31,837 research outputs found

    Statistical hyperbolicity in groups

    Full text link
    In this paper, we introduce a geometric statistic called the "sprawl" of a group with respect to a generating set, based on the average distance in the word metric between pairs of words of equal length. The sprawl quantifies a certain obstruction to hyperbolicity. Group presentations with maximum sprawl (i.e., without this obstruction) are called statistically hyperbolic. We first relate sprawl to curvature and show that nonelementary hyperbolic groups are statistically hyperbolic, then give some results for products, for Diestel-Leader graphs and lamplighter groups. In free abelian groups, the word metrics asymptotically approach norms induced by convex polytopes, causing the study of sprawl to reduce to a problem in convex geometry. We present an algorithm that computes sprawl exactly for any generating set, thus quantifying the failure of various presentations of Z^d to be hyperbolic. This leads to a conjecture about the extreme values, with a connection to the classic Mahler conjecture.Comment: 14 pages, 5 figures. This is split off from the paper "The geometry of spheres in free abelian groups.

    A New Lower Bound for Semigroup Orthogonal Range Searching

    Get PDF
    We report the first improvement in the space-time trade-off of lower bounds for the orthogonal range searching problem in the semigroup model, since Chazelle's result from 1990. This is one of the very fundamental problems in range searching with a long history. Previously, Andrew Yao's influential result had shown that the problem is already non-trivial in one dimension~\cite{Yao-1Dlb}: using mm units of space, the query time Q(n)Q(n) must be Ω(α(m,n)+nmn+1)\Omega( \alpha(m,n) + \frac{n}{m-n+1}) where α(,)\alpha(\cdot,\cdot) is the inverse Ackermann's function, a very slowly growing function. In dd dimensions, Bernard Chazelle~\cite{Chazelle.LB.II} proved that the query time must be Q(n)=Ω((logβn)d1)Q(n) = \Omega( (\log_\beta n)^{d-1}) where β=2m/n\beta = 2m/n. Chazelle's lower bound is known to be tight for when space consumption is `high' i.e., m=Ω(nlogd+εn)m = \Omega(n \log^{d+\varepsilon}n). We have two main results. The first is a lower bound that shows Chazelle's lower bound was not tight for `low space': we prove that we must have m(n)=Ω(n(lognloglogn)d1)m (n) = \Omega(n (\log n \log\log n)^{d-1}). Our lower bound does not close the gap to the existing data structures, however, our second result is that our analysis is tight. Thus, we believe the gap is in fact natural since lower bounds are proven for idempotent semigroups while the data structures are built for general semigroups and thus they cannot assume (and use) the properties of an idempotent semigroup. As a result, we believe to close the gap one must study lower bounds for non-idempotent semigroups or building data structures for idempotent semigroups. We develope significantly new ideas for both of our results that could be useful in pursuing either of these directions

    Quantum Crystals and Spin Chains

    Get PDF
    In this note, we discuss the quantum version of the melting crystal corner in one, two, and three dimensions, generalizing the treatment for the quantum dimer model. Using a mapping to spin chains we find that the two--dimensional case (growth of random partitions) is integrable and leads directly to the Hamiltonian of the Heisenberg XXZ ferromagnet. The three--dimensional case of the melting crystal corner is described in terms of a system of coupled XXZ spin chains. We give a conjecture for its mass gap and analyze the system numerically.Comment: 34 pages, 26 picture
    corecore