Verified AIG Algorithms in ACL2

And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs) are a popular way to represent Boolean functions (like circuits). AIG simplification algorithms can dramatically reduce an AIG, and play an important role in modern hardware verification tools like equivalence checkers. In practice, these tricky algorithms are implemented with optimized C or C++ routines with no guarantee of correctness. Meanwhile, many interactive theorem provers can now employ SAT or SMT solvers to automatically solve finite goals, but no theorem prover makes use of these advanced, AIG-based approaches. We have developed two ways to represent AIGs within the ACL2 theorem prover. One representation, Hons-AIGs, is especially convenient to use and reason about. The other, Aignet, is the opposite; it is styled after modern AIG packages and allows for efficient algorithms. We have implemented functions for converting between these representations, random vector simulation, conversion to CNF, etc., and developed reasoning strategies for verifying these algorithms. Aside from these contributions towards verifying AIG algorithms, this work has an immediate, practical benefit for ACL2 users who are using GL to bit-blast finite ACL2 theorems: they can now optionally trust an off-the-shelf SAT solver to carry out the proof, instead of using the built-in BDD package. Looking to the future, it is a first step toward implementing verified AIG simplification algorithms that might further improve GL performance.Comment: In Proceedings ACL2 2013, arXiv:1304.712

Towards a Framework for Managing Inconsistencies in Systems of Systems

The growth in the complexity of software systems has led to a proliferation of systems that have been created independently to provide specific functions, such as activity tracking, household energy management or personal nutrition assistance. The runtime composition of these individual systems into Systems of Systems (SoSs) enables support for more sophisticated functionality that cannot be provided by individual constituent systems on their own. However, in order to realize the benefits of these functionalities it is necessary to address a number of challenges associated with SoSs, including, but not limited to, operational and managerial independence, geographic distribution of participating systems, evolutionary development, and emergent conflicting behavior that can occur due interactions between the requirements of the participating systems. In this paper, we present a framework for conflict management in SoSs. The management of conflicting requirements involves four steps, namely (a) overlap detection, (b) conflict identification, (c) conflict diagnosis, and (d) conflict resolution based on the use of a utility function. The framework uses a Monitor-Analyze-Plan- Execute- Knowledge (MAPE-K) architectural pattern. In order to illustrate the work, we use an example SoS ecosystem designed to support food security at different levels of granularity

CDCL SAT solver heuristics: Clause management, instance structure, and decisions

The Boolean satisfiability problem or SAT is the problem of deciding if a Boolean formula has a satisfying assignment. It was the first problem shown to be NP-complete, and remains one of the most well-known and studied NP-complete problems. We do not expect to find a polynomial time algorithm that solves all SAT problems, as this would imply equivalence of the complexity classes P and NP, which seems unlikely. However, there are algorithms and heuristics to solve SAT problems that are often effective in practice. A SAT solver is a program that takes as input a Boolean formula and tries to find a satisfying assignment for it. The most-used algorithm in SAT solvers intended for solving real-world problems is known as Conflict Driven Clause Learning, abbreviated CDCL. Due to its broad usage, improving the performance of these solvers can have a large impact on other fields that use SAT solvers and also make SAT solving a useful tool for more applications. The practical performance of CDCL SAT solvers depends critically on a small number of key heuristic mechanisms, and works on these heuristics over the past 20 years have improved CDCL solver performance significantly. This dissertation contributes to our understanding of two of the key heuristic mechanisms, known as the decision heuristic and the clause database management scheme. There are two main foci, which are closely related. First, we focus on developing light weighted methods to use measures of instance structure in solver heuristics. The structure of instances arising from real-world problems seems to be one of the main features that makes them special but there is little work exploiting structural properties within CDCL solvers. We introduce a new structural measure for SAT instances, called Centrality, and show that this measure can be used in both decision and clause management heuristics to improve solver performance. Second, we study different components of clause database management schemes in order to understand and improve them. We categorize clauses as permanent and temporary, show that the permanent set is key to solver performance and propose modifications to the criteria for permanent clauses to improve performance. In recent years, clause database management strategies used in high-performance solvers have become complex, making their study and refinement difficult. We introduce a new clause reduction scheme, called online deletion, which is simple to implement and results in comparable performance

Searching for patterns in Conway's Game of Life

Conway’s Game of Life (Life) is a simple cellular automaton, discovered by John Conway in 1970, that exhibits complex emergent behavior. Life-enthusiasts have been looking for building blocks with specific properties (patterns) to answer unsolved problems in Life for the past five decades. Finding patterns in Life is difficult due to the large search space. Current search algorithms use an explorative approach based on the rules of the game, but this can only sample a small fraction of the search space. More recently, people have used Sat solvers to search for patterns. These solvers are not specifically tuned to this problem and thus waste a lot of time processing Life’s rules in an engine that does not understand them. We propose a novel Sat-based approach that replaces the binary tree used by traditional Sat solvers with a grid-based approach, complemented by an injection of Game of Life specific knowledge. This leads to a significant speedup in searching. As a fortunate side effect, our solver can be generalized to solve general Sat problems. Because it is grid-based, all manipulations are embarrassingly parallel, allowing implementation on massively parallel hardware

Recognition and Exploitation of Gate Structure in SAT Solving

In der theoretischen Informatik ist das SAT-Problem der archetypische Vertreter der Klasse der NP-vollständigen Probleme, weshalb effizientes SAT-Solving im Allgemeinen als unmöglich angesehen wird. Dennoch erzielt man in der Praxis oft erstaunliche Resultate, wo einige Anwendungen Probleme mit Millionen von Variablen erzeugen, die von neueren SAT-Solvern in angemessener Zeit gelöst werden können. Der Erfolg von SAT-Solving in der Praxis ist auf aktuelle Implementierungen des Conflict Driven Clause-Learning (CDCL) Algorithmus zurückzuführen, dessen Leistungsfähigkeit weitgehend von den verwendeten Heuristiken abhängt, welche implizit die Struktur der in der industriellen Praxis erzeugten Instanzen ausnutzen. In dieser Arbeit stellen wir einen neuen generischen Algorithmus zur effizienten Erkennung der Gate-Struktur in CNF-Encodings von SAT Instanzen vor, und außerdem drei Ansätze, in denen wir diese Struktur explizit ausnutzen. Unsere Beiträge umfassen auch die Implementierung dieser Ansätze in unserem SAT-Solver Candy und die Entwicklung eines Werkzeugs für die verteilte Verwaltung von Benchmark-Instanzen und deren Attribute, der Global Benchmark Database (GBD)