Efficient computation of exact solutions for quantitative model checking

Quantitative model checkers for Markov Decision Processes typically use finite-precision arithmetic. If all the coefficients in the process are rational numbers, then the model checking results are rational, and so they can be computed exactly. However, exact techniques are generally too expensive or limited in scalability. In this paper we propose a method for obtaining exact results starting from an approximated solution in finite-precision arithmetic. The input of the method is a description of a scheduler, which can be obtained by a model checker using finite precision. Given a scheduler, we show how to obtain a corresponding basis in a linear-programming problem, in such a way that the basis is optimal whenever the scheduler attains the worst-case probability. This correspondence is already known for discounted MDPs, we show how to apply it in the undiscounted case provided that some preprocessing is done. Using the correspondence, the linear-programming problem can be solved in exact arithmetic starting from the basis obtained. As a consequence, the method finds the worst-case probability even if the scheduler provided by the model checker was not optimal. In our experiments, the calculation of exact solutions from a candidate scheduler is significantly faster than the calculation using the simplex method under exact arithmetic starting from a default basis.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2012, arXiv:1207.055

Invariant Generation through Strategy Iteration in Succinctly Represented Control Flow Graphs

We consider the problem of computing numerical invariants of programs, for instance bounds on the values of numerical program variables. More specifically, we study the problem of performing static analysis by abstract interpretation using template linear constraint domains. Such invariants can be obtained by Kleene iterations that are, in order to guarantee termination, accelerated by widening operators. In many cases, however, applying this form of extrapolation leads to invariants that are weaker than the strongest inductive invariant that can be expressed within the abstract domain in use. Another well-known source of imprecision of traditional abstract interpretation techniques stems from their use of join operators at merge nodes in the control flow graph. The mentioned weaknesses may prevent these methods from proving safety properties. The technique we develop in this article addresses both of these issues: contrary to Kleene iterations accelerated by widening operators, it is guaranteed to yield the strongest inductive invariant that can be expressed within the template linear constraint domain in use. It also eschews join operators by distinguishing all paths of loop-free code segments. Formally speaking, our technique computes the least fixpoint within a given template linear constraint domain of a transition relation that is succinctly expressed as an existentially quantified linear real arithmetic formula. In contrast to previously published techniques that rely on quantifier elimination, our algorithm is proved to have optimal complexity: we prove that the decision problem associated with our fixpoint problem is in the second level of the polynomial-time hierarchy.Comment: 35 pages, conference version published at ESOP 2011, this version is a CoRR version of our submission to Logical Methods in Computer Scienc