A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid

The main advances regarding the use of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid over the last decade are reviewed. They concern mainly a bipolar extension of both the Choquet integral and the Sugeno integral, interesting particular submodels, new learning techniques, a better interpretation of the models and a better use of the Choquet integral in multi-criteria decision aid. Parallel to these theoretical works, the Choquet integral has been applied to many new fields, and several softwares and libraries dedicated to this model have been developed.Choquet integral, Sugeno integral, capacity, bipolarity, preferences

Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA

This chapter aims at a unified presentation of various methods of MCDA based onfuzzy measures (capacity) and fuzzy integrals, essentially the Choquet andSugeno integral. A first section sets the position of the problem ofmulticriteria decision making, and describes the various possible scales ofmeasurement (difference, ratio, and ordinal). Then a whole section is devotedto each case in detail: after introducing necessary concepts, the methodologyis described, and the problem of the practical identification of fuzzy measuresis given. The important concept of interaction between criteria, central inthis chapter, is explained in details. It is shown how it leads to k-additivefuzzy measures. The case of bipolar scales leads to thegeneral model based on bi-capacities, encompassing usual models based oncapacities. A general definition of interaction for bipolar scales isintroduced. The case of ordinal scales leads to the use of Sugeno integral, andits symmetrized version when one considers symmetric ordinal scales. Apractical methodology for the identification of fuzzy measures in this contextis given. Lastly, we give a short description of some practical applications.Choquet integral; fuzzy measure; interaction; bi-capacities

Intangibles mismeasurements, synergy, and accounting numbers : a note.

For the last two decades, authors (e.g. Ohlson, 1995; Lev, 2000, 2001) have regularly pointed out the enforcement of limitations by traditional accounting frameworks on financial reporting informativeness. Consistent with this claim, it has been then argued that accounting finds one of its major limits in not allowing for direct recognition of synergy occurring amongst the firm intangible and tangible items (Casta, 1994; Casta & Lesage, 2001). Although the firm synergy phenomenon has been widely documented in the recent accounting literature (see for instance, Hand & Lev, 2004; Lev, 2001) research hitherto has failed to provide a clear approach to assess directly and account for such a henceforth fundamental corporate factor. The objective of this paper is to raise and examine, but not address exhaustively, the specific issues induced by modelling the synergy occurring amongst the firm assets whilst pointing out the limits of traditional accounting valuation tools. Since financial accounting valuation methods are mostly based on the mathematical property of additivity, and consequently may occult the perspective of regarding the firm as an organized set of assets, we propose an alternative valuation approach based on non-additive measures issued from the Choquet's (1953) and Sugeno's (1997) framework. More precisely, we show how this integration technique with respect to a non-additive measure can be used to cope with either positive or negative synergy in a firm value-building process and then discuss its potential future implications for financial reporting.Financial reporting; accounting goodwill; assets synergy; non-additive measures; Choquet’s framework;

On the Extension of Pseudo-Boolean Functions for the Aggregation of Interacting Criteria

The paper presents an analysis on the use of integrals defined for non-additive measures (or capacities) as the Choquet and the \Sipos{} integral, and the multilinear model, all seen as extensions of pseudo-Boolean functions, and used as a means to model interaction between criteria in a multicriteria decision making problem. The emphasis is put on the use, besides classical comparative information, of information about difference of attractiveness between acts, and on the existence, for each point of view, of a ``neutral level'', allowing to introduce the absolute notion of attractive or repulsive act. It is shown that in this case, the Sipos integral is a suitable solution, although not unique. Properties of the Sipos integral as a new way of aggregating criteria are shown, with emphasis on the interaction among criteria.

Synergy Modelling and Financial Valuation : the contribution of Fuzzy Integrals.

