4,988 research outputs found
Optimal Competitive Auctions
We study the design of truthful auctions for selling identical items in
unlimited supply (e.g., digital goods) to n unit demand buyers. This classic
problem stands out from profit-maximizing auction design literature as it
requires no probabilistic assumptions on buyers' valuations and employs the
framework of competitive analysis. Our objective is to optimize the worst-case
performance of an auction, measured by the ratio between a given benchmark and
revenue generated by the auction.
We establish a sufficient and necessary condition that characterizes
competitive ratios for all monotone benchmarks. The characterization identifies
the worst-case distribution of instances and reveals intrinsic relations
between competitive ratios and benchmarks in the competitive analysis. With the
characterization at hand, we show optimal competitive auctions for two natural
benchmarks.
The most well-studied benchmark measures the
envy-free optimal revenue where at least two buyers win. Goldberg et al. [13]
showed a sequence of lower bounds on the competitive ratio for each number of
buyers n. They conjectured that all these bounds are tight. We show that
optimal competitive auctions match these bounds. Thus, we confirm the
conjecture and settle a central open problem in the design of digital goods
auctions. As one more application we examine another economically meaningful
benchmark, which measures the optimal revenue across all limited-supply Vickrey
auctions. We identify the optimal competitive ratios to be
for each number of buyers n, that is as
approaches infinity
Online Independent Set Beyond the Worst-Case: Secretaries, Prophets, and Periods
We investigate online algorithms for maximum (weight) independent set on
graph classes with bounded inductive independence number like, e.g., interval
and disk graphs with applications to, e.g., task scheduling and spectrum
allocation. In the online setting, it is assumed that nodes of an unknown graph
arrive one by one over time. An online algorithm has to decide whether an
arriving node should be included into the independent set. Unfortunately, this
natural and practically relevant online problem cannot be studied in a
meaningful way within a classical competitive analysis as the competitive ratio
on worst-case input sequences is lower bounded by .
As a worst-case analysis is pointless, we study online independent set in a
stochastic analysis. Instead of focussing on a particular stochastic input
model, we present a generic sampling approach that enables us to devise online
algorithms achieving performance guarantees for a variety of input models. In
particular, our analysis covers stochastic input models like the secretary
model, in which an adversarial graph is presented in random order, and the
prophet-inequality model, in which a randomly generated graph is presented in
adversarial order. Our sampling approach bridges thus between stochastic input
models of quite different nature. In addition, we show that our approach can be
applied to a practically motivated admission control setting.
Our sampling approach yields an online algorithm for maximum independent set
with competitive ratio with respect to all of the mentioned
stochastic input models. for graph classes with inductive independence number
. The approach can be extended towards maximum-weight independent set by
losing only a factor of in the competitive ratio with denoting
the (expected) number of nodes
Improved Online Algorithms for Knapsack and GAP in the Random Order Model
The knapsack problem is one of the classical problems in combinatorial optimization: Given a set of items, each specified by its size and profit, the goal is to find a maximum profit packing into a knapsack of bounded capacity. In the online setting, items are revealed one by one and the decision, if the current item is packed or discarded forever, must be done immediately and irrevocably upon arrival. We study the online variant in the random order model where the input sequence is a uniform random permutation of the item set.
We develop a randomized (1/6.65)-competitive algorithm for this problem, outperforming the current best algorithm of competitive ratio 1/8.06 [Kesselheim et al. SIAM J. Comp. 47(5)]. Our algorithm is based on two new insights: We introduce a novel algorithmic approach that employs two given algorithms, optimized for restricted item classes, sequentially on the input sequence. In addition, we study and exploit the relationship of the knapsack problem to the 2-secretary problem.
The generalized assignment problem (GAP) includes, besides the knapsack problem, several important problems related to scheduling and matching. We show that in the same online setting, applying the proposed sequential approach yields a (1/6.99)-competitive randomized algorithm for GAP. Again, our proposed algorithm outperforms the current best result of competitive ratio 1/8.06 [Kesselheim et al. SIAM J. Comp. 47(5)]
The Timing of Bid Placement and Extent of Multiple Bidding: An Empirical Investigation Using eBay Online Auctions
Online auctions are fast gaining popularity in today's electronic commerce.
Relative to offline auctions, there is a greater degree of multiple bidding and
late bidding in online auctions, an empirical finding by some recent research.
These two behaviors (multiple bidding and late bidding) are of ``strategic''
importance to online auctions and hence important to investigate. In this
article we empirically measure the distribution of bid timings and the extent
of multiple bidding in a large set of online auctions, using bidder experience
as a mediating variable. We use data from the popular auction site
\url{www.eBay.com} to investigate more than 10,000 auctions from 15 consumer
product categories. We estimate the distribution of late bidding and multiple
bidding, which allows us to place these product categories along a continuum of
these metrics (the extent of late bidding and the extent of multiple bidding).
Interestingly, the results of the analysis distinguish most of the product
categories from one another with respect to these metrics, implying that
product categories, after controlling for bidder experience, differ in the
extent of multiple bidding and late bidding observed in them. We also find a
nonmonotonic impact of bidder experience on the timing of bid placements.
Experienced bidders are ``more'' active either toward the close of auction or
toward the start of auction. The impact of experience on the extent of multiple
bidding, though, is monotonic across the auction interval; more experienced
bidders tend to indulge ``less'' in multiple bidding.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/088342306000000123 in the
Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Packing Returning Secretaries
We study online secretary problems with returns in combinatorial packing
domains with candidates that arrive sequentially over time in random order.
The goal is to accept a feasible packing of candidates of maximum total value.
In the first variant, each candidate arrives exactly twice. All arrivals
occur in random order. We propose a simple 0.5-competitive algorithm that can
be combined with arbitrary approximation algorithms for the packing domain,
even when the total value of candidates is a subadditive function. For
bipartite matching, we obtain an algorithm with competitive ratio at least
for growing , and an algorithm with ratio at least
for all . We extend all algorithms and ratios to arrivals
per candidate.
In the second variant, there is a pool of undecided candidates. In each
round, a random candidate from the pool arrives. Upon arrival a candidate can
be either decided (accept/reject) or postponed (returned into the pool). We
mainly focus on minimizing the expected number of postponements when computing
an optimal solution. An expected number of is always
sufficient. For matroids, we show that the expected number can be reduced to
, where is the minimum of the ranks of matroid and
dual matroid. For bipartite matching, we show a bound of , where
is the size of the optimum matching. For general packing, we show a lower
bound of , even when the size of the optimum is .Comment: 23 pages, 5 figure
- …