Mobility-Aware, Correlation-Based Node Grouping and Selection for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing, Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 2014, nr 2

Cooperative spectrum sensing has been proposed as a solution to increase the sensing function accuracy in cognitive radio networks, but the research has, so far, mainly focused on static scenarios, all but neglecting the impact of mobility on spectrum sensing. In this work a novel cooperative spectrum sensing scheme for mobile cognitive networks, based on a correlation-based, mobility-aware node selection algorithm is proposed. Correlation among sensing decisions is used to divide nodes into groups, and mobility is taken into account in the group leaders selection by means of a node selection metric that considers both sensing performance and mobility. Performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated by computer simulations taking into account mobility and a detailed modeling of temporal and spatial correlation of fading and shadowing components in the channel path loss, going way beyond the performance evaluation carried out in previous works on correlation-based cooperative sensing schemes. Simulation results highlight that the proposed metric leads to a signi cant increase of the update period required to maintain acceptable sensing performance, and correspondingly to a strong reduction in the overhead caused by the grouping and node selection procedure

A Channel Ranking And Selection Scheme Based On Channel Occupancy And SNR For Cognitive Radio Systems

Wireless networks and information traffic have grown exponentially over the last decade. Consequently, an increase in demand for radio spectrum frequency bandwidth has resulted. Recent studies have shown that with the current fixed spectrum allocation (FSA), radio frequency band utilization ranges from 15% to 85%. Therefore, there are spectrum holes that are not utilized all the time by the licensed users, and, thus the radio spectrum is inefficiently exploited. To solve the problem of scarcity and inefficient utilization of the spectrum resources, dynamic spectrum access has been proposed as a solution to enable sharing and using available frequency channels. With dynamic spectrum allocation (DSA), unlicensed users can access and use licensed, available channels when primary users are not transmitting. Cognitive Radio technology is one of the next generation technologies that will allow efficient utilization of spectrum resources by enabling DSA. However, dynamic spectrum allocation by a cognitive radio system comes with the challenges of accurately detecting and selecting the best channel based on the channelâs availability and quality of service. Therefore, the spectrum sensing and analysis processes of a cognitive radio system are essential to make accurate decisions. Different spectrum sensing techniques and channel selection schemes have been proposed. However, these techniques only consider the spectrum occupancy rate for selecting the best channel, which can lead to erroneous decisions. Other communication parameters, such as the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) should also be taken into account. Therefore, the spectrum decision-making process of a cognitive radio system must use techniques that consider spectrum occupancy and channel quality metrics to rank channels and select the best option. This thesis aims to develop a utility function based on spectrum occupancy and SNR measurements to model and rank the sensed channels. An evolutionary algorithm-based SNR estimation technique was developed, which enables adaptively varying key parameters of the existing Eigenvalue-based blind SNR estimation technique. The performance of the improved technique is compared to the existing technique. Results show the evolutionary algorithm-based estimation performing better than the existing technique. The utility-based channel ranking technique was developed by first defining channel utility function that takes into account SNR and spectrum occupancy. Different mathematical functions were investigated to appropriately model the utility of SNR and spectrum occupancy rate. A ranking table is provided with the utility values of the sensed channels and compared with the usual occupancy rate based channel ranking. According to the results, utility-based channel ranking provides a better scope of making an informed decision by considering both channel occupancy rate and SNR. In addition, the efficiency of several noise cancellation techniques was investigated. These techniques can be employed to get rid of the impact of noise on the received or sensed signals during spectrum sensing process of a cognitive radio system. Performance evaluation of these techniques was done using simulations and the results show that the evolutionary algorithm-based noise cancellation techniques, particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm perform better than the regular gradient descent based technique, which is the least-mean-square algorithm

Joint Optimization of Detection Threshold and Resource Allocation in Infrastructure-based Multi-band Cognitive Radio Networks

