33,686 research outputs found
Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
The field of fluid mechanics is rapidly advancing, driven by unprecedented
volumes of data from field measurements, experiments and large-scale
simulations at multiple spatiotemporal scales. Machine learning offers a wealth
of techniques to extract information from data that could be translated into
knowledge about the underlying fluid mechanics. Moreover, machine learning
algorithms can augment domain knowledge and automate tasks related to flow
control and optimization. This article presents an overview of past history,
current developments, and emerging opportunities of machine learning for fluid
mechanics. It outlines fundamental machine learning methodologies and discusses
their uses for understanding, modeling, optimizing, and controlling fluid
flows. The strengths and limitations of these methods are addressed from the
perspective of scientific inquiry that considers data as an inherent part of
modeling, experimentation, and simulation. Machine learning provides a powerful
information processing framework that can enrich, and possibly even transform,
current lines of fluid mechanics research and industrial applications.Comment: To appear in the Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics, 202
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
The success of machine learning algorithms generally depends on data
representation, and we hypothesize that this is because different
representations can entangle and hide more or less the different explanatory
factors of variation behind the data. Although specific domain knowledge can be
used to help design representations, learning with generic priors can also be
used, and the quest for AI is motivating the design of more powerful
representation-learning algorithms implementing such priors. This paper reviews
recent work in the area of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning,
covering advances in probabilistic models, auto-encoders, manifold learning,
and deep networks. This motivates longer-term unanswered questions about the
appropriate objectives for learning good representations, for computing
representations (i.e., inference), and the geometrical connections between
representation learning, density estimation and manifold learning
Foundational principles for large scale inference: Illustrations through correlation mining
When can reliable inference be drawn in the "Big Data" context? This paper
presents a framework for answering this fundamental question in the context of
correlation mining, with implications for general large scale inference. In
large scale data applications like genomics, connectomics, and eco-informatics
the dataset is often variable-rich but sample-starved: a regime where the
number of acquired samples (statistical replicates) is far fewer than the
number of observed variables (genes, neurons, voxels, or chemical
constituents). Much of recent work has focused on understanding the
computational complexity of proposed methods for "Big Data." Sample complexity
however has received relatively less attention, especially in the setting when
the sample size is fixed, and the dimension grows without bound. To
address this gap, we develop a unified statistical framework that explicitly
quantifies the sample complexity of various inferential tasks. Sampling regimes
can be divided into several categories: 1) the classical asymptotic regime
where the variable dimension is fixed and the sample size goes to infinity; 2)
the mixed asymptotic regime where both variable dimension and sample size go to
infinity at comparable rates; 3) the purely high dimensional asymptotic regime
where the variable dimension goes to infinity and the sample size is fixed.
Each regime has its niche but only the latter regime applies to exa-scale data
dimension. We illustrate this high dimensional framework for the problem of
correlation mining, where it is the matrix of pairwise and partial correlations
among the variables that are of interest. We demonstrate various regimes of
correlation mining based on the unifying perspective of high dimensional
learning rates and sample complexity for different structured covariance models
and different inference tasks
- …