1,236 research outputs found

    Zero forcing in iterated line digraphs

    Full text link
    Zero forcing is a propagation process on a graph, or digraph, defined in linear algebra to provide a bound for the minimum rank problem. Independently, zero forcing was introduced in physics, computer science and network science, areas where line digraphs are frequently used as models. Zero forcing is also related to power domination, a propagation process that models the monitoring of electrical power networks. In this paper we study zero forcing in iterated line digraphs and provide a relationship between zero forcing and power domination in line digraphs. In particular, for regular iterated line digraphs we determine the minimum rank/maximum nullity, zero forcing number and power domination number, and provide constructions to attain them. We conclude that regular iterated line digraphs present optimal minimum rank/maximum nullity, zero forcing number and power domination number, and apply our results to determine those parameters on some families of digraphs often used in applications

    Orientable domination in product-like graphs

    Full text link
    The orientable domination number, DOM(G){\rm DOM}(G), of a graph GG is the largest domination number over all orientations of GG. In this paper, DOM{\rm DOM} is studied on different product graphs and related graph operations. The orientable domination number of arbitrary corona products is determined, while sharp lower and upper bounds are proved for Cartesian and lexicographic products. A result of Chartrand et al. from 1996 is extended by establishing the values of DOM(Kn1,n2,n3){\rm DOM}(K_{n_1,n_2,n_3}) for arbitrary positive integers n1,n2n_1,n_2 and n3n_3. While considering the orientable domination number of lexicographic product graphs, we answer in the negative a question concerning domination and packing numbers in acyclic digraphs posed in [Domination in digraphs and their direct and Cartesian products, J. Graph Theory 99 (2022) 359-377]

    Global offensive kk-alliances in digraphs

    Full text link
    In this paper, we initiate the study of global offensive kk-alliances in digraphs. Given a digraph D=(V(D),A(D))D=(V(D),A(D)), a global offensive kk-alliance in a digraph DD is a subset S⊆V(D)S\subseteq V(D) such that every vertex outside of SS has at least one in-neighbor from SS and also at least kk more in-neighbors from SS than from outside of SS, by assuming kk is an integer lying between two minus the maximum in-degree of DD and the maximum in-degree of DD. The global offensive kk-alliance number γko(D)\gamma_{k}^{o}(D) is the minimum cardinality among all global offensive kk-alliances in DD. In this article we begin the study of the global offensive kk-alliance number of digraphs. For instance, we prove that finding the global offensive kk-alliance number of digraphs DD is an NP-hard problem for any value k∈{2−Δ−(D),…,Δ−(D)}k\in \{2-\Delta^-(D),\dots,\Delta^-(D)\} and that it remains NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite digraphs when we consider the non-negative values of kk given in the interval above. Based on these facts, lower bounds on γko(D)\gamma_{k}^{o}(D) with characterizations of all digraphs attaining the bounds are given in this work. We also bound this parameter for bipartite digraphs from above. For the particular case k=1k=1, an immediate result from the definition shows that γ(D)≤γ1o(D)\gamma(D)\leq \gamma_{1}^{o}(D) for all digraphs DD, in which γ(D)\gamma(D) stands for the domination number of DD. We show that these two digraph parameters are the same for some infinite families of digraphs like rooted trees and contrafunctional digraphs. Moreover, we show that the difference between γ1o(D)\gamma_{1}^{o}(D) and γ(D)\gamma(D) can be arbitrary large for directed trees and connected functional digraphs

    Eternal dominating sets on digraphs and orientations of graphs

    Get PDF
    We study the eternal dominating number and the m-eternal dominating number on digraphs. We generalize known results on graphs to digraphs. We also consider the problem "oriented (m-)eternal domination", consisting in finding an orientation of a graph that minimizes its eternal dominating number. We prove that computing the oriented eternal dominating number is NP-hard and characterize the graphs for which the oriented m-eternal dominating number is 2. We also study these two parameters on trees, cycles, complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, trivially perfect graphs and different kinds of grids and products of graphs.Comment: 34 page

    The Distribution of the Domination Number of a Family of Random Interval Catch Digraphs

    Full text link
    We study a new kind of proximity graphs called proportional-edge proximity catch digraphs (PCDs)in a randomized setting. PCDs are a special kind of random catch digraphs that have been developed recently and have applications in statistical pattern classification and spatial point pattern analysis. PCDs are also a special type of intersection digraphs; and for one-dimensional data, the proportional-edge PCD family is also a family of random interval catch digraphs. We present the exact (and asymptotic) distribution of the domination number of this PCD family for uniform (and non-uniform) data in one dimension. We also provide several extensions of this random catch digraph by relaxing the expansion and centrality parameters, thereby determine the parameters for which the asymptotic distribution is non-degenerate. We observe sudden jumps (from degeneracy to non-degeneracy or from a non-degenerate distribution to another) in the asymptotic distribution of the domination number at certain parameter values.Comment: 29 pages, 3 figure

    Domination and location in twin-free digraphs

    Full text link
    A dominating set DD in a digraph is a set of vertices such that every vertex is either in DD or has an in-neighbour in DD. A dominating set DD of a digraph is locating-dominating if every vertex not in DD has a unique set of in-neighbours within DD. The location-domination number γL(G)\gamma_L(G) of a digraph GG is the smallest size of a locating-dominating set of GG. We investigate upper bounds on γL(G)\gamma_L(G) in terms of the order of GG. We characterize those digraphs with location-domination number equal to the order or the order minus one. Such digraphs always have many twins: vertices with the same (open or closed) in-neighbourhoods. Thus, we investigate the value of γL(G)\gamma_L(G) in the absence of twins and give a general method for constructing small locating-dominating sets by the means of special dominating sets. In this way, we show that for every twin-free digraph GG of order nn, γL(G)≤4n5\gamma_L(G)\leq\frac{4n}{5} holds, and there exist twin-free digraphs GG with γL(G)=2(n−2)3\gamma_L(G)=\frac{2(n-2)}{3}. If moreover GG is a tournament or is acyclic, the bound is improved to γL(G)≤⌈n2⌉\gamma_L(G)\leq\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil, which is tight in both cases
    • …
    corecore