[EN] Consider an infrastructure-based multi-band cognitive radio network (CRN) where secondary users (SUs) opportunistically access a set of sub-carriers when sensed as idle. The carrier sensing threshold which affects the access opportunities of SUs is conventionally regarded as static and treated independently from the resource allocation in the model. In this article, we study jointly the optimization of detection threshold and resource allocation with the goal of maximizing the total downlink capacity of SUs in such CRNs. The optimization problem is formulated considering three sets of variables, i.e., detection threshold, sub-carrier assignment and power allocation, with constraints on the PUs¿ rate loss and the power budget of the CR base station. Two schemes, referred to as offline and online algorithms respectively, are proposed to solve the optimization problem. While the offline algorithm finds the global optimal solution with high complexity, the online algorithm provides a close-to-optimal solution with much lower complexity and realtime capability. The performance of the proposed schemes is evaluated by extensive simulations and compared with the conventional static threshold selection algorithm specified in the IEEE 802.22 standard.This work is supported by the EU FP7 S2EuNet project (247083), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSF61121001), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET) and the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science under project (TIN2008-06739-C04-02).Shi, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, P.; Martínez Bauset, J.; Li, FY. (2012). Joint Optimization of Detection Threshold and Resource Allocation in Infrastructure-based Multi-band Cognitive Radio Networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. 2012(334):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2012-334S1162012334Wang B, Liu K: Advances in cognitive radio networks: a survey. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process 2011, 5: 5-23.Akyildiz I, Lee W, Vuran M, Mohanty S: Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 2006, 50(13):2127-2159. 10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001Haykin S: Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun 2005, 23(2):201-220.Zhao Q, Sadler B: A survey of dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Signal Process. Mag 2007, 24(3):79-89.Nguyen M, Lee H: Effective scheduling in infrastructure-based cognitive radio network. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput 2011, 10(6):853-867.Almalfouh S, Stuber G: Interference-aware radio resource allocation in OFDMA-based cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 2011, 60(4):1699-1713.Kang X, Liang Y, Nallanathan A, Garg H, Zhang R: Optimal power allocation for fading channels in cognitive radio networks: ergodic capacity and outage capacity. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2009, 8(2):940-950.Bansal G, Hossain M, Bhargava V: Optimal and suboptimal power allocation schemes for OFDM-based cognitive radio systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2008, 7(11):4710-4718.Yucek T, Arslan H: A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor 2009, 11: 116-130.Cordeiro C, Ghosh M, Cavalcanti D, Challapali K: Spectrum sensing for dynamic spectrum access of TV bands. In Proceedings of the 2nd Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom’07). (Orlando, FL, USA, 1–3 Aug 2007);Chong J, Sung D, Sung Y: Cross-layer performance analysis for CSMA/CA protocols: impact of imperfect sensing. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 2010, 59(3):1100-1108.Seol D, Lim H, Im G: Cooperative spectrum sensing with dynamic threshold adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM’09). Honolulu, HI, USA; 1.Liang Y, Zeng Y, Peh E, Hoang A: Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2008, 7(4):1326-1337.Kang X, Liang Y, Garg H, Zhang L: Sensing-based spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 2009, 58(8):4649-4654.Choi H, Jang K, Cheong Y: Adaptive sensing threshold control based on transmission power in cognitive radio systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom’08). (Singapore, 15–17 May 2008), pp.1–6Gorcin A, Qaraqe K, Celebi H, Arslan H: An adaptive threshold method for spectrum sensing in multi-channel cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT’10). Doha, Qatar; 4.Foukalas F, Mathiopoulos P, Karetsos G: Joint optimal power allocation and sensing threshold selection for SU’s capacity maximisation in SS CRN. Electron. Lett 2010, 46(20):1406-1407. 10.1049/el.2010.1355Jia P, Vu M, Le-Ngoc T, Hong S, Tarokh V: Capacity-and bayesian-based cognitive sensing with location side information. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun 2011, 29(2):276-289.Wang R, Lau V, Lv L, Chen B: Joint cross-layer scheduling and spectrum sensing for OFDMA cognitive radio systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2009, 8(5):2410-2416.Kang X, Garg H, Liang Y, Zhang R: Optimal power allocation for OFDM-based cognitive radio with new primary transmission protection criteria. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun 2010, 9(6):2066-2075.Quan Z, Cui S, Sayed A, Poor H: Optimal multiband joint detection for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process 2009, 57(3):1128-1140.López-Benítez M, Casadevall F: An overview of spectrum occupancy models for cognitive radio networks. In International IFIP TC 6 Workshops: PE-CRN, NC-Pro, WCNS , and SUNSET. Valencia, Spain; 13 May 2011.Pla V, Vidal J, Martinez-Bause J, Guijarro L: Modeling and characterization of spectrum white spaces for underlay cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’10). Cape Town, South Africa; 23.Yu W, Lui R: Dual methods for nonconvex spectrum optimization of multicarrier systems. IEEE Trans. Commun 2006, 54(7):1310-1322.Boyd S, Vandenberghe L: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2004.Jang J, Lee K: Transmit power adaptation for multiuser OFDM systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun 2003, 21(2):171-178. 10.1109/JSAC.2002.807348Luenberger D, Ye Y: Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Springer Verlag, Stanford; 2008.Barbarossa S, Sardellitti S, Scutari G: Joint optimization of detection thresholds and power allocation for opportunistic access in multicarrier cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP’09). Aruba, Netherlands; 13