Intuitionistic G\"odel-L\"ob logic, \`a la Simpson: labelled systems and birelational semantics

We derive an intuitionistic version of G\"odel-L\"ob modal logic ($\sf{GL}$) in the style of Simpson, via proof theoretic techniques. We recover a labelled system, $\sf{\ell IGL}$, by restricting a non-wellfounded labelled system for $\sf{GL}$ to have only one formula on the right. The latter is obtained using techniques from cyclic proof theory, sidestepping the barrier that $\sf{GL}$'s usual frame condition (converse well-foundedness) is not first-order definable. While existing intuitionistic versions of $\sf{GL}$ are typically defined over only the box (and not the diamond), our presentation includes both modalities. Our main result is that $\sf{\ell IGL}$ coincides with a corresponding semantic condition in birelational semantics: the composition of the modal relation and the intuitionistic relation is conversely well-founded. We call the resulting logic $\sf{IGL}$. While the soundness direction is proved using standard ideas, the completeness direction is more complex and necessitates a detour through several intermediate characterisations of $\sf{IGL}$.Comment: 25 pages including 8 pages appendix, 4 figure

The intensional side of algebraic-topological representation theorems

Stone representation theorems are a central ingredient in the metatheory of philosophical logics and are used to establish modal embedding results in a general but indirect and non-constructive way. Their use in logical embeddings will be reviewed and it will be shown how they can be circumvented in favour of direct and constructive arguments through the methods of analytic proof theory, and how the intensional part of the representation results can be recovered from the syntactic proof of those embeddings. Analytic methods will also be used to establish the embedding of subintuitionistic logics into the corresponding modal logics. Finally, proof-theoretic embeddings will be interpreted as a reduction of classes of word problems.Peer reviewe

Intuitionistic Layered Graph Logic: Semantics and Proof Theory

Models of complex systems are widely used in the physical and social sciences, and the concept of layering, typically building upon graph-theoretic structure, is a common feature. We describe an intuitionistic substructural logic called ILGL that gives an account of layering. The logic is a bunched system, combining the usual intuitionistic connectives, together with a non-commutative, non-associative conjunction (used to capture layering) and its associated implications. We give soundness and completeness theorems for a labelled tableaux system with respect to a Kripke semantics on graphs. We then give an equivalent relational semantics, itself proven equivalent to an algebraic semantics via a representation theorem. We utilise this result in two ways. First, we prove decidability of the logic by showing the finite embeddability property holds for the algebraic semantics. Second, we prove a Stone-type duality theorem for the logic. By introducing the notions of ILGL hyperdoctrine and indexed layered frame we are able to extend this result to a predicate version of the logic and prove soundness and completeness theorems for an extension of the layered graph semantics . We indicate the utility of predicate ILGL with a resource-labelled bigraph model

A Tableau Proof System with Names for Modal Mu-calculus

Fixpoints are an important ingredient in semantics, abstract interpretation and program logics. Their addition to a logic can add considerable expressive power. One general issue is how to define proof systems for such logics. Here we examine proof systems for modal logic with fixpoints. We present a tableau proof system for checking validity of formulas which uses names to keep track of unfoldings of fixpoint variables as devised by Jungteerapanich

A Substructural Epistemic Resource Logic: Theory and Modelling Applications

We present a substructural epistemic logic, based on Boolean BI, in which the epistemic modalities are parametrized on agents' local resources. The new modalities can be seen as generalizations of the usual epistemic modalities. The logic combines Boolean BI's resource semantics --- we introduce BI and its resource semantics at some length --- with epistemic agency. We illustrate the use of the logic in systems modelling by discussing some examples about access control, including semaphores, using resource tokens. We also give a labelled tableaux calculus and establish soundness and completeness with respect to the resource semantics

Constructivisation through Induction and Conservation

The topic of this thesis lies in the intersection between proof theory and alge- braic logic. The main object of discussion, constructive reasoning, was intro- duced at the beginning of the 20th century by Brouwer, who followed Kant’s explanation of human intuition of spacial forms and time points: these are constructed step by step in a finite process by certain rules, mimicking con- structions with straightedge and compass and the construction of natural numbers, respectively. The aim of the present thesis is to show how classical reasoning, which admits some forms of indirect reasoning, can be made more constructive. The central tool that we are using are induction principles, methods that cap- ture infinite collections of objects by considering their process of generation instead of the whole class. We start by studying the interplay between cer- tain structures that satisfy induction and the calculi for some non-classical logics. We then use inductive methods to prove a few conservation theorems, which contribute to answering the question of which parts of classical logic and mathematics can be made constructive.Tämän opinnäytetyön aiheena on todistusteorian ja algebrallisen logiikan leikkauspiste. Keskustelun pääaiheen, rakentavan päättelyn, esitteli 1900-luvun alussa Brouwer, joka seurasi Kantin selitystä ihmisen intuitiosta tilamuodoista ja aikapisteistä: nämä rakennetaan askel askeleelta äärellisessä prosessissa tiettyjen sääntöjen mukaan, jotka jäljittelevät suoran ja kompassin konstruktioita ja luonnollisten lukujen konstruktiota. Tämän opinnäytetyön tavoitteena on osoittaa, kuinka klassista päättelyä, joka mahdollistaa tietyt epäsuoran päättelyn muodot, voidaan tehdä rakentavammaksi. Keskeinen työkalu, jota käytämme, ovat induktioperiaatteet, menetelmät, jotka keräävät äärettömiä objektikokoelmia ottamalla huomioon niiden luomisprosessin koko luokan sijaan. Aloitamme tutkimalla vuorovaikutusta tiettyjen induktiota tyydyttävien rakenteiden ja joidenkin ei-klassisten logiikan laskelmien välillä. Todistamme sitten induktiivisten menetelmien avulla muutamia säilymislauseita, jotka auttavat vastaamaan kysymykseen siitä, mitkä klassisen logiikan ja matematiikan osat voidaan tehdä rakentaviksi