On dominating and spanning circuits in graphs

An eulerian subgraph of a graph is called a circuit. As shown by Harary and Nash-Williams, the existence of a Hamilton cycle in the line graph L(G) of a graph G is equivalent to the existence of a dominating circuit in G, i.e., a circuit such that every edge of G is incident with a vertex of the circuit. Important progress in the study of the existence of spanning and dominating circuits was made by Catlin, who defined the reduction of a graph G and showed that G has a spanning circuit if and only if the reduction of G has a spanning circuit. We refine Catlin's reduction technique to obtain a result which contains several known and new sufficient conditions for a graph to have a spanning or dominating circuit in terms of degree-sums of adjacent vertices. In particular, the result implies the truth of the following conjecture of Benhocine et al.: If G is a connected simple graph of order n such that every cut edge of G is incident with a vertex of degree 1 and d(u)+d(v) > 2(1/5n-1) for every edge uv of G, then, for n sufficiently large, L(G) is hamiltonian

On some intriguing problems in Hamiltonian graph theory -- A survey

We survey results and open problems in Hamiltonian graph theory centred around three themes: regular graphs, $t$-tough graphs, and claw-free graphs

Existence of spanning and dominating trails and circuits

Let T be a trail of a graph G. T is a spanning trail (S-trail) if T contains all vertices of G. T is a dominating trail (D-trail) if every edge of G is incident with at least one vertex of T. A circuit is a nontrivial closed trail. Sufficient conditions involving lower bounds on the degree-sum of vertices or edges are derived for graphs to have an S-trail, S-circuit, D-trail, or D-circuit. Thereby a result of Brualdi and Shanny and one mentioned by Lesniak-Foster and Williamson are improved

A result on Hamiltonian line graphs involving restrictions on induced subgraphs

It is shown that the existence of a Hamilton cycle in the line graph of a graph G can be ensured by imposing certain restrictions on certain induced subgraphs of G. Thereby a number of known results on hamiltonian line graphs are improved, including the earliest results in terms of vertex degrees. One particular consequence is that every graph of diameter 2 and order at least 4 has a hamiltonian line graph

On factors of 4-connected claw-free graphs

We consider the existence of several different kinds of factors in 4-connected claw-free graphs. This is motivated by the following two conjectures which are in fact equivalent by a recent result of the third author. Conjecture 1 (Thomassen): Every 4-connected line graph is Hamiltonian, i.e. has a connected 2-factor. Conjecture 2 (Matthews and Sumner): Every 4-connected claw-free graph is hamiltonian. We first show that Conjecture 2 is true within the class of hourglass-free graphs, i.e. graphs that do not contain an induced subgraph isomorphic to two triangles meeting in exactly one vertex. Next we show that a weaker form of Conjecture 2 is true, in which the conclusion is replaced by the conclusion that there exists a connected spanning subgraph in which each vertex has degree two or four. Finally we show that Conjecture 1 and 2 are equivalent to seemingly weaker conjectures in which the conclusion is replaced by the conclusion that there exists a spanning subgraph consisting of a bounded number of paths. \u