On a generalization of iterated and randomized rounding

We give a general method for rounding linear programs that combines the commonly used iterated rounding and randomized rounding techniques. In particular, we show that whenever iterated rounding can be applied to a problem with some slack, there is a randomized procedure that returns an integral solution that satisfies the guarantees of iterated rounding and also has concentration properties. We use this to give new results for several classic problems where iterated rounding has been useful

On a generalization of iterated and randomized rounding

We give a general method for rounding linear programs that combines the commonly used iterated rounding and randomized rounding techniques. In particular, we show that whenever iterated rounding can be applied to a problem with some slack, there is a randomized procedure that returns an integral solution that satisfies the guarantees of iterated rounding and also has concentration properties. We use this to give new results for several classic problems such as rounding column-sparse LPs, makespan minimization on unrelated machines, degree-bounded spanning trees and multi-budgeted matchings

On k-Column Sparse Packing Programs

We consider the class of packing integer programs (PIPs) that are column sparse, i.e. there is a specified upper bound k on the number of constraints that each variable appears in. We give an (ek+o(k))-approximation algorithm for k-column sparse PIPs, improving on recent results of $k^2\cdot 2^k$ and $O(k^2)$. We also show that the integrality gap of our linear programming relaxation is at least 2k-1; it is known that k-column sparse PIPs are $\Omega(k/ \log k)$-hard to approximate. We also extend our result (at the loss of a small constant factor) to the more general case of maximizing a submodular objective over k-column sparse packing constraints.Comment: 19 pages, v3: additional detail

Virtual Network Embedding Approximations: Leveraging Randomized Rounding

© 2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.The Virtual Network Embedding Problem (VNEP) captures the essence of many resource allocation problems. In the VNEP, customers request resources in the form of Virtual Networks. An embedding of a virtual network on a shared physical infrastructure is the joint mapping of (virtual) nodes to physical servers together with the mapping of (virtual) edges onto paths in the physical network connecting the respective servers. This work initiates the study of approximation algorithms for the VNEP for general request graphs. Concretely, we study the offline setting with admission control: given multiple requests, the task is to embed the most profitable subset while not exceeding resource capacities. Our approximation is based on the randomized rounding of Linear Programming (LP) solutions. Interestingly, we uncover that the standard LP formulation for the VNEP exhibits an inherent structural deficit when considering general virtual network topologies: its solutions cannot be decomposed into valid embeddings. In turn, focusing on the class of cactus request graphs, we devise a novel LP formulation, whose solutions can be decomposed. Proving performance guarantees of our rounding scheme, we obtain the first approximation algorithm for the VNEP in the resource augmentation model. We propose different types of rounding heuristics and evaluate their performance in an extensive computational study. Our results indicate that good solutions can be achieved even without resource augmentations. Specifically, heuristical rounding achieves 77.2% of the baseline’s profit on average while respecting capacities.BMBF, 01IS12056, Software Campus GrantEC/H2020/679158/EU/Resolving the Tussle in the Internet: Mapping, Architecture, and Policy Making/ResolutioNe

Maximizing coverage while ensuring fairness: a tale of conflicting objective

Ensuring fairness in computational problems has emerged as a $key$ topic during recent years, buoyed by considerations for equitable resource distributions and social justice. It $is$ possible to incorporate fairness in computational problems from several perspectives, such as using optimization, game-theoretic or machine learning frameworks. In this paper we address the problem of incorporation of fairness from a $combinatorial$ $optimization$ perspective. We formulate a combinatorial optimization framework, suitable for analysis by researchers in approximation algorithms and related areas, that incorporates fairness in maximum coverage problems as an interplay between $two$ conflicting objectives. Fairness is imposed in coverage by using coloring constraints that $minimizes$ the discrepancies between number of elements of different colors covered by selected sets; this is in contrast to the usual discrepancy minimization problems studied extensively in the literature where (usually two) colors are $not$ given $a$ $priori$ but need to be selected to minimize the maximum color discrepancy of $each$ individual set. Our main results are a set of randomized and deterministic approximation algorithms that attempts to $simultaneously$ approximate both fairness and coverage in this framework