1,644 research outputs found
On Selective-Opening Security of Deterministic Primitives
Classically, selective-opening attack (SOA) has been studied for randomized primitives, like randomized encryption schemes and commitments. The study of SOA for deterministic primitives, which presents some unique challenges, was initiated by Bellare et al. (PKC 2015), who showed negative results. Subsequently, Hoang et al. (ASIACRYPT 2016) showed positive results in the non-programmable random oracle model. Here we show the first positive results for SOA security of deterministic primitives in the standard (RO devoid) model. Our results are:
\begin{itemize}
\item Any -wise independent hash function is SOA secure for an unbounded number of ``-correlated\u27\u27 messages, meaning any group of up to messages are arbitrarily correlated.
\item An analogous result for deterministic encryption, from close variant of a NPROM scheme proposed by Hoang et al.
\item We connect the one-more-RSA problem of Bellare et al. (J.~Cryptology 2003) to this context and demonstrate this problem is hard under the -Hiding Assumption with large enough encryption exponent.
\end{itemize}
Our results indicate that SOA for deterministic primitives in the standard model is more tractable than prior work would indicate
Secret-Sharing for NP
A computational secret-sharing scheme is a method that enables a dealer, that
has a secret, to distribute this secret among a set of parties such that a
"qualified" subset of parties can efficiently reconstruct the secret while any
"unqualified" subset of parties cannot efficiently learn anything about the
secret. The collection of "qualified" subsets is defined by a Boolean function.
It has been a major open problem to understand which (monotone) functions can
be realized by a computational secret-sharing schemes. Yao suggested a method
for secret-sharing for any function that has a polynomial-size monotone circuit
(a class which is strictly smaller than the class of monotone functions in P).
Around 1990 Rudich raised the possibility of obtaining secret-sharing for all
monotone functions in NP: In order to reconstruct the secret a set of parties
must be "qualified" and provide a witness attesting to this fact.
Recently, Garg et al. (STOC 2013) put forward the concept of witness
encryption, where the goal is to encrypt a message relative to a statement "x
in L" for a language L in NP such that anyone holding a witness to the
statement can decrypt the message, however, if x is not in L, then it is
computationally hard to decrypt. Garg et al. showed how to construct several
cryptographic primitives from witness encryption and gave a candidate
construction.
One can show that computational secret-sharing implies witness encryption for
the same language. Our main result is the converse: we give a construction of a
computational secret-sharing scheme for any monotone function in NP assuming
witness encryption for NP and one-way functions. As a consequence we get a
completeness theorem for secret-sharing: computational secret-sharing scheme
for any single monotone NP-complete function implies a computational
secret-sharing scheme for every monotone function in NP
On the Gold Standard for Security of Universal Steganography
While symmetric-key steganography is quite well understood both in the
information-theoretic and in the computational setting, many fundamental
questions about its public-key counterpart resist persistent attempts to solve
them. The computational model for public-key steganography was proposed by von
Ahn and Hopper in EUROCRYPT 2004. At TCC 2005, Backes and Cachin gave the first
universal public-key stegosystem - i.e. one that works on all channels -
achieving security against replayable chosen-covertext attacks (SS-RCCA) and
asked whether security against non-replayable chosen-covertext attacks (SS-CCA)
is achievable. Later, Hopper (ICALP 2005) provided such a stegosystem for every
efficiently sampleable channel, but did not achieve universality. He posed the
question whether universality and SS-CCA-security can be achieved
simultaneously. No progress on this question has been achieved since more than
a decade. In our work we solve Hopper's problem in a somehow complete manner:
As our main positive result we design an SS-CCA-secure stegosystem that works
for every memoryless channel. On the other hand, we prove that this result is
the best possible in the context of universal steganography. We provide a
family of 0-memoryless channels - where the already sent documents have only
marginal influence on the current distribution - and prove that no
SS-CCA-secure steganography for this family exists in the standard
non-look-ahead model.Comment: EUROCRYPT 2018, llncs styl
Functional Commitment Schemes: From Polynomial Commitments to Pairing-Based Accumulators from Simple Assumptions
