3,889 research outputs found
Finite Automata for the Sub- and Superword Closure of CFLs: Descriptional and Computational Complexity
We answer two open questions by (Gruber, Holzer, Kutrib, 2009) on the
state-complexity of representing sub- or superword closures of context-free
grammars (CFGs): (1) We prove a (tight) upper bound of on
the size of nondeterministic finite automata (NFAs) representing the subword
closure of a CFG of size . (2) We present a family of CFGs for which the
minimal deterministic finite automata representing their subword closure
matches the upper-bound of following from (1).
Furthermore, we prove that the inequivalence problem for NFAs representing sub-
or superword-closed languages is only NP-complete as opposed to PSPACE-complete
for general NFAs. Finally, we extend our results into an approximation method
to attack inequivalence problems for CFGs
Power of Counting by Nonuniform Families of Polynomial-Size Finite Automata
Lately, there have been intensive studies on strengths and limitations of
nonuniform families of promise decision problems solvable by various types of
polynomial-size finite automata families, where "polynomial-size" refers to the
polynomially-bounded state complexity of a finite automata family. In this line
of study, we further expand the scope of these studies to families of partial
counting and gap functions, defined in terms of nonuniform families of
polynomial-size nondeterministic finite automata, and their relevant families
of promise decision problems. Counting functions have an ability of counting
the number of accepting computation paths produced by nondeterministic finite
automata. With no unproven hardness assumption, we show numerous separations
and collapses of complexity classes of those partial counting and gap function
families and their induced promise decision problem families. We also
investigate their relationships to pushdown automata families of polynomial
stack-state complexity.Comment: (A4, 10pt, 21 pages) This paper corrects and extends a preliminary
report published in the Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on
Fundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT 2023), Trier, Germany, September
18-24, 2023, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 14292, pp. 421-435,
Springer Cham, 202
Multi-Head Finite Automata: Characterizations, Concepts and Open Problems
Multi-head finite automata were introduced in (Rabin, 1964) and (Rosenberg,
1966). Since that time, a vast literature on computational and descriptional
complexity issues on multi-head finite automata documenting the importance of
these devices has been developed. Although multi-head finite automata are a
simple concept, their computational behavior can be already very complex and
leads to undecidable or even non-semi-decidable problems on these devices such
as, for example, emptiness, finiteness, universality, equivalence, etc. These
strong negative results trigger the study of subclasses and alternative
characterizations of multi-head finite automata for a better understanding of
the nature of non-recursive trade-offs and, thus, the borderline between
decidable and undecidable problems. In the present paper, we tour a fragment of
this literature
The Magic Number Problem for Subregular Language Families
We investigate the magic number problem, that is, the question whether there
exists a minimal n-state nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA) whose
equivalent minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA) has alpha states, for
all n and alpha satisfying n less or equal to alpha less or equal to exp(2,n).
A number alpha not satisfying this condition is called a magic number (for n).
It was shown in [11] that no magic numbers exist for general regular languages,
while in [5] trivial and non-trivial magic numbers for unary regular languages
were identified. We obtain similar results for automata accepting subregular
languages like, for example, combinational languages, star-free, prefix-,
suffix-, and infix-closed languages, and prefix-, suffix-, and infix-free
languages, showing that there are only trivial magic numbers, when they exist.
For finite languages we obtain some partial results showing that certain
numbers are non-magic.Comment: In Proceedings DCFS 2010, arXiv:1008.127
Automata with Nested Pebbles Capture First-Order Logic with Transitive Closure
String languages recognizable in (deterministic) log-space are characterized
either by two-way (deterministic) multi-head automata, or following Immerman,
by first-order logic with (deterministic) transitive closure. Here we elaborate
this result, and match the number of heads to the arity of the transitive
closure. More precisely, first-order logic with k-ary deterministic transitive
closure has the same power as deterministic automata walking on their input
with k heads, additionally using a finite set of nested pebbles. This result is
valid for strings, ordered trees, and in general for families of graphs having
a fixed automaton that can be used to traverse the nodes of each of the graphs
in the family. Other examples of such families are grids, toruses, and
rectangular mazes. For nondeterministic automata, the logic is restricted to
positive occurrences of transitive closure.
The special case of k=1 for trees, shows that single-head deterministic
tree-walking automata with nested pebbles are characterized by first-order
logic with unary deterministic transitive closure. This refines our earlier
result that placed these automata between first-order and monadic second-order
logic on trees.Comment: Paper for Logical Methods in Computer Science, 27 pages, 1 figur
- …