1,722 research outputs found
Improved Parameterized Algorithms for Constraint Satisfaction
For many constraint satisfaction problems, the algorithm which chooses a
random assignment achieves the best possible approximation ratio. For instance,
a simple random assignment for {\sc Max-E3-Sat} allows 7/8-approximation and
for every \eps >0 there is no polynomial-time (7/8+\eps)-approximation
unless P=NP. Another example is the {\sc Permutation CSP} of bounded arity.
Given the expected fraction of the constraints satisfied by a random
assignment (i.e. permutation), there is no (\rho+\eps)-approximation
algorithm for every \eps >0, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC).
In this work, we consider the following parameterization of constraint
satisfaction problems. Given a set of constraints of constant arity, can we
satisfy at least constraint, where is the expected fraction
of constraints satisfied by a random assignment? {\sc Constraint Satisfaction
Problems above Average} have been posed in different forms in the literature
\cite{Niedermeier2006,MahajanRamanSikdar09}. We present a faster parameterized
algorithm for deciding whether equations can be simultaneously
satisfied over . As a consequence, we obtain -variable
bikernels for {\sc boolean CSPs} of arity for every fixed , and for {\sc
permutation CSPs} of arity 3. This implies linear bikernels for many problems
under the "above average" parameterization, such as {\sc Max--Sat}, {\sc
Set-Splitting}, {\sc Betweenness} and {\sc Max Acyclic Subgraph}. As a result,
all the parameterized problems we consider in this paper admit -time
algorithms.
We also obtain non-trivial hybrid algorithms for every Max -CSP: for every
instance , we can either approximate beyond the random assignment
threshold in polynomial time, or we can find an optimal solution to in
subexponential time.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper has been accepted for IPEC 201
Approximation Complexity of Complex-Weighted Degree-Two Counting Constraint Satisfaction Problems
Constraint satisfaction problems have been studied in numerous fields with
practical and theoretical interests. In recent years, major breakthroughs have
been made in a study of counting constraint satisfaction problems (or #CSPs).
In particular, a computational complexity classification of bounded-degree
#CSPs has been discovered for all degrees except for two, where the "degree" of
an input instance is the maximal number of times that each input variable
appears in a given set of constraints. Despite the efforts of recent studies,
however, a complexity classification of degree-2 #CSPs has eluded from our
understandings. This paper challenges this open problem and gives its partial
solution by applying two novel proof techniques--T_{2}-constructibility and
parametrized symmetrization--which are specifically designed to handle
"arbitrary" constraints under randomized approximation-preserving reductions.
We partition entire constraints into four sets and we classify the
approximation complexity of all degree-2 #CSPs whose constraints are drawn from
two of the four sets into two categories: problems computable in
polynomial-time or problems that are at least as hard as #SAT. Our proof
exploits a close relationship between complex-weighted degree-2 #CSPs and
Holant problems, which are a natural generalization of complex-weighted #CSPs.Comment: A4, 10pt, 23 pages. This is a complete version of the paper that
appeared in the Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Computing and
Combinatorics Conference (COCOON 2011), Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
vol.6842, pp.122-133, Dallas, Texas, USA, August 14-16, 201
Hardness of robust graph isomorphism, Lasserre gaps, and asymmetry of random graphs
Building on work of Cai, F\"urer, and Immerman \cite{CFI92}, we show two
hardness results for the Graph Isomorphism problem. First, we show that there
are pairs of nonisomorphic -vertex graphs and such that any
sum-of-squares (SOS) proof of nonisomorphism requires degree . In
other words, we show an -round integrality gap for the Lasserre SDP
relaxation. In fact, we show this for pairs and which are not even
-isomorphic. (Here we say that two -vertex, -edge graphs
and are -isomorphic if there is a bijection between their
vertices which preserves at least edges.) Our second result is that
under the {\sc R3XOR} Hypothesis \cite{Fei02} (and also any of a class of
hypotheses which generalize the {\sc R3XOR} Hypothesis), the \emph{robust}
Graph Isomorphism problem is hard. I.e.\ for every , there is no
efficient algorithm which can distinguish graph pairs which are
-isomorphic from pairs which are not even
-isomorphic for some universal constant . Along the
way we prove a robust asymmetry result for random graphs and hypergraphs which
may be of independent interest
- …