23,398 research outputs found
Transactions and updates in deductive databases
n this paper we develop a new approach providing a smooth integration of extensional updates and declarative query language for deductive databases. The approach is based on a declarative speci cation of updates in rule bodies. Updates are not executed as soon are evaluated. Instead, they are collectedand then applied to the database when the query evaluation is completed. We call this approach non-immediate update semantics. We provide a top down and equivalent bottom-up semantics which re ect the corresponding computation models. We also package set of updates into transactions and we provide a formal semantics for transactions. Then, in order to handle complex transactions, we extend the transaction language with control constructors still perserving formal semantics and semantics equivalence
Updates by Reasoning about States
It has been argued that some sort of control must be introduced in order to perform update operations in deductive databases. Indeed, many approaches rely on a procedural semantics of rule based languages and often perform updates as side-effects. Depending on the evaluation procedure, updates are generally performed in the body (top-down evaluation) or in the head of rules (bottom-up evaluation). We demonstrate that updates can be specified in a purely declarative manner using standard model based semantics without relying on procedural aspects of program evaluation. The key idea is to incorporate states as first-class objects into the language. This is the source of the additional expressiveness needed to define updates. We introduce the update language Statelog+-, discuss various domains of application and outline how to implement computation of the perfect model semantics for Statelog+- programs
Introducing Dynamic Behavior in Amalgamated Knowledge Bases
The problem of integrating knowledge from multiple and heterogeneous sources
is a fundamental issue in current information systems. In order to cope with
this problem, the concept of mediator has been introduced as a software
component providing intermediate services, linking data resources and
application programs, and making transparent the heterogeneity of the
underlying systems. In designing a mediator architecture, we believe that an
important aspect is the definition of a formal framework by which one is able
to model integration according to a declarative style. To this purpose, the use
of a logical approach seems very promising. Another important aspect is the
ability to model both static integration aspects, concerning query execution,
and dynamic ones, concerning data updates and their propagation among the
various data sources. Unfortunately, as far as we know, no formal proposals for
logically modeling mediator architectures both from a static and dynamic point
of view have already been developed. In this paper, we extend the framework for
amalgamated knowledge bases, presented by Subrahmanian, to deal with dynamic
aspects. The language we propose is based on the Active U-Datalog language, and
extends it with annotated logic and amalgamation concepts. We model the sources
of information and the mediator (also called supervisor) as Active U-Datalog
deductive databases, thus modeling queries, transactions, and active rules,
interpreted according to the PARK semantics. By using active rules, the system
can efficiently perform update propagation among different databases. The
result is a logical environment, integrating active and deductive rules, to
perform queries and update propagation in an heterogeneous mediated framework.Comment: Other Keywords: Deductive databases; Heterogeneous databases; Active
rules; Update
State-of-the-art on evolution and reactivity
This report starts by, in Chapter 1, outlining aspects of querying and updating resources on
the Web and on the Semantic Web, including the development of query and update languages
to be carried out within the Rewerse project.
From this outline, it becomes clear that several existing research areas and topics are of
interest for this work in Rewerse. In the remainder of this report we further present state of
the art surveys in a selection of such areas and topics. More precisely: in Chapter 2 we give
an overview of logics for reasoning about state change and updates; Chapter 3 is devoted to briefly describing existing update languages for the Web, and also for updating logic programs;
in Chapter 4 event-condition-action rules, both in the context of active database systems and
in the context of semistructured data, are surveyed; in Chapter 5 we give an overview of some relevant rule-based agents frameworks
Dynamic Provenance for SPARQL Update
While the Semantic Web currently can exhibit provenance information by using
the W3C PROV standards, there is a "missing link" in connecting PROV to storing
and querying for dynamic changes to RDF graphs using SPARQL. Solving this
problem would be required for such clear use-cases as the creation of version
control systems for RDF. While some provenance models and annotation techniques
for storing and querying provenance data originally developed with databases or
workflows in mind transfer readily to RDF and SPARQL, these techniques do not
readily adapt to describing changes in dynamic RDF datasets over time. In this
paper we explore how to adapt the dynamic copy-paste provenance model of
Buneman et al. [2] to RDF datasets that change over time in response to SPARQL
updates, how to represent the resulting provenance records themselves as RDF in
a manner compatible with W3C PROV, and how the provenance information can be
defined by reinterpreting SPARQL updates. The primary contribution of this
paper is a semantic framework that enables the semantics of SPARQL Update to be
used as the basis for a 'cut-and-paste' provenance model in a principled
manner.Comment: Pre-publication version of ISWC 2014 pape
- …