3,059 research outputs found
On the fixed-parameter tractability of the maximum connectivity improvement problem
In the Maximum Connectivity Improvement (MCI) problem, we are given a
directed graph and an integer and we are asked to find new
edges to be added to in order to maximize the number of connected pairs of
vertices in the resulting graph. The MCI problem has been studied from the
approximation point of view. In this paper, we approach it from the
parameterized complexity perspective in the case of directed acyclic graphs. We
show several hardness and algorithmic results with respect to different natural
parameters. Our main result is that the problem is -hard for parameter
and it is FPT for parameters and , the matching number of
. We further characterize the MCI problem with respect to other
complementary parameters.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figur
Approximating subset -connectivity problems
A subset of terminals is -connected to a root in a
directed/undirected graph if has internally-disjoint -paths for
every ; is -connected in if is -connected to every
. We consider the {\sf Subset -Connectivity Augmentation} problem:
given a graph with edge/node-costs, node subset , and
a subgraph of such that is -connected in , find a
minimum-cost augmenting edge-set such that is
-connected in . The problem admits trivial ratio .
We consider the case and prove that for directed/undirected graphs and
edge/node-costs, a -approximation for {\sf Rooted Subset -Connectivity
Augmentation} implies the following ratios for {\sf Subset -Connectivity
Augmentation}: (i) ; (ii) , where
b=1 for undirected graphs and b=2 for directed graphs, and is the th
harmonic number. The best known values of on undirected graphs are
for edge-costs and for
node-costs; for directed graphs for both versions. Our results imply
that unless , {\sf Subset -Connectivity Augmentation} admits
the same ratios as the best known ones for the rooted version. This improves
the ratios in \cite{N-focs,L}
Non-Uniform Robust Network Design in Planar Graphs
Robust optimization is concerned with constructing solutions that remain
feasible also when a limited number of resources is removed from the solution.
Most studies of robust combinatorial optimization to date made the assumption
that every resource is equally vulnerable, and that the set of scenarios is
implicitly given by a single budget constraint. This paper studies a robustness
model of a different kind. We focus on \textbf{bulk-robustness}, a model
recently introduced~\cite{bulk} for addressing the need to model non-uniform
failure patterns in systems.
We significantly extend the techniques used in~\cite{bulk} to design
approximation algorithm for bulk-robust network design problems in planar
graphs. Our techniques use an augmentation framework, combined with linear
programming (LP) rounding that depends on a planar embedding of the input
graph. A connection to cut covering problems and the dominating set problem in
circle graphs is established. Our methods use few of the specifics of
bulk-robust optimization, hence it is conceivable that they can be adapted to
solve other robust network design problems.Comment: 17 pages, 2 figure
- …