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k} \log k)} n+ n^{O(1)} on directed graphs whose underlying undirected graph excludes some fixed graph HH as a minor. For the special case when the input directed graph is planar, the running time can be improved to 2O(k)n+nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k})}n + n^{O(1)}. The second example is a generalization of the {\sc Directed Hamiltonian Path} problem, namely {\sc kk-Internal Out-Branching}, which is to find an oriented spanning tree with at least kk internal vertices. We obtain an algorithm solving the problem in time 2O(klogk)+nO(1)2^{O(\sqrt{k} \log k)} + n^{O(1)} on directed graphs whose underlying undirected graph excludes some fixed apex graph HH as a minor. Finally, we observe that for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, the {\sc kk-Directed Path} problem is solvable in time O((1+ϵ)knf(ϵ))O((1+\epsilon)^k n^{f(\epsilon)}), where ff is some function of \ve. Our methods are based on non-trivial combinations of obstruction theorems for undirected graphs, kernelization, problem specific combinatorial structures and a layering technique similar to the one employed by Baker to obtain PTAS for planar graphs

    Polynomial kernelization for removing induced claws and diamonds

    Full text link
    A graph is called (claw,diamond)-free if it contains neither a claw (a K1,3K_{1,3}) nor a diamond (a K4K_4 with an edge removed) as an induced subgraph. Equivalently, (claw,diamond)-free graphs can be characterized as line graphs of triangle-free graphs, or as linear dominoes, i.e., graphs in which every vertex is in at most two maximal cliques and every edge is in exactly one maximal clique. In this paper we consider the parameterized complexity of the (claw,diamond)-free Edge Deletion problem, where given a graph GG and a parameter kk, the question is whether one can remove at most kk edges from GG to obtain a (claw,diamond)-free graph. Our main result is that this problem admits a polynomial kernel. We complement this finding by proving that, even on instances with maximum degree 66, the problem is NP-complete and cannot be solved in time 2o(k)V(G)O(1)2^{o(k)}\cdot |V(G)|^{O(1)} unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fai

    Parameterized lower bound and NP-completeness of some HH-free Edge Deletion problems

    Get PDF
    For a graph HH, the HH-free Edge Deletion problem asks whether there exist at most kk edges whose deletion from the input graph GG results in a graph without any induced copy of HH. We prove that HH-free Edge Deletion is NP-complete if HH is a graph with at least two edges and HH has a component with maximum number of vertices which is a tree or a regular graph. Furthermore, we obtain that these NP-complete problems cannot be solved in parameterized subexponential time, i.e., in time 2o(k)GO(1)2^{o(k)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.Comment: 15 pages, COCOA 15 accepted pape
    corecore