On Percolation and NP-Hardness

The edge-percolation and vertex-percolation random graph models start with an arbitrary graph G, and randomly delete edges or vertices of G with some fixed probability. We study the computational hardness of problems whose inputs are obtained by applying percolation to worst-case instances. Specifically, we show that a number of classical N P-hard graph problems remain essentially as hard on percolated instances as they are in the worst-case (assuming NP !subseteq BPP). We also prove hardness results for other NP-hard problems such as Constraint Satisfaction Problems, where random deletions are applied to clauses or variables. We focus on proving the hardness of the Maximum Independent Set problem and the Graph Coloring problem on percolated instances. To show this we establish the robustness of the corresponding parameters alpha(.) and Chi(.) to percolation, which may be of independent interest. Given a graph G, let G\u27 be the graph obtained by randomly deleting edges of G. We show that if alpha(G) is small, then alpha(G\u27) remains small with probability at least 0.99. Similarly, we show that if Chi(G) is large, then Chi(G\u27) remains large with probability at least 0.99

Phase Transitions of the Typical Algorithmic Complexity of the Random Satisfiability Problem Studied with Linear Programming

Here we study the NP-complete $K$-SAT problem. Although the worst-case complexity of NP-complete problems is conjectured to be exponential, there exist parametrized random ensembles of problems where solutions can typically be found in polynomial time for suitable ranges of the parameter. In fact, random $K$-SAT, with $\alpha=M/N$ as control parameter, can be solved quickly for small enough values of $\alpha$. It shows a phase transition between a satisfiable phase and an unsatisfiable phase. For branch and bound algorithms, which operate in the space of feasible Boolean configurations, the empirically hardest problems are located only close to this phase transition. Here we study $K$-SAT ($K=3,4$) and the related optimization problem MAX-SAT by a linear programming approach, which is widely used for practical problems and allows for polynomial run time. In contrast to branch and bound it operates outside the space of feasible configurations. On the other hand, finding a solution within polynomial time is not guaranteed. We investigated several variants like including artificial objective functions, so called cutting-plane approaches, and a mapping to the NP-complete vertex-cover problem. We observed several easy-hard transitions, from where the problems are typically solvable (in polynomial time) using the given algorithms, respectively, to where they are not solvable in polynomial time. For the related vertex-cover problem on random graphs these easy-hard transitions can be identified with structural properties of the graphs, like percolation transitions. For the present random $K$-SAT problem we have investigated numerous structural properties also exhibiting clear transitions, but they appear not be correlated to the here observed easy-hard transitions. This renders the behaviour of random $K$-SAT more complex than, e.g., the vertex-cover problem.Comment: 11 pages, 5 figure

Computing the Difficulty of Critical Bootstrap Percolation Models is NP-hard

Bootstrap percolation is a class of cellular automata with random initial state. Two-dimensional bootstrap percolation models have three universality classes, the most studied being the `critical' one. For this class the scaling of the quantity of greatest interest -- the critical probability -- was determined by Bollobás, Duminil-Copin, Morris and Smith in terms of a combinatorial quantity called `difficulty', so the subject seemed closed up to finding sharper results. In this paper we prove that computing the difficulty of a critical model is NP-hard and exhibit an algorithm to determine it, in contrast with the upcoming result of Balister, Bollobás, Morris and Smith on undecidability in higher dimensions. The proof of NP-hardness is achieved by a reduction to the Set Cover problem

Stability of Influence Maximization

The present article serves as an erratum to our paper of the same title, which was presented and published in the KDD 2014 conference. In that article, we claimed falsely that the objective function defined in Section 1.4 is non-monotone submodular. We are deeply indebted to Debmalya Mandal, Jean Pouget-Abadie and Yaron Singer for bringing to our attention a counter-example to that claim. Subsequent to becoming aware of the counter-example, we have shown that the objective function is in fact NP-hard to approximate to within a factor of $O(n^{1-\epsilon})$ for any $\epsilon > 0$. In an attempt to fix the record, the present article combines the problem motivation, models, and experimental results sections from the original incorrect article with the new hardness result. We would like readers to only cite and use this version (which will remain an unpublished note) instead of the incorrect conference version.Comment: Erratum of Paper "Stability of Influence Maximization" which was presented and published in the KDD1

What makes a phase transition? Analysis of the random satisfiability problem

In the last 30 years it was found that many combinatorial systems undergo phase transitions. One of the most important examples of these can be found among the random k-satisfiability problems (often referred to as k-SAT), asking whether there exists an assignment of Boolean values satisfying a Boolean formula composed of clauses with k random variables each. The random 3-SAT problem is reported to show various phase transitions at different critical values of the ratio of the number of clauses to the number of variables. The most famous of these occurs when the probability of finding a satisfiable instance suddenly drops from 1 to 0. This transition is associated with a rise in the hardness of the problem, but until now the correlation between any of the proposed phase transitions and the hardness is not totally clear. In this paper we will first show numerically that the number of solutions universally follows a lognormal distribution, thereby explaining the puzzling question of why the number of solutions is still exponential at the critical point. Moreover we provide evidence that the hardness of the closely related problem of counting the total number of solutions does not show any phase transition-like behavior. This raises the question of whether the probability of finding a satisfiable instance is really an order parameter of a phase transition or whether it is more likely to just show a simple sharp threshold phenomenon. More generally, this paper aims at starting a discussion where a simple sharp threshold phenomenon turns into a genuine phase transition