1,887 research outputs found
Almost structural completeness; an algebraic approach
A deductive system is structurally complete if its admissible inference rules
are derivable. For several important systems, like modal logic S5, failure of
structural completeness is caused only by the underivability of passive rules,
i.e. rules that can not be applied to theorems of the system. Neglecting
passive rules leads to the notion of almost structural completeness, that
means, derivablity of admissible non-passive rules. Almost structural
completeness for quasivarieties and varieties of general algebras is
investigated here by purely algebraic means. The results apply to all
algebraizable deductive systems.
Firstly, various characterizations of almost structurally complete
quasivarieties are presented. Two of them are general: expressed with finitely
presented algebras, and with subdirectly irreducible algebras. One is
restricted to quasivarieties with finite model property and equationally
definable principal relative congruences, where the condition is verifiable on
finite subdirectly irreducible algebras.
Secondly, examples of almost structurally complete varieties are provided
Particular emphasis is put on varieties of closure algebras, that are known to
constitute adequate semantics for normal extensions of S4 modal logic. A
certain infinite family of such almost structurally complete, but not
structurally complete, varieties is constructed. Every variety from this family
has a finitely presented unifiable algebra which does not embed into any free
algebra for this variety. Hence unification in it is not unitary. This shows
that almost structural completeness is strictly weaker than projective
unification for varieties of closure algebras
An expressive completeness theorem for coalgebraic modal mu-calculi
Generalizing standard monadic second-order logic for Kripke models, we
introduce monadic second-order logic interpreted over coalgebras for an
arbitrary set functor. We then consider invariance under behavioral equivalence
of MSO-formulas. More specifically, we investigate whether the coalgebraic
mu-calculus is the bisimulation-invariant fragment of the monadic second-order
language for a given functor. Using automatatheoretic techniques and building
on recent results by the third author, we show that in order to provide such a
characterization result it suffices to find what we call an adequate uniform
construction for the coalgebraic type functor. As direct applications of this
result we obtain a partly new proof of the Janin-Walukiewicz Theorem for the
modal mu-calculus, avoiding the use of syntactic normal forms, and bisimulation
invariance results for the bag functor (graded modal logic) and all exponential
polynomial functors (including the "game functor"). As a more involved
application, involving additional non-trivial ideas, we also derive a
characterization theorem for the monotone modal mu-calculus, with respect to a
natural monadic second-order language for monotone neighborhood models.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1501.0721
Temporalized logics and automata for time granularity
Suitable extensions of the monadic second-order theory of k successors have
been proposed in the literature to capture the notion of time granularity. In
this paper, we provide the monadic second-order theories of downward unbounded
layered structures, which are infinitely refinable structures consisting of a
coarsest domain and an infinite number of finer and finer domains, and of
upward unbounded layered structures, which consist of a finest domain and an
infinite number of coarser and coarser domains, with expressively complete and
elementarily decidable temporal logic counterparts.
We obtain such a result in two steps. First, we define a new class of
combined automata, called temporalized automata, which can be proved to be the
automata-theoretic counterpart of temporalized logics, and show that relevant
properties, such as closure under Boolean operations, decidability, and
expressive equivalence with respect to temporal logics, transfer from component
automata to temporalized ones. Then, we exploit the correspondence between
temporalized logics and automata to reduce the task of finding the temporal
logic counterparts of the given theories of time granularity to the easier one
of finding temporalized automata counterparts of them.Comment: Journal: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Journal Acronym:
TPLP Category: Paper for Special Issue (Verification and Computational Logic)
Submitted: 18 March 2002, revised: 14 Januari 2003, accepted: 5 September
200
Disjunctive bases: normal forms and model theory for modal logics
We present the concept of a disjunctive basis as a generic framework for
normal forms in modal logic based on coalgebra. Disjunctive bases were defined
in previous work on completeness for modal fixpoint logics, where they played a
central role in the proof of a generic completeness theorem for coalgebraic
mu-calculi. Believing the concept has a much wider significance, here we
investigate it more thoroughly in its own right. We show that the presence of a
disjunctive basis at the "one-step" level entails a number of good properties
for a coalgebraic mu-calculus, in particular, a simulation theorem showing that
every alternating automaton can be transformed into an equivalent
nondeterministic one. Based on this, we prove a Lyndon theorem for the full
fixpoint logic, its fixpoint-free fragment and its one-step fragment, a Uniform
Interpolation result, for both the full mu-calculus and its fixpoint-free
fragment, and a Janin-Walukiewicz-style characterization theorem for the
mu-calculus under slightly stronger assumptions.
