269 research outputs found

    On Sparsification for Computing Treewidth

    Full text link
    We investigate whether an n-vertex instance (G,k) of Treewidth, asking whether the graph G has treewidth at most k, can efficiently be made sparse without changing its answer. By giving a special form of OR-cross-composition, we prove that this is unlikely: if there is an e > 0 and a polynomial-time algorithm that reduces n-vertex Treewidth instances to equivalent instances, of an arbitrary problem, with O(n^{2-e}) bits, then NP is in coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level. Our sparsification lower bound has implications for structural parameterizations of Treewidth: parameterizations by measures that do not exceed the vertex count, cannot have kernels with O(k^{2-e}) bits for any e > 0, unless NP is in coNP/poly. Motivated by the question of determining the optimal kernel size for Treewidth parameterized by vertex cover, we improve the O(k^3)-vertex kernel from Bodlaender et al. (STACS 2011) to a kernel with O(k^2) vertices. Our improved kernel is based on a novel form of treewidth-invariant set. We use the q-expansion lemma of Fomin et al. (STACS 2011) to find such sets efficiently in graphs whose vertex count is superquadratic in their vertex cover number.Comment: 21 pages. Full version of the extended abstract presented at IPEC 201

    Degree-3 Treewidth Sparsifiers

    Full text link
    We study treewidth sparsifiers. Informally, given a graph GG of treewidth kk, a treewidth sparsifier HH is a minor of GG, whose treewidth is close to kk, ∣V(H)∣|V(H)| is small, and the maximum vertex degree in HH is bounded. Treewidth sparsifiers of degree 33 are of particular interest, as routing on node-disjoint paths, and computing minors seems easier in sub-cubic graphs than in general graphs. In this paper we describe an algorithm that, given a graph GG of treewidth kk, computes a topological minor HH of GG such that (i) the treewidth of HH is Ω(k/polylog(k))\Omega(k/\text{polylog}(k)); (ii) ∣V(H)∣=O(k4)|V(H)| = O(k^4); and (iii) the maximum vertex degree in HH is 33. The running time of the algorithm is polynomial in ∣V(G)∣|V(G)| and kk. Our result is in contrast to the known fact that unless NP⊆coNP/polyNP \subseteq coNP/{\sf poly}, treewidth does not admit polynomial-size kernels. One of our key technical tools, which is of independent interest, is a construction of a small minor that preserves node-disjoint routability between two pairs of vertex subsets. This is closely related to the open question of computing small good-quality vertex-cut sparsifiers that are also minors of the original graph.Comment: Extended abstract to appear in Proceedings of ACM-SIAM SODA 201

    Covering Small Independent Sets and Separators with Applications to Parameterized Algorithms

    Full text link
    We present two new combinatorial tools for the design of parameterized algorithms. The first is a simple linear time randomized algorithm that given as input a dd-degenerate graph GG and an integer kk, outputs an independent set YY, such that for every independent set XX in GG of size at most kk, the probability that XX is a subset of YY is at least (((d+1)kk)⋅k(d+1))−1\left({(d+1)k \choose k} \cdot k(d+1)\right)^{-1}.The second is a new (deterministic) polynomial time graph sparsification procedure that given a graph GG, a set T={{s1,t1},{s2,t2},…,{sℓ,tℓ}}T = \{\{s_1, t_1\}, \{s_2, t_2\}, \ldots, \{s_\ell, t_\ell\}\} of terminal pairs and an integer kk, returns an induced subgraph G⋆G^\star of GG that maintains all the inclusion minimal multicuts of GG of size at most kk, and does not contain any (k+2)(k+2)-vertex connected set of size 2O(k)2^{{\cal O}(k)}. In particular, G⋆G^\star excludes a clique of size 2O(k)2^{{\cal O}(k)} as a topological minor. Put together, our new tools yield new randomized fixed parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for Stable ss-tt Separator, Stable Odd Cycle Transversal and Stable Multicut on general graphs, and for Stable Directed Feedback Vertex Set on dd-degenerate graphs, resolving two problems left open by Marx et al. [ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 2013]. All of our algorithms can be derandomized at the cost of a small overhead in the running time.Comment: 35 page

    Sparsification Lower Bounds for List H-Coloring

    Get PDF
    We investigate the List H-Coloring problem, the generalization of graph coloring that asks whether an input graph G admits a homomorphism to the undirected graph H (possibly with loops), such that each vertex v ? V(G) is mapped to a vertex on its list L(v) ? V(H). An important result by Feder, Hell, and Huang [JGT 2003] states that List H-Coloring is polynomial-time solvable if H is a so-called bi-arc graph, and NP-complete otherwise. We investigate the NP-complete cases of the problem from the perspective of polynomial-time sparsification: can an n-vertex instance be efficiently reduced to an equivalent instance of bitsize ?(n^(2-?)) for some ? > 0? We prove that if H is not a bi-arc graph, then List H-Coloring does not admit such a sparsification algorithm unless NP ? coNP/poly. Our proofs combine techniques from kernelization lower bounds with a study of the structure of graphs H which are not bi-arc graphs
    • …
    corecore