1,649 research outputs found

    Drawings of Planar Graphs with Few Slopes and Segments

    Get PDF
    We study straight-line drawings of planar graphs with few segments and few slopes. Optimal results are obtained for all trees. Tight bounds are obtained for outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. We prove that every 3-connected plane graph on nn vertices has a plane drawing with at most 5/2n{5/2}n segments and at most 2n2n slopes. We prove that every cubic 3-connected plane graph has a plane drawing with three slopes (and three bends on the outerface). In a companion paper, drawings of non-planar graphs with few slopes are also considered.Comment: This paper is submitted to a journal. A preliminary version appeared as "Really Straight Graph Drawings" in the Graph Drawing 2004 conference. See http://arxiv.org/math/0606446 for a companion pape

    On Visibility and Blockers

    Full text link
    This expository paper discusses some conjectures related to visibility and blockers for sets of points in the plane

    Aligned Drawings of Planar Graphs

    Get PDF
    Let GG be a graph that is topologically embedded in the plane and let A\mathcal{A} be an arrangement of pseudolines intersecting the drawing of GG. An aligned drawing of GG and A\mathcal{A} is a planar polyline drawing Γ\Gamma of GG with an arrangement AA of lines so that Γ\Gamma and AA are homeomorphic to GG and A\mathcal{A}. We show that if A\mathcal{A} is stretchable and every edge ee either entirely lies on a pseudoline or it has at most one intersection with A\mathcal{A}, then GG and A\mathcal{A} have a straight-line aligned drawing. In order to prove this result, we strengthen a result of Da Lozzo et al., and prove that a planar graph GG and a single pseudoline L\mathcal{L} have an aligned drawing with a prescribed convex drawing of the outer face. We also study the less restrictive version of the alignment problem with respect to one line, where only a set of vertices is given and we need to determine whether they can be collinear. We show that the problem is NP-complete but fixed-parameter tractable.Comment: Preliminary work appeared in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017

    Graph Treewidth and Geometric Thickness Parameters

    Full text link
    Consider a drawing of a graph GG in the plane such that crossing edges are coloured differently. The minimum number of colours, taken over all drawings of GG, is the classical graph parameter "thickness". By restricting the edges to be straight, we obtain the "geometric thickness". By further restricting the vertices to be in convex position, we obtain the "book thickness". This paper studies the relationship between these parameters and treewidth. Our first main result states that for graphs of treewidth kk, the maximum thickness and the maximum geometric thickness both equal k/2\lceil{k/2}\rceil. This says that the lower bound for thickness can be matched by an upper bound, even in the more restrictive geometric setting. Our second main result states that for graphs of treewidth kk, the maximum book thickness equals kk if k2k \leq 2 and equals k+1k+1 if k3k \geq 3. This refutes a conjecture of Ganley and Heath [Discrete Appl. Math. 109(3):215-221, 2001]. Analogous results are proved for outerthickness, arboricity, and star-arboricity.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the "Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Graph Drawing" (GD '05), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3843:129-140, Springer, 2006. The full version was published in Discrete & Computational Geometry 37(4):641-670, 2007. That version contained a false conjecture, which is corrected on page 26 of this versio

    The Complexity of Drawing Graphs on Few Lines and Few Planes

    Full text link
    It is well known that any graph admits a crossing-free straight-line drawing in R3\mathbb{R}^3 and that any planar graph admits the same even in R2\mathbb{R}^2. For a graph GG and d{2,3}d \in \{2,3\}, let ρd1(G)\rho^1_d(G) denote the minimum number of lines in Rd\mathbb{R}^d that together can cover all edges of a drawing of GG. For d=2d=2, GG must be planar. We investigate the complexity of computing these parameters and obtain the following hardness and algorithmic results. - For d{2,3}d\in\{2,3\}, we prove that deciding whether ρd1(G)k\rho^1_d(G)\le k for a given graph GG and integer kk is R{\exists\mathbb{R}}-complete. - Since NPR\mathrm{NP}\subseteq{\exists\mathbb{R}}, deciding ρd1(G)k\rho^1_d(G)\le k is NP-hard for d{2,3}d\in\{2,3\}. On the positive side, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to kk. - Since RPSPACE{\exists\mathbb{R}}\subseteq\mathrm{PSPACE}, both ρ21(G)\rho^1_2(G) and ρ31(G)\rho^1_3(G) are computable in polynomial space. On the negative side, we show that drawings that are optimal with respect to ρ21\rho^1_2 or ρ31\rho^1_3 sometimes require irrational coordinates. - Let ρ32(G)\rho^2_3(G) be the minimum number of planes in R3\mathbb{R}^3 needed to cover a straight-line drawing of a graph GG. We prove that deciding whether ρ32(G)k\rho^2_3(G)\le k is NP-hard for any fixed k2k \ge 2. Hence, the problem is not fixed-parameter tractable with respect to kk unless P=NP\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}

    Variable sweep aircraft wing Patent

    Get PDF
    Supersonic aircraft variable sweep wing planform for varying aspect rati
    corecore