The complexity of conservative finite-valued CSPs

We study the complexity of valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSP). A problem from VCSP is characterised by a \emph{constraint language}, a fixed set of cost functions over a finite domain. An instance of the problem is specified by a sum of cost functions from the language and the goal is to minimise the sum. We consider the case of so-called \emph{conservative} languages; that is, languages containing all unary cost functions, thus allowing arbitrary restrictions on the domains of the variables. This problem has been studied by Bulatov [LICS'03] for $\{0,\infty\}$-valued languages (i.e. CSP), by Cohen~\etal\ (AIJ'06) for Boolean domains, by Deineko et al. (JACM'08) for $\{0,1\}$-valued cost functions (i.e. Max-CSP), and by Takhanov (STACS'10) for $\{0,\infty\}$-valued languages containing all finite-valued unary cost functions (i.e. Min-Cost-Hom). We give an elementary proof of a complete complexity classification of conservative finite-valued languages: we show that every conservative finite-valued language is either tractable or NP-hard. This is the \emph{first} dichotomy result for finite-valued VCSPs over non-Boolean domains.Comment: 15 page

The complexity of finite-valued CSPs

We study the computational complexity of exact minimisation of rational-valued discrete functions. Let $\Gamma$ be a set of rational-valued functions on a fixed finite domain; such a set is called a finite-valued constraint language. The valued constraint satisfaction problem, $\operatorname{VCSP}(\Gamma)$, is the problem of minimising a function given as a sum of functions from $\Gamma$. We establish a dichotomy theorem with respect to exact solvability for all finite-valued constraint languages defined on domains of arbitrary finite size. We show that every constraint language $\Gamma$ either admits a binary symmetric fractional polymorphism in which case the basic linear programming relaxation solves any instance of $\operatorname{VCSP}(\Gamma)$ exactly, or $\Gamma$ satisfies a simple hardness condition that allows for a polynomial-time reduction from Max-Cut to $\operatorname{VCSP}(\Gamma)$

Computational Complexity of the Minimum Cost Homomorphism Problem on Three-Element Domains

In this paper we study the computational complexity of the (extended) minimum cost homomorphism problem (Min-Cost-Hom) as a function of a constraint language, i.e. a set of constraint relations and cost functions that are allowed to appear in instances. A wide range of natural combinatorial optimisation problems can be expressed as Min-Cost-Homs and a classification of their complexity would be highly desirable, both from a direct, applied point of view as well as from a theoretical perspective. Min-Cost-Hom can be understood either as a flexible optimisation version of the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) or a restriction of the (general-valued) valued constraint satisfaction problem (VCSP). Other optimisation versions of CSPs such as the minimum solution problem (Min-Sol) and the minimum ones problem (Min-Ones) are special cases of Min-Cost-Hom. The study of VCSPs has recently seen remarkable progress. A complete classification for the complexity of finite-valued languages on arbitrary finite domains has been obtained Thapper and Zivny [STOC'13]. However, understanding the complexity of languages that are not finite-valued appears to be more difficult. Min-Cost-Hom allows us to study problematic languages of this type without having to deal with with the full generality of the VCSP. A recent classification for the complexity of three-element Min-Sol, Uppman [ICALP'13], takes a step in this direction. In this paper we extend this result considerably by determining the complexity of three-element Min-Cost-Hom

The Complexity of General-Valued CSPs

An instance of the Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problem (VCSP) is given by a finite set of variables, a finite domain of labels, and a sum of functions, each function depending on a subset of the variables. Each function can take finite values specifying costs of assignments of labels to its variables or the infinite value, which indicates an infeasible assignment. The goal is to find an assignment of labels to the variables that minimizes the sum. We study, assuming that P ≠ NP, how the complexity of this very general problem depends on the set of functions allowed in the instances, the so-called constraint language. The case when all allowed functions take values in {0, ∞} corresponds to ordinary CSPs, where one deals only with the feasibility issue and there is no optimization. This case is the subject of the Algebraic CSP Dichotomy Conjecture predicting for which constraint languages CSPs are tractable (i.e. solvable in polynomial time) and for which NP-hard. The case when all allowed functions take only finite values corresponds to finite-valued CSP, where the feasibility aspect is trivial and one deals only with the optimization issue. The complexity of finite-valued CSPs was fully classified by Thapper and Zivny. An algebraic necessary condition for tractability of a general-valued CSP with a fixed constraint language was recently given by Kozik and Ochremiak. As our main result, we prove that if a constraint language satisfies this algebraic necessary condition, and the feasibility CSP (i.e. the problem of deciding whether a given instance has a feasible solution) corresponding to the VCSP with this language is tractable, then the VCSP is tractable. The algorithm is a simple combination of the assumed algorithm for the feasibility CSP and the standard LP relaxation. As a corollary, we obtain that a dichotomy for ordinary CSPs would imply a dichotomy for general-valued CSPs

