1,815 research outputs found

    All solution graphs in multidimensional screening

    Get PDF
    We study general discrete-types multidimensional screening without any noticeable restrictions on valuations, using instead epsilon-relaxation of the incentive-compatibility constraints. Any active (becoming equality) constraint can be perceived as "envy" arc from one type to another, so the set of active constraints is a digraph. We find that: (1) any solution has an in-rooted acyclic graph ("river"); (2) for any logically feasible river there exists a screening problem resulting in such river. Using these results, any solution is characterized both through its spanning-tree and through its Lagrange multipliers, that can help in finding solutions and their efficiency/distortion properties.incentive compatibility; multidimensional screening; second-degree price discrimination; non-linear pricing; graphs

    Strong Integer Additive Set-valued Graphs: A Creative Review

    Full text link
    For a non-empty ground set XX, finite or infinite, the {\em set-valuation} or {\em set-labeling} of a given graph GG is an injective function f:V(G)β†’P(X)f:V(G) \to \mathcal{P}(X), where P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) is the power set of the set XX. A set-indexer of a graph GG is an injective set-valued function f:V(G)β†’P(X)f:V(G) \to \mathcal{P}(X) such that the function fβˆ—:E(G)β†’P(X)βˆ’{βˆ…}f^{\ast}:E(G)\to \mathcal{P}(X)-\{\emptyset\} defined by fβˆ—(uv)=f(u)βˆ—f(v)f^{\ast}(uv) = f(u){\ast} f(v) for every uv∈E(G)uv{\in} E(G) is also injective., where βˆ—\ast is a binary operation on sets. An integer additive set-indexer is defined as an injective function f:V(G)β†’P(N0)f:V(G)\to \mathcal{P}({\mathbb{N}_0}) such that the induced function gf:E(G)β†’P(N0)g_f:E(G) \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}_0) defined by gf(uv)=f(u)+f(v)g_f (uv) = f(u)+ f(v) is also injective, where N0\mathbb{N}_0 is the set of all non-negative integers and P(N0)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}_0) is its power set. An IASI ff is said to be a strong IASI if ∣f+(uv)∣=∣f(u)βˆ£β€‰βˆ£f(v)∣|f^+(uv)|=|f(u)|\,|f(v)| for every pair of adjacent vertices u,vu,v in GG. In this paper, we critically and creatively review the concepts and properties of strong integer additive set-valued graphs.Comment: 13 pages, Published. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1407.4677, arXiv:1405.4788, arXiv:1310.626

    Abstract Tensor Systems as Monoidal Categories

    Full text link
    The primary contribution of this paper is to give a formal, categorical treatment to Penrose's abstract tensor notation, in the context of traced symmetric monoidal categories. To do so, we introduce a typed, sum-free version of an abstract tensor system and demonstrate the construction of its associated category. We then show that the associated category of the free abstract tensor system is in fact the free traced symmetric monoidal category on a monoidal signature. A notable consequence of this result is a simple proof for the soundness and completeness of the diagrammatic language for traced symmetric monoidal categories.Comment: Dedicated to Joachim Lambek on the occasion of his 90th birthda

    Pareto-Optimal Allocation of Indivisible Goods with Connectivity Constraints

    Full text link
    We study the problem of allocating indivisible items to agents with additive valuations, under the additional constraint that bundles must be connected in an underlying item graph. Previous work has considered the existence and complexity of fair allocations. We study the problem of finding an allocation that is Pareto-optimal. While it is easy to find an efficient allocation when the underlying graph is a path or a star, the problem is NP-hard for many other graph topologies, even for trees of bounded pathwidth or of maximum degree 3. We show that on a path, there are instances where no Pareto-optimal allocation satisfies envy-freeness up to one good, and that it is NP-hard to decide whether such an allocation exists, even for binary valuations. We also show that, for a path, it is NP-hard to find a Pareto-optimal allocation that satisfies maximin share, but show that a moving-knife algorithm can find such an allocation when agents have binary valuations that have a non-nested interval structure.Comment: 21 pages, full version of paper at AAAI-201
    • …
    corecore