4,054 research outputs found
Complexity Theory, Game Theory, and Economics: The Barbados Lectures
This document collects the lecture notes from my mini-course "Complexity
Theory, Game Theory, and Economics," taught at the Bellairs Research Institute
of McGill University, Holetown, Barbados, February 19--23, 2017, as the 29th
McGill Invitational Workshop on Computational Complexity.
The goal of this mini-course is twofold: (i) to explain how complexity theory
has helped illuminate several barriers in economics and game theory; and (ii)
to illustrate how game-theoretic questions have led to new and interesting
complexity theory, including recent several breakthroughs. It consists of two
five-lecture sequences: the Solar Lectures, focusing on the communication and
computational complexity of computing equilibria; and the Lunar Lectures,
focusing on applications of complexity theory in game theory and economics. No
background in game theory is assumed.Comment: Revised v2 from December 2019 corrects some errors in and adds some
recent citations to v1 Revised v3 corrects a few typos in v
The Agglomeration Vickrey Auction for the promotion of spatially contiguous habitat management: Theoretical foundations and numerical illustrations
There is much interest among economists and policy makers in the use of reverse auctions to purchase habitat conservation on private lands as a mechanism for minimizing public expenditures to achieve desired conservation outcomes. Examples are the Conservation Reserve Program (US) and Environmental Stewardship Scheme (UK). An important limitation of these auctions as implemented to date is that there is no explicit consideration of the spatial pattern of participation in the evaluation of bids. In this study we present the structure of a simple auction – the Agglomeration Vickrey Auction that implements a Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism. The auction is designed to attain conservation goals through specific spatial patterns of land management while minimizing the total budgetary cost. We present the theoretical structure of the AVA and provide simple numerical examples to illustrate the effectiveness of the mechanism. We conclude with a section documenting the experiments that are to be conducted as a part of the future research on this study.auctions, environmental conservation, spatial, Environmental Economics and Policy, Land Economics/Use,
Improved Revenue Bounds for Posted-Price and Second-Price Mechanisms
We study revenue maximization through sequential posted-price (SPP)
mechanisms in single-dimensional settings with buyers and independent but
not necessarily identical value distributions. We construct the SPP mechanisms
by considering the best of two simple pricing rules: one that imitates the
revenue optimal mchanism, namely the Myersonian mechanism, via the taxation
principle and the other that posts a uniform price. Our pricing rules are
rather generalizable and yield the first improvement over long-established
approximation factors in several settings. We design factor-revealing
mathematical programs that crisply capture the approximation factor of our SPP
mechanism. In the single-unit setting, our SPP mechanism yields a better
approximation factor than the state of the art prior to our work (Azar,
Chiplunkar & Kaplan, 2018). In the multi-unit setting, our SPP mechanism yields
the first improved approximation factor over the state of the art after over
nine years (Yan, 2011 and Chakraborty et al., 2010). Our results on SPP
mechanisms immediately imply improved performance guarantees for the equivalent
free-order prophet inequality problem. In the position auction setting, our SPP
mechanism yields the first higher-than approximation factor. In eager
second-price (ESP) auctions, our two simple pricing rules lead to the first
improved approximation factor that is strictly greater than what is obtained by
the SPP mechanism in the single-unit setting.Comment: Accepted to Operations Researc
Algorithms as Mechanisms: The Price of Anarchy of Relax-and-Round
Many algorithms that are originally designed without explicitly considering
incentive properties are later combined with simple pricing rules and used as
mechanisms. The resulting mechanisms are often natural and simple to
understand. But how good are these algorithms as mechanisms? Truthful reporting
of valuations is typically not a dominant strategy (certainly not with a
pay-your-bid, first-price rule, but it is likely not a good strategy even with
a critical value, or second-price style rule either). Our goal is to show that
a wide class of approximation algorithms yields this way mechanisms with low
Price of Anarchy.
The seminal result of Lucier and Borodin [SODA 2010] shows that combining a
greedy algorithm that is an -approximation algorithm with a
pay-your-bid payment rule yields a mechanism whose Price of Anarchy is
. In this paper we significantly extend the class of algorithms for
which such a result is available by showing that this close connection between
approximation ratio on the one hand and Price of Anarchy on the other also
holds for the design principle of relaxation and rounding provided that the
relaxation is smooth and the rounding is oblivious.
We demonstrate the far-reaching consequences of our result by showing its
implications for sparse packing integer programs, such as multi-unit auctions
and generalized matching, for the maximum traveling salesman problem, for
combinatorial auctions, and for single source unsplittable flow problems. In
all these problems our approach leads to novel simple, near-optimal mechanisms
whose Price of Anarchy either matches or beats the performance guarantees of
known mechanisms.Comment: Extended abstract appeared in Proc. of 16th ACM Conference on
Economics and Computation (EC'15
Algorithmic Bayesian Persuasion
Persuasion, defined as the act of exploiting an informational advantage in
order to effect the decisions of others, is ubiquitous. Indeed, persuasive
communication has been estimated to account for almost a third of all economic
activity in the US. This paper examines persuasion through a computational
lens, focusing on what is perhaps the most basic and fundamental model in this
space: the celebrated Bayesian persuasion model of Kamenica and Gentzkow. Here
there are two players, a sender and a receiver. The receiver must take one of a
number of actions with a-priori unknown payoff, and the sender has access to
additional information regarding the payoffs. The sender can commit to
revealing a noisy signal regarding the realization of the payoffs of various
actions, and would like to do so as to maximize her own payoff assuming a
perfectly rational receiver.
We examine the sender's optimization task in three of the most natural input
models for this problem, and essentially pin down its computational complexity
in each. When the payoff distributions of the different actions are i.i.d. and
given explicitly, we exhibit a polynomial-time (exact) algorithm, and a
"simple" -approximation algorithm. Our optimal scheme for the i.i.d.
setting involves an analogy to auction theory, and makes use of Border's
characterization of the space of reduced-forms for single-item auctions. When
action payoffs are independent but non-identical with marginal distributions
given explicitly, we show that it is #P-hard to compute the optimal expected
sender utility. Finally, we consider a general (possibly correlated) joint
distribution of action payoffs presented by a black box sampling oracle, and
exhibit a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) with a bi-criteria
guarantee. We show that this result is the best possible in the black-box model
for information-theoretic reasons
- …