Approximations in Learning & Program Analysis

In this work we compare and contrast the approximations made in the problems of Data Compression, Program Analysis and Supervised Machine Learning. G\uf6del\u2019s Incompleteness Theorem mandates that any formal system rich enough to include integers will have unprovable truths. Thus non computable problems abound, including, but not limited to, Program Analysis, Data Compression and Machine Learning. Indeed, it can be shown that there are more non-computable functions than computable. Due to non- computability, precise solutions for these problems are not feasible, and only approximate solutions may be computed. Presently, each of these problems of Data Compression, Machine Learning and Program Analysis is studied independently. Each problem has it\u2019s own multitude of abstractions, algorithms and notions of tradeoffs among the various parameters. It would be interesting to have a unified framework, across disciplines, that makes explicit the abstraction specifications and ensuing tradeoffs. Such a framework would promote inter-disciplinary research and develop a unified body of knowledge to tackle non-computable problems. As a small step to that larger goal, we propose an Information Oriented Model of Computation that allows comparing the approximations used in Data Compression, Program Analysis and Machine Learning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to propose a method for systematic comparison of approximations across disciplines. The model describes computation as set reconstruction. Non-computability is then presented as inability to perfectly reconstruct sets. In an effort to compare and contrast the approximations, select algorithms for Data Compression, Machine Learning and Program Analysis are analyzed using our model. We were able to relate the problems of Data Compression, Machine Learning and Program Analysis as specific instances of the general problem of approximate set reconstruction. We demonstrate the use of abstract interpreters in compression schemes. We then compare and contrast the approximations in Program Analysis and Supervised Machine Learning. We demonstrate the use of ordered structures, fixpoint equations and least fixpoint approximation computations, all characteristic of Abstract Interpretation (Program Analysis) in Machine Learning algorithms. We also present the idea that widening, like regression, is an inductive learner. Regression generalizes known states to a hypothesis. Widening generalizes abstract states on a iteration chain to a fixpoint. While Regression usually aims to minimize the total error (sum of false positives and false negatives), Widening aims for soundness and hence errs on the side of false positives to have zero false negatives. We use this duality to derive a generic widening operator from regression on the set of abstract states. The results of the dissertation are the first steps towards a unified approach to approximate computation. Consequently, our preliminary results lead to a lot more interesting questions, some of which we have tried to discuss in the concluding chapter

Combining Models of Approximation with Partial Learning

In Gold's framework of inductive inference, the model of partial learning requires the learner to output exactly one correct index for the target object and only the target object infinitely often. Since infinitely many of the learner's hypotheses may be incorrect, it is not obvious whether a partial learner can be modifed to "approximate" the target object. Fulk and Jain (Approximate inference and scientific method. Information and Computation 114(2):179--191, 1994) introduced a model of approximate learning of recursive functions. The present work extends their research and solves an open problem of Fulk and Jain by showing that there is a learner which approximates and partially identifies every recursive function by outputting a sequence of hypotheses which, in addition, are also almost all finite variants of the target function. The subsequent study is dedicated to the question how these findings generalise to the learning of r.e. languages from positive data. Here three variants of approximate learning will be introduced and investigated with respect to the question whether they can be combined with partial learning. Following the line of Fulk and Jain's research, further investigations provide conditions under which partial language learners can eventually output only finite variants of the target language. The combinabilities of other partial learning criteria will also be briefly studied.Comment: 28 page

PAC learning of probability distributions over a discrete domain

AbstractWe investigate learning of classes of distributions over a discrete domain in a PAC context. We introduce two paradigms of PAC learning, namely absolute PAC learning, which is independent of the representation of the class of hypotheses, and PAC learning wrt the indexes, which heavily depends on such representations. We characterize non-computable learnability in both contexts. Then we investigate efficient learning strategies which are simulated by a polynomial-time Turing machine. One strategy is the frequentist one. According to this strategy, the learner conjectures a hypothesis which is as close as possible to the distribution given by the frequency relative to the examples. We characterize the classes of distributions which are absolutely PAC learnable by means of this strategy, and we relate frequentist learning wrt the indexes to the NP=RP problem. Finally, we present another strategy for learning wrt the indexes, namely learning by tests

Formal Modeling of Connectionism using Concurrency Theory, an Approach Based on Automata and Model Checking

This paper illustrates a framework for applying formal methods techniques, which are symbolic in nature, to specifying and verifying neural networks, which are sub-symbolic in nature. The paper describes a communicating automata [Bowman & Gomez, 2006] model of neural networks. We also implement the model using timed automata [Alur & Dill, 1994] and then undertake a verification of these models using the model checker Uppaal [Pettersson, 2000] in order to evaluate the performance of learning algorithms. This paper also presents discussion of a number of broad issues concerning cognitive neuroscience and the debate as to whether symbolic processing or connectionism is a suitable representation of cognitive systems. Additionally, the issue of integrating symbolic techniques, such as formal methods, with complex neural networks is discussed. We then argue that symbolic verifications may give theoretically well-founded ways to evaluate and justify neural learning systems in the field of both theoretical research and real world applications