7,961 research outputs found

    On the Efficiency of Atomic Multi-reader, Multi-writer Distributed Memory

    Full text link
    This paper considers quorum-replicated, multi-writer, multi-reader (MWMR) implementations of surviv-able atomic registers in a distributed message-passing system with processors prone to failures. Previous implementations in such settings invariably required two rounds of communication between readers/writers and replica owners. Hence the question arises whether it is possible to have single round read and/or write operations in this setting. As a first step, we present an algorithm, called CWFR, that allows the classic two round write operations, while supporting single round read operations. Since multiple write operations may be concurrent with a read operation, this algorithm involves an iterative (local) discovery of the latest completed write operation. This algorithm precipitates the question of whether fast (single round) writes may co-exist with fast reads. We thus devise a second algorithm, called SFW, that exploits a new technique called server side ordering (SSO), which –unlike previous approaches – places partial responsibility for the ordering of write operations on the replica owners (the servers). With SSO, fast write operations are introduced for the very first time in the MWMR setting. While this is possible, we show that under certain conditions the MWMR model imposes in-herent limitations on any quorum-based fast write implementation of a safe read/write register and potentiall

    A Wait-free Multi-word Atomic (1,N) Register for Large-scale Data Sharing on Multi-core Machines

    Get PDF
    We present a multi-word atomic (1,N) register for multi-core machines exploiting Read-Modify-Write (RMW) instructions to coordinate the writer and the readers in a wait-free manner. Our proposal, called Anonymous Readers Counting (ARC), enables large-scale data sharing by admitting up to 232−22^{32}-2 concurrent readers on off-the-shelf 64-bits machines, as opposed to the most advanced RMW-based approach which is limited to 58 readers. Further, ARC avoids multiple copies of the register content when accessing it---this affects classical register's algorithms based on atomic read/write operations on single words. Thus it allows for higher scalability with respect to the register size. Moreover, ARC explicitly reduces improves performance via a proper limitation of RMW instructions in case of read operations, and by supporting constant time for read operations and amortized constant time for write operations. A proof of correctness of our register algorithm is also provided, together with experimental data for a comparison with literature proposals. Beyond assessing ARC on physical platforms, we carry out as well an experimentation on virtualized infrastructures, which shows the resilience of wait-free synchronization as provided by ARC with respect to CPU-steal times, proper of more modern paradigms such as cloud computing.Comment: non

    Time-Efficient Read/Write Register in Crash-prone Asynchronous Message-Passing Systems

    Get PDF
    The atomic register is certainly the most basic object of computing science. Its implementation on top of an n-process asynchronous message-passing system has received a lot of attention. It has been shown that t \textless{} n/2 (where t is the maximal number of processes that may crash) is a necessary and sufficient requirement to build an atomic register on top of a crash-prone asynchronous message-passing system. Considering such a context, this paper visits the notion of a fast implementation of an atomic register, and presents a new time-efficient asynchronous algorithm. Its time-efficiency is measured according to two different underlying synchrony assumptions. Whatever this assumption, a write operation always costs a round-trip delay, while a read operation costs always a round-trip delay in favorable circumstances (intuitively, when it is not concurrent with a write). When designing this algorithm, the design spirit was to be as close as possible to the one of the famous ABD algorithm (proposed by Attiya, Bar-Noy, and Dolev)
    • 

    corecore