13,246 research outputs found

    The Inflation Technique for Causal Inference with Latent Variables

    Full text link
    The problem of causal inference is to determine if a given probability distribution on observed variables is compatible with some causal structure. The difficult case is when the causal structure includes latent variables. We here introduce the inflation technique\textit{inflation technique} for tackling this problem. An inflation of a causal structure is a new causal structure that can contain multiple copies of each of the original variables, but where the ancestry of each copy mirrors that of the original. To every distribution of the observed variables that is compatible with the original causal structure, we assign a family of marginal distributions on certain subsets of the copies that are compatible with the inflated causal structure. It follows that compatibility constraints for the inflation can be translated into compatibility constraints for the original causal structure. Even if the constraints at the level of inflation are weak, such as observable statistical independences implied by disjoint causal ancestry, the translated constraints can be strong. We apply this method to derive new inequalities whose violation by a distribution witnesses that distribution's incompatibility with the causal structure (of which Bell inequalities and Pearl's instrumental inequality are prominent examples). We describe an algorithm for deriving all such inequalities for the original causal structure that follow from ancestral independences in the inflation. For three observed binary variables with pairwise common causes, it yields inequalities that are stronger in at least some aspects than those obtainable by existing methods. We also describe an algorithm that derives a weaker set of inequalities but is more efficient. Finally, we discuss which inflations are such that the inequalities one obtains from them remain valid even for quantum (and post-quantum) generalizations of the notion of a causal model.Comment: Minor final corrections, updated to match the published version as closely as possibl

    On first-order expressibility of satisfiability in submodels

    Full text link
    Let κ,λ\kappa,\lambda be regular cardinals, λ≤κ\lambda\le\kappa, let φ\varphi be a sentence of the language Lκ,λ\mathcal L_{\kappa,\lambda} in a given signature, and let ϑ(φ)\vartheta(\varphi) express the fact that φ\varphi holds in a submodel, i.e., any model A\mathfrak A in the signature satisfies ϑ(φ)\vartheta(\varphi) if and only if some submodel B\mathfrak B of A\mathfrak A satisfies φ\varphi. It was shown in [1] that, whenever φ\varphi is in Lκ,ω\mathcal L_{\kappa,\omega} in the signature having less than κ\kappa functional symbols (and arbitrarily many predicate symbols), then ϑ(φ)\vartheta(\varphi) is equivalent to a monadic existential sentence in the second-order language Lκ,ω2\mathcal L^{2}_{\kappa,\omega}, and that for any signature having at least one binary predicate symbol there exists φ\varphi in Lω,ω\mathcal L_{\omega,\omega} such that ϑ(φ)\vartheta(\varphi) is not equivalent to any (first-order) sentence in L∞,ω\mathcal L_{\infty,\omega}. Nevertheless, in certain cases ϑ(φ)\vartheta(\varphi) are first-order expressible. In this note, we provide several (syntactical and semantical) characterizations of the case when ϑ(φ)\vartheta(\varphi) is in Lκ,κ\mathcal L_{\kappa,\kappa} and κ\kappa is ω\omega or a certain large cardinal

    Invariants of the dihedral group D2pD_{2p} in characteristic two

    Get PDF
    We consider finite dimensional representations of the dihedral group D2pD_{2p} over an algebraically closed field of characteristic two where pp is an odd integer and study the degrees of generating and separating polynomials in the corresponding ring of invariants. We give an upper bound for the degrees of the polynomials in a minimal generating set that does not depend on pp when the dimension of the representation is sufficiently large. We also show that p+1p+1 is the minimal number such that the invariants up to that degree always form a separating set. As well, we give an explicit description of a separating set when pp is prime.Comment: 7 page
    • …
    corecore