177,558 research outputs found

    On the non-existence of an R-labeling

    Full text link
    We present a family of Eulerian posets which does not have any R-labeling. The result uses a structure theorem for R-labelings of the butterfly poset.Comment: 6 pages, 1 figure. To appear in the journal Orde

    Multi-Sided Boundary Labeling

    Full text link
    In the Boundary Labeling problem, we are given a set of nn points, referred to as sites, inside an axis-parallel rectangle RR, and a set of nn pairwise disjoint rectangular labels that are attached to RR from the outside. The task is to connect the sites to the labels by non-intersecting rectilinear paths, so-called leaders, with at most one bend. In this paper, we study the Multi-Sided Boundary Labeling problem, with labels lying on at least two sides of the enclosing rectangle. We present a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a crossing-free leader layout if one exists. So far, such an algorithm has only been known for the cases in which labels lie on one side or on two opposite sides of RR (here a crossing-free solution always exists). The case where labels may lie on adjacent sides is more difficult. We present efficient algorithms for testing the existence of a crossing-free leader layout that labels all sites and also for maximizing the number of labeled sites in a crossing-free leader layout. For two-sided boundary labeling with adjacent sides, we further show how to minimize the total leader length in a crossing-free layout

    A Study on Topological Integer Additive Set-Labeling of Graphs

    Get PDF
    A set-labeling of a graph GG is an injective function f:V(G)→P(X)f:V(G)\to \mathcal{P}(X), where XX is a finite set and a set-indexer of GG is a set-labeling such that the induced function f⊕:E(G)→P(X)−{∅}f^{\oplus}:E(G)\to \mathcal{P}(X)-\{\emptyset\} defined by f⊕(uv)=f(u)⊕f(v)f^{\oplus}(uv) = f(u){\oplus}f(v) for every uv∈E(G)uv{\in} E(G) is also injective. Let GG be a graph and let XX be a non-empty set. A set-indexer f:V(G)→P(X)f:V(G)\to \mathcal{P}(X) is called a topological set-labeling of GG if f(V(G))f(V(G)) is a topology of XX. An integer additive set-labeling is an injective function f:V(G)→P(N0)f:V(G)\to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}_0), whose associated function f+:E(G)→P(N0)f^+:E(G)\to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}_0) is defined by f(uv)=f(u)+f(v),uv∈E(G)f(uv)=f(u)+f(v), uv\in E(G), where N0\mathbb{N}_0 is the set of all non-negative integers and P(N0)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}_0) is its power set. An integer additive set-indexer is an integer additive set-labeling such that the induced function f+:E(G)→P(N0)f^+:E(G) \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}_0) defined by f+(uv)=f(u)+f(v)f^+ (uv) = f(u)+ f(v) is also injective. In this paper, we extend the concepts of topological set-labeling of graphs to topological integer additive set-labeling of graphs.Comment: 16 pages, 7 figures, Accepted for publication. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1403.398

    The interplay between societal concerns and the regulatory frame on GM crops in the European Union

    Get PDF
    Recapitulating how genetic modification technology and its agro-food products aroused strong societal opposition in the European Union, this paper demonstrates how this opposition contributed to shape the European regulatory frame on GM crops. More specifically, it describes how this opposition contributed to a de facto moratorium on the commercialization of new GM crop events in the end of the nineties. From this period onwards, the regulatory frame has been continuously revised in order to slow down further erosion of public and market confidence. Various scientific and technical reforms were made to meet societal concerns relating to the safety of GM crops. In this context, the precautionary principle, environmental post-market monitoring and traceability were adopted as ways to cope with scientific uncertainties. Labeling, traceability, co-existence and public information were installed in an attempt to meet the general public request for more information about GM agro-food products, and the specific demand to respect the consumers' and farmers' freedom of choice. Despite these efforts, today, the explicit role of public participation and/or ethical consultation during authorization procedures is at best minimal. Moreover, no legal room was created to progress to an integral sustainability evaluation during market procedures. It remains to be seen whether the recent policy shift towards greater transparency about value judgments, plural viewpoints and scientific uncertainties will be one step forward in integrating ethical concerns more explicitly in risk analysis. As such, the regulatory frame stands open for further interpretation, reflecting in various degrees a continued interplay with societal concerns relating to GM agro-food products. In this regard, both societal concerns and diversely interpreted regulatory criteria can be inferred as signaling a request – and even a quest – to render more explicit the broader-than-scientific dimension of the actual risk analysis

    A Characterisation of Weak Integer Additive Set-Indexers of Graphs

    Get PDF
    An integer additive set-indexer is defined as an injective function f:V(G)→2N0f:V(G)\rightarrow 2^{\mathbb{N}_0} such that the induced function gf:E(G)→2N0g_f:E(G) \rightarrow 2^{\mathbb{N}_0} defined by gf(uv)=f(u)+f(v)g_f (uv) = f(u)+ f(v) is also injective. An integer additive set-indexer is said to be kk-uniform if ∣gf(e)∣=k|g_f(e)| = k for all e∈E(G)e\in E(G). An integer additive set-indexer ff is said to be a weak integer additive set-indexer if ∣gf(uv)∣=max(∣f(u)∣,∣f(v)∣)|g_f(uv)|=max(|f(u)|,|f(v)|) for all u,v∈V(G)u,v\in V(G). In this paper, we study the characteristics of certain graphs and graph classes which admit weak integer additive set-indexers.Comment: 12pages, 4 figures, arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1311.085

    A Creative Review on Integer Additive Set-Valued Graphs

    Full text link
    For a non-empty ground set XX, finite or infinite, the {\em set-valuation} or {\em set-labeling} of a given graph GG is an injective function f:V(G)→P(X)f:V(G) \to \mathcal{P}(X), where P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) is the power set of the set XX. A set-indexer of a graph GG is an injective set-valued function f:V(G)→P(X)f:V(G) \to \mathcal{P}(X) such that the function f∗:E(G)→P(X)−{∅}f^{\ast}:E(G)\to \mathcal{P}(X)-\{\emptyset\} defined by f∗(uv)=f(u)∗f(v)f^{\ast}(uv) = f(u){\ast} f(v) for every uv∈E(G)uv{\in} E(G) is also injective, where ∗\ast is a binary operation on sets. An integer additive set-indexer is defined as an injective function f:V(G)→P(N0)f:V(G)\to \mathcal{P}({\mathbb{N}_0}) such that the induced function f+:E(G)→P(N0)f^+:E(G) \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}_0) defined by f+(uv)=f(u)+f(v)f^+ (uv) = f(u)+ f(v) is also injective, where N0\mathbb{N}_0 is the set of all non-negative integers. In this paper, we critically and creatively review the concepts and properties of integer additive set-valued graphs.Comment: 14 pages, submitted. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1312.7672, arXiv:1312.767
    • …
    corecore