Formal Languages in Dynamical Systems

We treat here the interrelation between formal languages and those dynamical systems that can be described by cellular automata (CA). There is a well-known injective map which identifies any CA-invariant subshift with a central formal language. However, in the special case of a symbolic dynamics, i.e. where the CA is just the shift map, one gets a stronger result: the identification map can be extended to a functor between the categories of symbolic dynamics and formal languages. This functor additionally maps topological conjugacies between subshifts to empty-string-limited generalized sequential machines between languages. If the periodic points form a dense set, a case which arises in a commonly used notion of chaotic dynamics, then an even more natural map to assign a formal language to a subshift is offered. This map extends to a functor, too. The Chomsky hierarchy measuring the complexity of formal languages can be transferred via either of these functors from formal languages to symbolic dynamics and proves to be a conjugacy invariant there. In this way it acquires a dynamical meaning. After reviewing some results of the complexity of CA-invariant subshifts, special attention is given to a new kind of invariant subshift: the trapped set, which originates from the theory of chaotic scattering and for which one can study complexity transitions.Comment: 23 pages, LaTe

Cinnamons: A Computation Model Underlying Control Network Programming

We give the easily recognizable name "cinnamon" and "cinnamon programming" to a new computation model intended to form a theoretical foundation for Control Network Programming (CNP). CNP has established itself as a programming paradigm combining declarative and imperative features, built-in search engine, powerful tools for search control that allow easy, intuitive, visual development of heuristic, nondeterministic, and randomized solutions. We define rigorously the syntax and semantics of the new model of computation, at the same time trying to keep clear the intuition behind and to include enough examples. The purposely simplified theoretical model is then compared to both WHILE-programs (thus demonstrating its Turing-completeness), and the "real" CNP. Finally, future research possibilities are mentioned that would eventually extend the cinnamon programming into the directions of nondeterminism, randomness, and fuzziness.Comment: 7th Intl Conf. on Computer Science, Engineering & Applications (ICCSEA 2017) September 23~24, 2017, Copenhagen, Denmar