45 research outputs found
Efficient Open World Reasoning for Planning
We consider the problem of reasoning and planning with incomplete knowledge
and deterministic actions. We introduce a knowledge representation scheme
called PSIPLAN that can effectively represent incompleteness of an agent's
knowledge while allowing for sound, complete and tractable entailment in
domains where the set of all objects is either unknown or infinite. We present
a procedure for state update resulting from taking an action in PSIPLAN that is
correct, complete and has only polynomial complexity. State update is performed
without considering the set of all possible worlds corresponding to the
knowledge state. As a result, planning with PSIPLAN is done without direct
manipulation of possible worlds. PSIPLAN representation underlies the PSIPOP
planning algorithm that handles quantified goals with or without exceptions
that no other domain independent planner has been shown to achieve. PSIPLAN has
been implemented in Common Lisp and used in an application on planning in a
collaborative interface.Comment: 39 pages, 13 figures. to appear in Logical Methods in Computer
Scienc
Efficient Multi-agent Epistemic Planning: Teaching Planners About Nested Belief
Many AI applications involve the interaction of multiple autonomous agents, requiring those agents to reason about their own beliefs, as well as those of other agents. However, planning involving nested beliefs is known to be computationally challenging. In this work, we address the task of synthesizing plans that necessitate reasoning about the beliefs of other agents. We plan from the perspective of a single agent with the potential for goals and actions that involve nested beliefs, non-homogeneous agents, co-present observations, and the ability for one agent to reason as if it were another. We formally characterize our notion of planning with nested belief, and subsequently demonstrate how to automatically convert such problems into problems that appeal to classical planning technology for solving efficiently. Our approach represents an important step towards applying the well-established field of automated planning to the challenging task of planning involving nested beliefs of multiple agents
Planning as Theorem Proving with Heuristics
Planning as theorem proving in situation calculus was abandoned 50 years ago
as an impossible project. But we have developed a Theorem Proving Lifted
Heuristic (TPLH) planner that searches for a plan in a tree of situations using
the A* search algorithm. It is controlled by a delete relaxation-based domain
independent heuristic. We compare TPLH with Fast Downward (FD) and Best First
Width Search (BFWS) planners over several standard benchmarks. Since our
implementation of the heuristic function is not optimized, TPLH is slower than
FD and BFWS. But it computes shorter plans, and it explores fewer states. We
discuss previous research on planning within KR\&R and identify related
directions. Thus, we show that deductive lifted heuristic planning in situation
calculus is actually doable.Comment: Submitted for a review. Copyright (C) 2023 by Mikhail Soutchanski and
Ryan Youn
Action Logic Programs: How to Specify Strategic Behavior in Dynamic Domains Using Logical Rules
We discuss a new concept of agent programs that combines logic programming with reasoning about actions. These agent logic programs are characterized by a clear separation between the specification of the agent’s strategic behavior and the underlying theory about the agent’s actions and their effects. This makes it a generic, declarative agent programming language, which can be combined with an action representation formalism of one’s choice. We present a declarative semantics for agent logic programs along with (two versions of) a sound and complete operational semantics, which combines the standard inference mechanisms for (constraint) logic programs with reasoning about actions
The Language of Search
This paper is concerned with a class of algorithms that perform exhaustive
search on propositional knowledge bases. We show that each of these algorithms
defines and generates a propositional language. Specifically, we show that the
trace of a search can be interpreted as a combinational circuit, and a search
algorithm then defines a propositional language consisting of circuits that are
generated across all possible executions of the algorithm. In particular, we
show that several versions of exhaustive DPLL search correspond to such
well-known languages as FBDD, OBDD, and a precisely-defined subset of d-DNNF.
By thus mapping search algorithms to propositional languages, we provide a
uniform and practical framework in which successful search techniques can be
harnessed for compilation of knowledge into various languages of interest, and
a new methodology whereby the power and limitations of search algorithms can be
understood by looking up the tractability and succinctness of the corresponding
propositional languages
Planning Over Multi-Agent Epistemic States: A Classical Planning Approach
Many AI applications involve the interaction of multiple autonomous agents, requiring those agents to reason about their own beliefs, as well as those of other agents. However, planning involving nested beliefs is known to be computationally challenging. In this work, we address the task of synthesizing plans that necessitate reasoning about the beliefs of other agents. We plan from the perspective of a single agent with the potential for goals and actions that involve nested beliefs, non-homogeneous agents, co-present observations, and the ability for one agent to reason as if it were another. We formally characterize our notion of planning with nested belief, and subsequently demonstrate how to automatically convert such problems into problems that appeal to classical planning technology. Our approach represents an important first step towards applying the well-established field of automated planning to the challenging task of planning involving nested beliefs of multiple agents