4,420 research outputs found
Generating a contract checker for an SLA language
SLAng is a language for expressing Service LevelAgreements (SLAs) under development as part of the Europeanproject TAPAS. It is defined using a meta-model, an instance ofthe Meta-Object Facility (MOF) model, in which the relationshipbetween the syntax of the language and its domain of applicationis explicitly represented, and the violation semantics ofthe language defined using Object Constraint Language (OCL)constraints. The concrete syntax of the language is the XMLMeta-data Interchange (XMI) mapping of the syntactic part ofthe meta-model. In this paper we describe how the Java MetadataInterface (JMI) mapping can be applied to the meta-modelof the language to generate interfaces and classes to create andquery SLAs and relevant service monitoring data in memory;and how an OCL interpreter can be applied to check violationconstraints over this data, resulting in the implementation of acontract checker that is highly likely to respect the semantics ofthe language
ADsafety: Type-Based Verification of JavaScript Sandboxing
Web sites routinely incorporate JavaScript programs from several sources into
a single page. These sources must be protected from one another, which requires
robust sandboxing. The many entry-points of sandboxes and the subtleties of
JavaScript demand robust verification of the actual sandbox source. We use a
novel type system for JavaScript to encode and verify sandboxing properties.
The resulting verifier is lightweight and efficient, and operates on actual
source. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our technique by applying it to
ADsafe, which revealed several bugs and other weaknesses.Comment: in Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium (2011
Towards Vulnerability Discovery Using Staged Program Analysis
Eliminating vulnerabilities from low-level code is vital for securing
software. Static analysis is a promising approach for discovering
vulnerabilities since it can provide developers early feedback on the code they
write. But, it presents multiple challenges not the least of which is
understanding what makes a bug exploitable and conveying this information to
the developer. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a
practical vulnerability assessment framework, called Melange. Melange performs
data and control flow analysis to diagnose potential security bugs, and outputs
well-formatted bug reports that help developers understand and fix security
bugs. Based on the intuition that real-world vulnerabilities manifest
themselves across multiple parts of a program, Melange performs both local and
global analyses. To scale up to large programs, global analysis is
demand-driven. Our prototype detects multiple vulnerability classes in C and
C++ code including type confusion, and garbage memory reads. We have evaluated
Melange extensively. Our case studies show that Melange scales up to large
codebases such as Chromium, is easy-to-use, and most importantly, capable of
discovering vulnerabilities in real-world code. Our findings indicate that
static analysis is a viable reinforcement to the software testing tool set.Comment: A revised version to appear in the proceedings of the 13th conference
on Detection of Intrusions and Malware & Vulnerability Assessment (DIMVA),
July 201
Exact Gap Computation for Code Coverage Metrics in ISO-C
Test generation and test data selection are difficult tasks for model based
testing. Tests for a program can be meld to a test suite. A lot of research is
done to quantify the quality and improve a test suite. Code coverage metrics
estimate the quality of a test suite. This quality is fine, if the code
coverage value is high or 100%. Unfortunately it might be impossible to achieve
100% code coverage because of dead code for example. There is a gap between the
feasible and theoretical maximal possible code coverage value. Our review of
the research indicates, none of current research is concerned with exact gap
computation. This paper presents a framework to compute such gaps exactly in an
ISO-C compatible semantic and similar languages. We describe an efficient
approximation of the gap in all the other cases. Thus, a tester can decide if
more tests might be able or necessary to achieve better coverage.Comment: In Proceedings MBT 2012, arXiv:1202.582
Abstract verification and debugging of constraint logic programs
The technique of Abstract Interpretation [13] has allowed the development of sophisticated program analyses which are provably correct and practical. The semantic approximations produced by such analyses have been traditionally applied to optimization during program compilation. However, recently, novel and promising applications of semantic approximations have been proposed in the more general context of program verification and debugging [3],[10],[7]
Checking-in on Network Functions
When programming network functions, changes within a packet tend to have
consequences---side effects which must be accounted for by network programmers
or administrators via arbitrary logic and an innate understanding of
dependencies. Examples of this include updating checksums when a packet's
contents has been modified or adjusting a payload length field of a IPv6 header
if another header is added or updated within a packet. While static-typing
captures interface specifications and how packet contents should behave, it
does not enforce precise invariants around runtime dependencies like the
examples above. Instead, during the design phase of network functions,
programmers should be given an easier way to specify checks up front, all
without having to account for and keep track of these consequences at each and
every step during the development cycle. In keeping with this view, we present
a unique approach for adding and generating both static checks and dynamic
contracts for specifying and checking packet processing operations. We develop
our technique within an existing framework called NetBricks and demonstrate how
our approach simplifies and checks common dependent packet and header
processing logic that other systems take for granted, all without adding much
overhead during development.Comment: ANRW 2019 ~ https://irtf.org/anrw/2019/program.htm
Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications
Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for
the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research
experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts
today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited
abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes,
thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led
to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at
formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism
are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of
clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN)
paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right
kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence
in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and
synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a
self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in
formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial
A graph-based aspect interference detection approach for UML-based aspect-oriented models
Aspect Oriented Modeling (AOM) techniques facilitate separate modeling of concerns and allow for a more flexible composition of these than traditional modeling technique. While this improves the understandability of each submodel, in order to reason about the behavior of the composed system and to detect conflicts among submodels, automated tool support is required. Current techniques for conflict detection among aspects generally have at least one of the following weaknesses. They require to manually model the abstract semantics for each system; or they derive the system semantics from code assuming one specific aspect-oriented language. Defining an extra semantics model for verification bears the risk of inconsistencies between the actual and the verified design; verifying only at implementation level hinders fixng errors in earlier phases. We propose a technique for fully automatic detection of conflicts between aspects at the model level; more specifically, our approach works on UML models with an extension for modeling pointcuts and advice. As back-end we use a graph-based model checker, for which we have defined an operational semantics of UML diagrams, pointcuts and advice. In order to simulate the system, we automatically derive a graph model from the diagrams. The result is another graph, which represents all possible program executions, and which can be verified against a declarative specification of invariants.\ud
To demonstrate our approach, we discuss a UML-based AOM model of the "Crisis Management System" and a possible design and evolution scenario. The complexity of the system makes con°icts among composed aspects hard to detect: already in the case of two simulated aspects, the state space contains 623 di®erent states and 9 different execution paths. Nevertheless, in case the right pruning methods are used, the state-space only grows linearly with the number of aspects; therefore, the automatic analysis scales
- …