Les méthodes d’évaluation financière utilisent des opérateurs d’agrégation reposant sur les propriétés d’additivité (sommations, intégrales de Lebesgue). De ce fait, elles occultent les phénomènes de renforcement et de synergie (ou de redondance) qui peuvent exister entre les éléments d’un ensemble organisé. C’est particulièrement le cas en ce qui concerne le problème d’évaluation financière du patrimoine d’une entreprise : en effet, en pratique, il est souvent mis en évidence une importante différence de valorisation entre l’approche « valeur de la somme des éléments » (privilégiant le point de vue financier) et l’approche « somme de la valeur des différents éléments » (privilégiant le point de vue comptable). Les possibilités offertes par des opérateurs d’agrégation comme les intégrales floues (Sugeno, Grabisch, Choquet) permettent, au plan théorique, de modéliser l’effet de synergie. La présente étude se propose de valider empiriquement les modalités d’implémentation opérationnelle de ce modèle à partir d’un échantillon d’entreprises cotées ayant fait l’objet d’une évaluation lors d’une OPA.Financial valuation methods use additive aggregation operators. But a patrimony should be regarded as an organized set, and additivity makes it impossible for these aggregation operators to formalize such phenomena as synergy or mutual inhibition between the patrimony’s components. This paper considers the application of fuzzy measure and fuzzy integrals (Sugeno, Grabisch, Choquet) to financial valuation. More specifically, we show how integration with respect to a non additive measure can be used to handle positive or negative synergy in value construction.Fuzzy measure; Fuzzy integral; Aggregation operator; Synergy; Financial valuation;

The Symmetric Sugeno Integral

We propose an extension of the Sugeno integral for negative numbers, in the spirit of the symmetric extension of Choquet integral, also called \Sipos\ integral. Our framework is purely ordinal, since the Sugeno integral has its interest when the underlying structure is ordinal. We begin by defining negative numbers on a linearly ordered set, and we endow this new structure with a suitable algebra, very close to the ring of real numbers. In a second step, we introduce the Möbius transform on this new structure. Lastly, we define the symmetric Sugeno integral, and show its similarity with the symmetric Choquet integral.

Обгрунтування методики оцінювання стійкості функціонування фондового ринку України

У статті проаналізовано існуючі методики оцінки стійкості функціонування систем різних рівнів. Проведено порівняння методик та визначено доцільність їх застосування для визначення стійкості функціонування фондового ринку України. Визначено критерії, яким повинні відповідати методики оцінки стійкості функціонування фондового ринку.В статье проанализированы существующие методики оценки устойчивости функционирования систем различных уровней. Проведено сравнение методик и определена целесообразность их применения для определения устойчивости функционирования фондового рынка Украины. Определены критерии, которым должны соответствовать методики оценки устойчивости функционирования фондового рынка.The existing methods of evaluation of stability of function of systems of different levels have been analyzed in the article. Thus, the attention is paid to the works of N.Viner who first described and solved the most important task on the search of the structure of optimized management system, that is the task of synthesis of optimized system. In return, Kahlman offered the other view of solution of the task of construction of optimized management system, different from N. Viner’s one. Such a presentation of solution in the form of a closed loop system, similar in its kind to the forming filter, had large prospects of success. V.V.Novozhilov states that the purpose of his modeling is the stability of technological system, calculating its reliability and safety. The structure modeling and the graph theory are used as the tools. V.P. Bocharnikov suggests defining the stability of judgments as for taking the management decision in market researches, using the theory of fuzzy measures, Fuzzy-technology in Excel sphere. S.V. Glivenko suggests using the theory of fuzzy measures and integrals in order to define the stable process of forecasting. A.V. Leonenkov, M.L. Krichevskiy and V.V. Borisova prefer the Theories of fuzzy sets, the method of fuzzy logic for evaluation of uncertainty of stability in Mathlab sphere. The performed comparison of methods defines the reasonability of their implementation in order to define the stability of the stock market’s function in Ukraine. It also allows to give preference to fuzzy logic since this mathematic theory has a number of advantages including the following: it allows to work out rapidly the prototype of the system based on expert evaluation with further complication of its function; the model based on fuzzy inference is more transparent (easier to understand) than the similar model based on differential or other equations; fuzzy models are easier to operate by hardware, and at the same time it is possible to separate calculations. The criteria to which the methods of evaluation of stability of the stock market’s function should correspond are also defined, and the conclusions have been made