Concepts and Cognitive Science

Given the fundamental role that concepts play in theories of cognition, philosophers and cognitive scientists have a common interest in concepts. Nonetheless, there is a great deal of controversy regarding what kinds of things concepts are, how they are structured, and how they are acquired. This chapter offers a detailed high-level overview and critical evaluation of the main theories of concepts and their motivations. Taking into account the various challenges that each theory faces, the chapter also presents a novel approach to concepts that is organized around two ideas. The first is a pluralistic view of differing types of conceptual structure. The second is a model that treats concepts as atomic representations that are linked to various types of conceptual structures

The Logic of Principia Mathematica

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 1995.Includes bibliographical references (p. 181-184).by Darryl Jung.Ph.D

The continuum hypothesis : independence and truth-value

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Philosophy, 1974.MIT Humanities Library copy: issued in two vols.Leaf number 84 used twice. Also issued as a two-volume set.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 217-258).by Thomas S. Weston.Ph.D

Imagism in Locke, Berkeley and Hume

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston UniversityLocke, Berkeley, and Hume--referred to as "the classical British empiricists"--are examined for the extent to which a doctrine, called 'imagism' by Price, played a formative role in their philosophies. Imagism as defined has two main varieties, the polemical version and the constructive version. According to the former, images are the primary symbols in thinking and all other symbols are secondary and derivative. According to the latter, thought is the manipulation of mental images. It is this latter doctrine which is demonstrated as applicable to the classical British empiricists; so far as the former doctrine appears at all, it is an aberrant doctrine.[TRUNCATED