On the relative expressiveness of higher-order session processes

By integrating constructs from the λ-calculus and the π-calculus, in higher-order process calculi exchanged values may contain processes. This paper studies the relative expressiveness of HOπ, the higher-order π-calculus in which communications are governed by session types. Our main discovery is that HO, a subcalculus of HOπ which lacks name-passing and recursion, can serve as a new core calculus for session-typed higher-order concurrency. By exploring a new bisimulation for HO, we show that HO can encode HOπ fully abstractly (up to typed contextual equivalence) more precisely and efficiently than the first-order session π-calculus (π). Overall, under session types, HOπ, HO, and π are equally expressive; however, HOπ and HO are more tightly related than HOπ and π

Parameterized Concurrent Multi-Party Session Types

Session types have been proposed as a means of statically verifying implementations of communication protocols. Although prior work has been successful in verifying some classes of protocols, it does not cope well with parameterized, multi-actor scenarios with inherent asynchrony. For example, the sliding window protocol is inexpressible in previously proposed session type systems. This paper describes System-A, a new typing language which overcomes many of the expressiveness limitations of prior work. System-A explicitly supports asynchrony and parallelism, as well as multiple forms of parameterization. We define System-A and show how it can be used for the static verification of a large class of asynchronous communication protocols.Comment: In Proceedings FOCLASA 2012, arXiv:1208.432

Programming with heterogeneous structures: Manipulating XML data using bondi

Manipulating semistructured data, such as XML, does not fit well within conventional programming languages. A typical manipulation requires finding all occurrences of a structure matching a structured search pattern, whose context may be different in different places, and both aspects cause difficulty. If a special-purpose query language is used to manipulate XML, an interface to a more general programming environment is required, and this interface typically creates runtime overhead for type conversion. However, adding XML manipulation to a general-purpose programming language has proven difficult because of problems associated with expressiveness and typing. We show an alternative approach that handles many kinds of patterns within an existing strongly-typed general-purpose programming language called bondi. The key ideas are to express complex search patterns as structures of simple patterns, pass these complex patterns as parameters to generic data-processing functions and traverse heterogeneous data structures by a generalized form of pattern matching. These ideas are made possible by the language's support for pattern calculus, whose typing on structures and patterns enables path and pattern polymorphism. With this approach, adding a new kind of pattern is just a matter of programming, not language design. Copyright © 2006, Australian Computer Society, Inc