International audienceWe formalize a cryptographic primitive called functional commitment (FC) which can be viewed as a generalization of vector commitments (VCs), polynomial commitments and many other special kinds of commitment schemes. A non-interactive functional commitment allows committing to a message in such a way that the committer has the flexibility of only revealing a function F (M) of the committed message during the opening phase. We provide constructions for the functionality of linear functions, where messages consist of a vectors of n elements over some domain D (e.g., m = (m_1,. .. , m_n) â D_n) and commitments can later be opened to a specific linear function of the vector coordinates. An opening for a function F : D_n â R thus generates a witness for the fact that F (m) indeed evaluates to y â R. One security requirement is called function binding and requires that no adversary be able to open a commitment to two different evaluations y, y for the same function F. We propose a construction of functional commitment for linear functions based on constant-size assumptions in composite order groups endowed with a bilinear map. The construction has commitments and openings of constant size (i.e., independent of n or function description) and is perfectly hiding â the underlying message is information theoretically hidden. Our security proofs builds on the DĂ©jĂ Q framework of Chase and Meiklejohn (Eurocrypt 2014) and its extension by Wee (TCC 2016) to encryption primitives, thus relying on constant-size subgroup decisional assumptions. We show that the FC for linear functions are sufficiently powerful to solve four open problems. They, first, imply polynomial commitments, and, then, give cryptographic accumulators (i.e., an algebraic hash function which makes it possible to efficiently prove that some input belongs to a hashed set). In particular, specializing our FC construction leads to the first pairing-based polynomial commitments and accumulators for large universes known to achieve security under simple assumptions. We also substantially extend our pairing-based accumulator to handle subset queries which requires a non-trivial extension of the DĂ©jĂ Q framework
SO-CCA Secure PKE in the Quantum Random Oracle Model or the Quantum Ideal Cipher Model
Selective opening (SO) security is one of the most important security notions of public key encryption (PKE) in a multi-user setting. Even though messages and random coins used in some ciphertexts are leaked, SO security guarantees the confidentiality of the other ciphertexts. Actually, it is shown that there exist PKE schemes which meet the standard security such as indistinguishability against chosen ciphertext attacks (IND-CCA security) but do not meet SO security against chosen ciphertext attacks. Hence, it is important to consider SO security in the multi-user setting. On the other hand, many researchers have studied cryptosystems in the security model where adversaries can submit quantum superposition queries (i.e., quantum queries) to oracles. In particular, IND-CCA secure PKE and KEM schemes in the quantum random oracle model have been intensively studied so far. In this paper, we show that two kinds of constructions of hybrid encryption schemes meet simulation-based SO security against chosen ciphertext attacks (SIM-SO-CCA security) in the quantum random oracle model or the quantum ideal cipher model. The first scheme is constructed from any IND-CCA secure KEM and any simulatable data encapsulation mechanism (DEM). The second one is constructed from any IND-CCA secure KEM based on Fujisaki-Okamoto transformation and any strongly unforgeable message authentication code (MAC). We can apply any IND-CCA secure KEM scheme to the first one if the underlying DEM scheme meets simulatability, whereas we can apply strongly unforgeable MAC to the second one if the underlying KEM is based on Fujisaki-Okamoto transformation
Quantum Computers and Quantum Coherence
If the states of spins in solids can be created, manipulated, and measured at
the single-quantum level, an entirely new form of information processing,
quantum computing, will be possible. We first give an overview of quantum
information processing, showing that the famous Shor speedup of integer
factoring is just one of a host of important applications for qubits, including
cryptography, counterfeit protection, channel capacity enhancement, distributed
computing, and others. We review our proposed spin-quantum dot architecture for
a quantum computer, and we indicate a variety of first generation materials,
optical, and electrical measurements which should be considered. We analyze the
efficiency of a two-dot device as a transmitter of quantum information via the
ballistic propagation of carriers in a Fermi sea.Comment: 13 pages, latex, one eps figure. Prepared for special issue of J.
