22,092 research outputs found
A composition theorem for parity kill number
In this work, we study the parity complexity measures
and .
is the \emph{parity kill number} of , the
fewest number of parities on the input variables one has to fix in order to
"kill" , i.e. to make it constant. is the depth
of the shortest \emph{parity decision tree} which computes . These
complexity measures have in recent years become increasingly important in the
fields of communication complexity \cite{ZS09, MO09, ZS10, TWXZ13} and
pseudorandomness \cite{BK12, Sha11, CT13}.
Our main result is a composition theorem for .
The -th power of , denoted , is the function which results
from composing with itself times. We prove that if is not a parity
function, then In other words, the parity kill number of
is essentially supermultiplicative in the \emph{normal} kill number of
(also known as the minimum certificate complexity).
As an application of our composition theorem, we show lower bounds on the
parity complexity measures of and . Here is the sort function due to Ambainis \cite{Amb06},
and is Kushilevitz's hemi-icosahedron function \cite{NW95}. In
doing so, we disprove a conjecture of Montanaro and Osborne \cite{MO09} which
had applications to communication complexity and computational learning theory.
In addition, we give new lower bounds for conjectures of \cite{MO09,ZS10} and
\cite{TWXZ13}
On the parity complexity measures of Boolean functions
The parity decision tree model extends the decision tree model by allowing
the computation of a parity function in one step. We prove that the
deterministic parity decision tree complexity of any Boolean function is
polynomially related to the non-deterministic complexity of the function or its
complement. We also show that they are polynomially related to an analogue of
the block sensitivity. We further study parity decision trees in their
relations with an intermediate variant of the decision trees, as well as with
communication complexity.Comment: submitted to TCS on 16-MAR-200
Fourier sparsity, spectral norm, and the Log-rank conjecture
We study Boolean functions with sparse Fourier coefficients or small spectral
norm, and show their applications to the Log-rank Conjecture for XOR functions
f(x\oplus y) --- a fairly large class of functions including well studied ones
such as Equality and Hamming Distance. The rank of the communication matrix M_f
for such functions is exactly the Fourier sparsity of f. Let d be the F2-degree
of f and D^CC(f) stand for the deterministic communication complexity for
f(x\oplus y). We show that 1. D^CC(f) = O(2^{d^2/2} log^{d-2} ||\hat f||_1). In
particular, the Log-rank conjecture holds for XOR functions with constant
F2-degree. 2. D^CC(f) = O(d ||\hat f||_1) = O(\sqrt{rank(M_f)}\logrank(M_f)).
We obtain our results through a degree-reduction protocol based on a variant of
polynomial rank, and actually conjecture that its communication cost is already
\log^{O(1)}rank(M_f). The above bounds also hold for the parity decision tree
complexity of f, a measure that is no less than the communication complexity
(up to a factor of 2).
Along the way we also show several structural results about Boolean functions
with small F2-degree or small spectral norm, which could be of independent
interest. For functions f with constant F2-degree: 1) f can be written as the
summation of quasi-polynomially many indicator functions of subspaces with
\pm-signs, improving the previous doubly exponential upper bound by Green and
Sanders; 2) being sparse in Fourier domain is polynomially equivalent to having
a small parity decision tree complexity; 3) f depends only on polylog||\hat
f||_1 linear functions of input variables. For functions f with small spectral
norm: 1) there is an affine subspace with co-dimension O(||\hat f||_1) on which
f is a constant; 2) there is a parity decision tree with depth O(||\hat f||_1
log ||\hat f||_0).Comment: v2: Corollary 31 of v1 removed because of a bug in the proof. (Other
results not affected.
- …