84,483 research outputs found
The Role of Deontic Logic in the Specification of Information Systems
In this paper we discuss the role that deontic logic plays in the specification of information systems, either because constraints on the systems directly concern norms or, and even more importantly, system constraints are considered ideal but violable (so-called `soft¿ constraints).\ud
To overcome the traditional problems with deontic logic (the so-called paradoxes), we first state the importance of distinguishing between ought-to-be and ought-to-do constraints and next focus on the most severe paradox, the so-called Chisholm paradox, involving contrary-to-duty norms. We present a multi-modal extension of standard deontic logic (SDL) to represent the ought-to-be version of the Chisholm set properly. For the ought-to-do variant we employ a reduction to dynamic logic, and show how the Chisholm set can be treated adequately in this setting. Finally we discuss a way of integrating both ought-to-be and ought-to-do reasoning, enabling one to draw conclusions from ought-to-be constraints to ought-to-do ones, and show by an example the use(fulness) of this
Justification for inclusion dependency normal form
Functional dependencies (FDs) and inclusion dependencies (INDs) are the most fundamental integrity constraints that arise in practice in relational databases. In this paper, we address the issue of normalization in the presence of FDs and INDs and, in particular, the semantic justification for Inclusion Dependency Normal Form (IDNF), a normal form which combines Boyce-Codd normal form with the restriction on the INDs that they be noncircular and key-based. We motivate and formalize three goals of database design in the presence of FDs and INDs: noninteraction between FDs and INDs, elimination of redundancy and update anomalies, and preservation of entity integrity. We show that, as for FDs, in the presence of INDs being free of redundancy is equivalent to being free of update anomalies. Then, for each of these properties, we derive equivalent syntactic conditions on the database design. Individually, each of these syntactic conditions is weaker than IDNF and the restriction that an FD not be embedded in the righthand side of an IND is common to three of the conditions. However, we also show that, for these three goals of database design to be satisfied simultaneously, IDNF is both a necessary and sufficient condition
Active Integrity Constraints and Revision Programming
We study active integrity constraints and revision programming, two
formalisms designed to describe integrity constraints on databases and to
specify policies on preferred ways to enforce them. Unlike other more commonly
accepted approaches, these two formalisms attempt to provide a declarative
solution to the problem. However, the original semantics of founded repairs for
active integrity constraints and justified revisions for revision programs
differ. Our main goal is to establish a comprehensive framework of semantics
for active integrity constraints, to find a parallel framework for revision
programs, and to relate the two. By doing so, we demonstrate that the two
formalisms proposed independently of each other and based on different
intuitions when viewed within a broader semantic framework turn out to be
notational variants of each other. That lends support to the adequacy of the
semantics we develop for each of the formalisms as the foundation for a
declarative approach to the problem of database update and repair. In the paper
we also study computational properties of the semantics we consider and
establish results concerned with the concept of the minimality of change and
the invariance under the shifting transformation.Comment: 48 pages, 3 figure
- …