We also raise the questions, when a disjunctive basis exists, and how
disjunctive bases are related to Moss' coalgebraic "nabla" modalities. Nabla
formulas provide disjunctive bases for many coalgebraic modal logics, but there
are cases where disjunctive bases give useful normal forms even when nabla
formulas fail to do so, our prime example being graded modal logic. We also
show that disjunctive bases are preserved by forming sums, products and
compositions of coalgebraic modal logics, providing tools for modular
construction of modal logics admitting disjunctive bases. Finally, we consider
the problem of giving a category-theoretic formulation of disjunctive bases,
and provide a partial solution
A Proof of Kamp's theorem
We provide a simple proof of Kamp's theorem
Monadic Second-Order Logic and Bisimulation Invariance for Coalgebras
Generalizing standard monadic second-order logic for Kripke models, we
introduce monadic second-order logic interpreted over coalgebras for an
arbitrary set functor. Similar to well-known results for monadic second-order
logic over trees, we provide a translation of this logic into a class of
automata, relative to the class of coalgebras that admit a tree-like supporting
Kripke frame. We then consider invariance under behavioral equivalence of
formulas; more in particular, we investigate whether the coalgebraic
mu-calculus is the bisimulation-invariant fragment of monadic second-order
logic. Building on recent results by the third author we show that in order to
provide such a coalgebraic generalization of the Janin-Walukiewicz Theorem, it
suffices to find what we call an adequate uniform construction for the functor.
As applications of this result we obtain a partly new proof of the
Janin-Walukiewicz Theorem, and bisimulation invariance results for the bag
functor (graded modal logic) and all exponential polynomial functors.
Finally, we consider in some detail the monotone neighborhood functor, which
provides coalgebraic semantics for monotone modal logic. It turns out that
there is no adequate uniform construction for this functor, whence the
automata-theoretic approach towards bisimulation invariance does not apply
directly. This problem can be overcome if we consider global bisimulations
between neighborhood models: one of our main technical results provides a
characterization of the monotone modal mu-calculus extended with the global
modalities, as the fragment of monadic second-order logic for the monotone
neighborhood functor that is invariant for global bisimulations
Title redacted for blind review
This essay aims to provide a modal logic for rational intuition. Similarly to treatments of the property of knowledge in epistemic logic, I argue that rational intuition can be codified by a modal operator governed by the axioms of a dynamic provability logic, which embeds GL within the modal -calculus. Via correspondence results between modal logic and the bisimulation-invariant fragment of second-order logic, a precise translation can then be provided between the notion of 'intuition-of', i.e., the cognitive phenomenal properties of thoughts, and the modal operators regimenting the notion of 'intuition-that'. I argue that intuition-that can further be shown to entrain conceptual elucidation, by way of figuring as a dynamic-interpretational modality which induces the reinterpretation of both domains of quantification and the intensions and hyperintensions of mathematical concepts that are formalizable in monadic first- and second-order formal languages. Hyperintensionality is countenanced via four models, without a decision as to which model is to be preferred. The first model makes intuition sensitive to hyperintensional topics, i.e. subject matters. The second model is a hyperintensional truthmaker semantics, in particular a novel epistemic two-dimensional truthmaker semantics. The third model is a topic-sensitive non-truthmaker epistemic two-dimensional semantics. The fourth model is a topic-sensitive epistemic two-dimensional truthmaker semantics
Abstracta and Possibilia: Modal Foundations of Mathematical Platonism
This paper aims to provide modal foundations for mathematical platonism. I examine Hale and Wright's (2009) objections to the merits and need, in the defense of mathematical platonism and its epistemology, of the thesis of Necessitism. In response to Hale and Wright's objections to the role of epistemic and metaphysical modalities in providing justification for both the truth of abstraction principles and the success of mathematical predicate reference, I examine the Necessitist commitments of the abundant conception of properties endorsed by Hale and Wright and examined in Hale (2013); and demonstrate how a two-dimensional approach to the epistemology of mathematics is consistent with Hale and Wright's notion of there being non-evidential epistemic entitlement rationally to trust that abstraction principles are true. A choice point that I flag is that between availing of intensional or hyperintensional semantics. The hyperintensional semantic approach that I advance is a topic-sensitive epistemic two-dimensional truthmaker semantics. Epistemic and metaphysical states and possibilities may thus be shown to play a constitutive role in vindicating the reality of mathematical objects and truth, and in providing a conceivability-based route to the truth of abstraction principles as well as other axioms and propositions in mathematics
Non-Transitive Self-Knowledge: Luminosity via Modal μ-Automata
This essay provides a novel account of iterated epistemic states. The essay argues that states of epistemic determinacy might be secured by countenancing self-knowledge on the model of fixed points in monadic second-order modal logic, i.e. the modal -calculus. Despite the epistemic indeterminacy witnessed by the invalidation of modal axiom 4 in the sorites paradox -- i.e. the KK principle: -- an epistemic interpretation of a -automaton permits fixed points to entrain a principled means by which to account for necessary conditions on self-knowledge
FINITE H-DIMENSION DOES NOT IMPLY EXPRESSIVE COMPLETENESS
Accepted versio
- …