Submodular Functions and Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problems over Infinite Domains

Valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs) are a large class of combinatorial optimisation problems. It is desirable to classify the computational complexity of VCSPs depending on a fixed set of allowed cost functions in the input. Recently, the computational complexity of all VCSPs for finite sets of cost functions over finite domains has been classified in this sense. Many natural optimisation problems, however, cannot be formulated as VCSPs over a finite domain. We initiate the systematic investigation of infinite-domain VCSPs by studying the complexity of VCSPs for piecewise linear homogeneous cost functions. We remark that in this paper the infinite domain will always be the set of rational numbers. We show that such VCSPs can be solved in polynomial time when the cost functions are additionally submodular, and that this is indeed a maximally tractable class: adding any cost function that is not submodular leads to an NP-hard VCSP

Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problems over Infinite Domains

The object of the thesis is the computational complexity of certain combinatorial optimisation problems called \emph{valued constraint satisfaction problems}, or \emph{VCSPs} for short. The requirements and optimisation criteria of these problems are expressed by sums of \emph{(valued) constraints} (also called \emph{cost functions}). More precisely, the input of a VCSP consists of a finite set of variables, a finite set of cost functions that depend on these variables, and a cost $u$; the task is to find values for the variables such that the sum of the cost functions is at most $u$. By restricting the set of possible cost functions in the input, a great variety of computational optimisation problems can be modelled as VCSPs. Recently, the computational complexity of all VCSPs for finite sets of cost functions over a finite domain has been classified. Many natural optimisation problems, however, cannot be formulated as VCSPs over a finite domain. We initiate the systematic investigation of infinite-domain VCSPs by studying the complexity of VCSPs for piecewise linear (PL) and piecewise linear homogeneous (PLH) cost functions. The VCSP for a finite set of PLH cost functions can be solved in polynomial time if the cost functions are improved by fully symmetric fractional operations of all arities. We show this by (polynomial-time many-one) reducing the problem to a finite-domain VCSP which can be solved using a linear programming relaxation. We apply this result to show the polynomial-time tractability of VCSPs for {\it submodular} PLH cost functions, for {\it convex} PLH cost functions, and for {\it componentwise increasing} PLH cost functions; in fact, we show that submodular PLH functions and componentwise increasing PLH functions form maximally tractable classes of PLH cost functions. We define the notion of {\it expressive power} for sets of cost functions over arbitrary domains, and discuss the relation between the expressive power and the set of fractional operations improving the same set of cost functions over an arbitrary countable domain. Finally, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm solving the restriction of the VCSP for {\it all} PL cost functions to a fixed number of variables

Complexity Classifications for the Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problem

In a valued constraint satisfaction problem (VCSP), the goal is to find an assignment of values to variables that minimizes a given sum of functions. Each function in the sum depends on a subset of variables, takes values which are rational numbers or infinity, and is chosen from a fixed finite set of functions called a constraint language. We study how the computational complexity of this problem depends on the constraint language. We often consider the case where infinite values are disallowed, and refer to such constraint languages as being finite-valued. If we consider such finite-valued constraint languages, the case where we allow variables to take two values was classified by Cohen et al., who show that submodular functions essentially give rise to the only tractable case. Non-submodular functions can be used to express the NP-hard Max Cut problem. We consider the case where the variables can take three values, and identify a new infinite set of functions called skew bisubmodular functions which imply tractability. We prove that submodularity with respect to some total order and skew bisubmodularity give rise to the only tractable cases, and in all other cases Max Cut can be expressed. We also show that our characterisation of tractable cases is tight, that is, none of the conditions can be omitted. Thus, our results provide a new dichotomy theorem in constraint satisfaction research. We also negatively answer the question of whether multimorphisms can capture all necessary tractable constraint languages. We then study the VCSP as a homomorphism problem on digraphs. By adapting a proof designed for CSPs we show that each VCSP with a fixed finite constraint language is equivalent to one where the constraint language consists of one {0,infinity}-valued binary function (i.e. a digraph) and one finite-valued unary function. This latter problem is known as the Minimum Cost Homomorphism Problem for digraphs. We also show that our reduction preserves a number of useful algebraic properties of the constraint language. Finally, given a finite-valued constraint language, we consider the case where the variables of our VCSP are allowed to take four values. We prove that 1-defect chain multimorphisms, which are required in the four element dichotomy of Min CSP, are a special case of more general fractional polymorphisms we call {a,b}-1-defect fractional polymorphisms. We conclude with a conjecture for the four element case, and some interesting open problems which might lead to a tighter description of tractable finite-valued constraint languages on finite domains of any size