333 research outputs found

    Kernels for Below-Upper-Bound Parameterizations of the Hitting Set and Directed Dominating Set Problems

    Get PDF
    In the {\sc Hitting Set} problem, we are given a collection F\cal F of subsets of a ground set VV and an integer pp, and asked whether VV has a pp-element subset that intersects each set in F\cal F. We consider two parameterizations of {\sc Hitting Set} below tight upper bounds: p=m−kp=m-k and p=n−kp=n-k. In both cases kk is the parameter. We prove that the first parameterization is fixed-parameter tractable, but has no polynomial kernel unless coNP⊆\subseteqNP/poly. The second parameterization is W[1]-complete, but the introduction of an additional parameter, the degeneracy of the hypergraph H=(V,F)H=(V,{\cal F}), makes the problem not only fixed-parameter tractable, but also one with a linear kernel. Here the degeneracy of H=(V,F)H=(V,{\cal F}) is the minimum integer dd such that for each X⊂VX\subset V the hypergraph with vertex set V∖XV\setminus X and edge set containing all edges of F\cal F without vertices in XX, has a vertex of degree at most d.d. In {\sc Nonblocker} ({\sc Directed Nonblocker}), we are given an undirected graph (a directed graph) GG on nn vertices and an integer kk, and asked whether GG has a set XX of n−kn-k vertices such that for each vertex y∉Xy\not\in X there is an edge (arc) from a vertex in XX to yy. {\sc Nonblocker} can be viewed as a special case of {\sc Directed Nonblocker} (replace an undirected graph by a symmetric digraph). Dehne et al. (Proc. SOFSEM 2006) proved that {\sc Nonblocker} has a linear-order kernel. We obtain a linear-order kernel for {\sc Directed Nonblocker}

    Clique number of tournaments

    Full text link
    We introduce the notion of clique number of a tournament and investigate its relation with the dichromatic number. In particular, it permits defining \dic-bounded classes of tournaments, which is the paper's main topic

    Uphill & Downhill Domination in Graphs and Related Graph Parameters.

    Get PDF
    Placing degree constraints on the vertices of a path allows the definitions of uphill and downhill paths. Specifically, we say that a path π = v1, v2,...vk+1 is a downhill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(vi) ≥ deg(vi+1). Conversely, a path π = u1, u2,...uk+1 is an uphill path if for every i, 1 ≤ i ≤ k, deg(ui) ≤ deg(ui+1). We investigate graphical parameters related to downhill and uphill paths in graphs. For example, a downhill path set is a set P of vertex disjoint downhill paths such that every vertex v ∈ V belongs to at least one path in P, and the downhill path number is the minimum cardinality of a downhill path set of G. For another example, the downhill domination number of a graph G is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a set S of vertices such that every vertex in V lies on a downhill path from some vertex in S. The uphill domination number is defined as expected. We determine relationships among these invariants and other graphical parameters related to downhill and uphill paths. We also give a polynomial time algorithm to find a minimum downhill dominating set and a minimum uphill dominating set for any graph
    • …
    corecore