Mag. Magn. Matl., "Magnetism beyond 2000". Version 2: small revisions and
correction
Non-malleable secret sharing against joint tampering attacks
Since thousands of years ago, the goal of cryptography has been to hide messages from prying eyes. In recent times, cryptography two important changes: first, cryptography itself evolved from just being about encryption to a broader class of situations coming from the digital era; second, the way of studying cryptography evolved from creating ``seemingly hard'' cryptographic schemes to constructing schemes which are provably secure.
However, once the mathematical abstraction of cryptographic primitives started to be too hard to break, attackers found another way to defeat security. Side channel attacks have been proved to be very effective in this task, breaking the security of otherwise provably secure schemes. Because of this, recent trends in cryptography aim to capture this situation and construct schemes that are secure even against such powerful attacks.
In this setting, this thesis specializes in the study of secret sharing, an important cryptographic primitive that allows to balance privacy and integrity of data and also has applications to multi-party protocols. Namely, continuing the trend which aims to protect against side channel attacks, this thesis brings some contributions to the state of the art of the so-called leakage-resilient and non-malleable secret sharing schemes, which have stronger guarantees against attackers that are able to learn information from possibly all the shares and even tamper with the shares and see the effects of the tampering.
The main contributions of this thesis are twofold. First, we construct secret sharing schemes that are secure against a very powerful class of attacks which, informally, allows the attacker to jointly leak some information and tamper with the shares in a continuous fashion. Second, we study the capacity of continuously non-malleable secret sharing schemes, that is, the maximum achievable information rate. Roughly speaking, we find some lower bounds to the size that the shares must have in order to achieve some forms of non-malleability
Design and Analysis of Opaque Signatures
Digital signatures were introduced to guarantee the authenticity and integrity of the underlying messages. A digital signature scheme comprises the key generation, the signature, and the verification algorithms. The key generation algorithm creates the signing and the verifying keys, called also the signerâs private and public keys respectively. The signature algorithm, which is run by the signer, produces a signature on the input message. Finally, the verification algorithm, run by anyone who knows the signerâs public key, checks whether a purported signature on some message is valid or not. The last property, namely the universal verification of digital signatures is undesirable in situations where the signed data is commercially or personally sensitive. Therefore, mechanisms which share most properties with digital signatures except for the universal verification were invented to respond to the aforementioned need; we call such mechanisms âopaque signaturesâ. In this thesis, we study the signatures where the verification cannot be achieved without the cooperation of a specific entity, namely the signer in case of undeniable signatures, or the confirmer in case of confirmer signatures; we make three main contributions. We first study the relationship between two security properties important for public key encryption, namely data privacy and key privacy. Our study is motivated by the fact that opaque signatures involve always an encryption layer that ensures their opacity. The properties required for this encryption vary according to whether we want to protect the identity (i.e. the key) of the signer or hide the validity of the signature. Therefore, it would be convenient to use existing work about the encryption scheme in order to derive one notion from the other. Next, we delve into the generic constructions of confirmer signatures from basic cryptographic primitives, e.g. digital signatures, encryption, or commitment schemes. In fact, generic constructions give easy-to-understand and easy-to-prove schemes, however, this convenience is often achieved at the expense of efficiency. In this contribution, which constitutes the core of this thesis, we first analyze the already existing constructions; our study concludes that the popular generic constructions of confirmer signatures necessitate strong security assumptions on the building blocks, which impacts negatively the efficiency of the resulting signatures. Next, we show that a small change in these constructionsmakes these assumptions drop drastically, allowing as a result constructions with instantiations that compete with the dedicated realizations of these signatures. Finally, we revisit two early undeniable signatures which were proposed with a conjectural security. We disprove the claimed security of the first scheme, and we provide a fix to it in order to achieve strong security properties. Next, we upgrade the second scheme so that it supports a iii desirable feature, and we provide a formal security treatment of the new scheme: we prove that it is secure assuming new reasonable assumptions on the underlying constituents
- âŠ