2,154 research outputs found
Locality and measurements within the SR model for an objective interpretation of quantum mechanics
One of the authors has recently propounded an SR (semantic realism) model
which shows, circumventing known no-go theorems, that an objective
(noncontextual, hence local) interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) is
possible. We consider here compound physical systems and show why the proofs of
nonlocality of QM do not hold within the SR model. We also discuss quantum
measurement theory within this model, note that the objectification problem
disappears since the measurement of any property simply reveals its unknown
value, and show that the projection postulate can be considered as an
approximate law, valid FAPP (for all practical purposes). Finally, we provide
an intuitive justification for some unusual features of the SR model.Comment: 29 pages, minor correction
Implementation of classical communication in a quantum world
Observations of quantum systems carried out by finite observers who
subsequently communicate their results using classical data structures can be
described as "local operations, classical communication" (LOCC) observations.
The implementation of LOCC observations by the Hamiltonian dynamics prescribed
by minimal quantum mechanics is investigated. It is shown that LOCC
observations cannot be described using decoherence considerations alone, but
rather require the \textit{a priori} stipulation of a positive operator-valued
measure (POVM) about which communicating observers agree. It is also shown that
the transfer of classical information from system to observer can be described
in terms of system-observer entanglement, raising the possibility that an
apparatus implementing an appropriate POVM can reveal the entangled
system-observer states that implement LOCC observations.Comment: 17 pages, 2 figures; final versio
Quantum Machine and SR Approach: a Unified Model
The Geneva-Brussels approach to quantum mechanics (QM) and the semantic
realism (SR) nonstandard interpretation of QM exhibit some common features and
some deep conceptual differences. We discuss in this paper two elementary
models provided in the two approaches as intuitive supports to general
reasonings and as a proof of consistency of general assumptions, and show that
Aerts' quantum machine can be embodied into a macroscopic version of the
microscopic SR model, overcoming the seeming incompatibility between the two
models. This result provides some hints for the construction of a unified
perspective in which the two approaches can be properly placed.Comment: 21 pages, 5 figures. Introduction and Conclusions improved, minor
corrections in several sections. Accepted for publication in Foundations of
Physic
Contexts, Systems and Modalities: a new ontology for quantum mechanics
In this article we present a possible way to make usual quantum mechanics
fully compatible with physical realism, defined as the statement that the goal
of physics is to study entities of the natural world, existing independently
from any particular observer's perception, and obeying universal and
intelligible rules. Rather than elaborating on the quantum formalism itself, we
propose to modify the quantum ontology, by requiring that physical properties
are attributed jointly to the system, and to the context in which it is
embedded. In combination with a quantization principle, this non-classical
definition of physical reality sheds new light on counter-intuitive features of
quantum mechanics such as the origin of probabilities, non-locality, and the
quantum-classical boundary.Comment: 9 pages, 3 figures. In v2 extended section VI on EPR, and new section
VII on measurement
A Semantic Approach to the Completeness Problem in Quantum Mechanics
The old Bohr-Einstein debate about the completeness of quantum mechanics (QM)
was held on an ontological ground. The completeness problem becomes more
tractable, however, if it is preliminarily discussed from a semantic viewpoint.
Indeed every physical theory adopts, explicitly or not, a truth theory for its
observative language, in terms of which the notions of semantic objectivity and
semantic completeness of the physical theory can be introduced and inquired. In
particular, standard QM adopts a verificationist theory of truth that implies
its semantic nonobjectivity; moreover, we show in this paper that standard QM
is semantically complete, which matches Bohr's thesis. On the other hand, one
of the authors has provided a Semantic Realism (or SR) interpretation of QM
that adopts a Tarskian theory of truth as correspondence for the observative
language of QM (which was previously mantained to be impossible); according to
this interpretation QM is semantically objective, yet incomplete, which matches
EPR's thesis. Thus, standard QM and the SR interpretation of QM come to
opposite conclusions. These can be reconciled within an integrationist
perspective that interpretes non-Tarskian theories of truth as theories of
metalinguistic concepts different from truth.Comment: 19 pages. Further revision. Proof of Theorem 3.2.1 simplified,
Section 3.5 amended, minor changes in several sections. Accepted for
publication in Foundations of Physic
- …