495 research outputs found
On the Complexity of Finding Second-Best Abductive Explanations
While looking for abductive explanations of a given set of manifestations, an
ordering between possible solutions is often assumed. The complexity of
finding/verifying optimal solutions is already known. In this paper we consider
the computational complexity of finding second-best solutions. We consider
different orderings, and consider also different possible definitions of what a
second-best solution is
Query-Answer Causality in Databases: Abductive Diagnosis and View-Updates
Causality has been recently introduced in databases, to model, characterize
and possibly compute causes for query results (answers). Connections between
query causality and consistency-based diagnosis and database repairs (wrt.
integrity constrain violations) have been established in the literature. In
this work we establish connections between query causality and abductive
diagnosis and the view-update problem. The unveiled relationships allow us to
obtain new complexity results for query causality -the main focus of our work-
and also for the two other areas.Comment: To appear in Proc. UAI Causal Inference Workshop, 2015. One example
was fixe
Recommended from our members
A comparative survey of integrated learning systems
This paper presents the duction framework for unifying the three basic forms of inference - deduction, abduction, and induction - by specifying the possible relationships and influences among them in the context of integrated learning. Special assumptive forms of inference are defined that extend the use of these inference methods, and the properties of these forms are explored. A comparison to a related inference-based learning frame work is made. Finally several existing integrated learning programs are examined in the perspective of the duction framework
Backdoors to Normality for Disjunctive Logic Programs
Over the last two decades, propositional satisfiability (SAT) has become one
of the most successful and widely applied techniques for the solution of
NP-complete problems. The aim of this paper is to investigate theoretically how
Sat can be utilized for the efficient solution of problems that are harder than
NP or co-NP. In particular, we consider the fundamental reasoning problems in
propositional disjunctive answer set programming (ASP), Brave Reasoning and
Skeptical Reasoning, which ask whether a given atom is contained in at least
one or in all answer sets, respectively. Both problems are located at the
second level of the Polynomial Hierarchy and thus assumed to be harder than NP
or co-NP. One cannot transform these two reasoning problems into SAT in
polynomial time, unless the Polynomial Hierarchy collapses. We show that
certain structural aspects of disjunctive logic programs can be utilized to
break through this complexity barrier, using new techniques from Parameterized
Complexity. In particular, we exhibit transformations from Brave and Skeptical
Reasoning to SAT that run in time O(2^k n^2) where k is a structural parameter
of the instance and n the input size. In other words, the reduction is
fixed-parameter tractable for parameter k. As the parameter k we take the size
of a smallest backdoor with respect to the class of normal (i.e.,
disjunction-free) programs. Such a backdoor is a set of atoms that when deleted
makes the program normal. In consequence, the combinatorial explosion, which is
expected when transforming a problem from the second level of the Polynomial
Hierarchy to the first level, can now be confined to the parameter k, while the
running time of the reduction is polynomial in the input size n, where the
order of the polynomial is independent of k.Comment: A short version will appear in the Proceedings of the Proceedings of
the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'13). A preliminary
version of the paper was presented on the workshop Answer Set Programming and
Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP 2012), 5th International Workshop,
September 4, 2012, Budapest, Hungar
Some thoughts on theoretical physics
Some thoughts are presented on the inter-relation between beauty and truth in
science in general and theoretical physics in particular. Some conjectural
procedures that can be used to create new ideas, concepts and results are
illustrated in both Boltzmann-Gibbs and nonextensive statistical mechanics. The
sociological components of scientific progress and its unavoidable and benefic
controversies are, mainly through existing literary texts, briefly addressed as
well.Comment: Short essay based on the plenary talk given at the International
Workshop on Trends and Perspectives in Extensive and Non-Extensive
Statistical Mechanics, held in November 19-21, 2003, in Angra dos Reis,
Brazil. To appear in a Physica A special volume (2004) edited by E.M.F.
Curado, H.J. Herrmann and M. Barbosa. 23 pages, including 3 figures. The new
version has 25 pages and the same figures. The texts by Saramago and by
Bersanelli are now translated into English. A few typos and minor
improvements are included as wel
Abduction in Well-Founded Semantics and Generalized Stable Models
Abductive logic programming offers a formalism to declaratively express and
solve problems in areas such as diagnosis, planning, belief revision and
hypothetical reasoning. Tabled logic programming offers a computational
mechanism that provides a level of declarativity superior to that of Prolog,
and which has supported successful applications in fields such as parsing,
program analysis, and model checking. In this paper we show how to use tabled
logic programming to evaluate queries to abductive frameworks with integrity
constraints when these frameworks contain both default and explicit negation.
The result is the ability to compute abduction over well-founded semantics with
explicit negation and answer sets. Our approach consists of a transformation
and an evaluation method. The transformation adjoins to each objective literal
in a program, an objective literal along with rules that ensure
that will be true if and only if is false. We call the resulting
program a {\em dual} program. The evaluation method, \wfsmeth, then operates on
the dual program. \wfsmeth{} is sound and complete for evaluating queries to
abductive frameworks whose entailment method is based on either the
well-founded semantics with explicit negation, or on answer sets. Further,
\wfsmeth{} is asymptotically as efficient as any known method for either class
of problems. In addition, when abduction is not desired, \wfsmeth{} operating
on a dual program provides a novel tabling method for evaluating queries to
ground extended programs whose complexity and termination properties are
similar to those of the best tabling methods for the well-founded semantics. A
publicly available meta-interpreter has been developed for \wfsmeth{} using the
XSB system.Comment: 48 pages; To appear in Theory and Practice in Logic Programmin
Secondary predication in Russian
The paper makes two contributions to semantic typology of secondary predicates. It provides an explanation of the fact that Russian has no resultative secondary predicates, relating this explanation to the interpretation of secondary predicates in English. And it relates depictive secondary predicates in Russian, which usually occur in the instrumental case, to other uses of the instrumental case in Russian, establishing here, too, a difference to English concerning the scope of the secondary predication phenomenon
On abduction and answer generation through constrained resolution
Recently, extensions of constrained logic programming and constrained resolution for theorem proving have been introduced, that consider constraints, which are interpreted under an open world assumption. We discuss relationships between applications of these approaches for query answering in knowledge base systems on the one hand and abduction-based hypothetical reasoning on the other hand. We show both that constrained resolution can be used as an operationalization of (some limited form of) abduction and that abduction is the logical status of an answer generation process through constrained resolution, ie., it is an abductive but not a deductive form of reasoning
Complexity Classifications for logic-based Argumentation
We consider logic-based argumentation in which an argument is a pair (Fi,al),
where the support Fi is a minimal consistent set of formulae taken from a given
knowledge base (usually denoted by De) that entails the claim al (a formula).
We study the complexity of three central problems in argumentation: the
existence of a support Fi ss De, the validity of a support and the relevance
problem (given psi is there a support Fi such that psi ss Fi?). When arguments
are given in the full language of propositional logic these problems are
computationally costly tasks, the validity problem is DP-complete, the others
are SigP2-complete. We study these problems in Schaefer's famous framework
where the considered propositional formulae are in generalized conjunctive
normal form. This means that formulae are conjunctions of constraints build
upon a fixed finite set of Boolean relations Ga (the constraint language). We
show that according to the properties of this language Ga, deciding whether
there exists a support for a claim in a given knowledge base is either
polynomial, NP-complete, coNP-complete or SigP2-complete. We present a
dichotomous classification, P or DP-complete, for the verification problem and
a trichotomous classification for the relevance problem into either polynomial,
NP-complete, or SigP2-complete. These last two classifications are obtained by
means of algebraic tools
- ā¦