10,807 research outputs found

    Weighted Polynomial Approximations: Limits for Learning and Pseudorandomness

    Get PDF
    Polynomial approximations to boolean functions have led to many positive results in computer science. In particular, polynomial approximations to the sign function underly algorithms for agnostically learning halfspaces, as well as pseudorandom generators for halfspaces. In this work, we investigate the limits of these techniques by proving inapproximability results for the sign function. Firstly, the polynomial regression algorithm of Kalai et al. (SIAM J. Comput. 2008) shows that halfspaces can be learned with respect to log-concave distributions on Rn\mathbb{R}^n in the challenging agnostic learning model. The power of this algorithm relies on the fact that under log-concave distributions, halfspaces can be approximated arbitrarily well by low-degree polynomials. We ask whether this technique can be extended beyond log-concave distributions, and establish a negative result. We show that polynomials of any degree cannot approximate the sign function to within arbitrarily low error for a large class of non-log-concave distributions on the real line, including those with densities proportional to exp(x0.99)\exp(-|x|^{0.99}). Secondly, we investigate the derandomization of Chernoff-type concentration inequalities. Chernoff-type tail bounds on sums of independent random variables have pervasive applications in theoretical computer science. Schmidt et al. (SIAM J. Discrete Math. 1995) showed that these inequalities can be established for sums of random variables with only O(log(1/δ))O(\log(1/\delta))-wise independence, for a tail probability of δ\delta. We show that their results are tight up to constant factors. These results rely on techniques from weighted approximation theory, which studies how well functions on the real line can be approximated by polynomials under various distributions. We believe that these techniques will have further applications in other areas of computer science.Comment: 22 page

    Learning Coverage Functions and Private Release of Marginals

    Full text link
    We study the problem of approximating and learning coverage functions. A function c:2[n]R+c: 2^{[n]} \rightarrow \mathbf{R}^{+} is a coverage function, if there exists a universe UU with non-negative weights w(u)w(u) for each uUu \in U and subsets A1,A2,,AnA_1, A_2, \ldots, A_n of UU such that c(S)=uiSAiw(u)c(S) = \sum_{u \in \cup_{i \in S} A_i} w(u). Alternatively, coverage functions can be described as non-negative linear combinations of monotone disjunctions. They are a natural subclass of submodular functions and arise in a number of applications. We give an algorithm that for any γ,δ>0\gamma,\delta>0, given random and uniform examples of an unknown coverage function cc, finds a function hh that approximates cc within factor 1+γ1+\gamma on all but δ\delta-fraction of the points in time poly(n,1/γ,1/δ)poly(n,1/\gamma,1/\delta). This is the first fully-polynomial algorithm for learning an interesting class of functions in the demanding PMAC model of Balcan and Harvey (2011). Our algorithms are based on several new structural properties of coverage functions. Using the results in (Feldman and Kothari, 2014), we also show that coverage functions are learnable agnostically with excess 1\ell_1-error ϵ\epsilon over all product and symmetric distributions in time nlog(1/ϵ)n^{\log(1/\epsilon)}. In contrast, we show that, without assumptions on the distribution, learning coverage functions is at least as hard as learning polynomial-size disjoint DNF formulas, a class of functions for which the best known algorithm runs in time 2O~(n1/3)2^{\tilde{O}(n^{1/3})} (Klivans and Servedio, 2004). As an application of our learning results, we give simple differentially-private algorithms for releasing monotone conjunction counting queries with low average error. In particular, for any knk \leq n, we obtain private release of kk-way marginals with average error αˉ\bar{\alpha} in time nO(log(1/αˉ))n^{O(\log(1/\bar{\alpha}))}

    Differential Privacy and the Fat-Shattering Dimension of Linear Queries

    Full text link
    In this paper, we consider the task of answering linear queries under the constraint of differential privacy. This is a general and well-studied class of queries that captures other commonly studied classes, including predicate queries and histogram queries. We show that the accuracy to which a set of linear queries can be answered is closely related to its fat-shattering dimension, a property that characterizes the learnability of real-valued functions in the agnostic-learning setting.Comment: Appears in APPROX 201

    Active classification with comparison queries

    Full text link
    We study an extension of active learning in which the learning algorithm may ask the annotator to compare the distances of two examples from the boundary of their label-class. For example, in a recommendation system application (say for restaurants), the annotator may be asked whether she liked or disliked a specific restaurant (a label query); or which one of two restaurants did she like more (a comparison query). We focus on the class of half spaces, and show that under natural assumptions, such as large margin or bounded bit-description of the input examples, it is possible to reveal all the labels of a sample of size nn using approximately O(logn)O(\log n) queries. This implies an exponential improvement over classical active learning, where only label queries are allowed. We complement these results by showing that if any of these assumptions is removed then, in the worst case, Ω(n)\Omega(n) queries are required. Our results follow from a new general framework of active learning with additional queries. We identify a combinatorial dimension, called the \emph{inference dimension}, that captures the query complexity when each additional query is determined by O(1)O(1) examples (such as comparison queries, each of which is determined by the two compared examples). Our results for half spaces follow by bounding the inference dimension in the cases discussed above.Comment: 23 pages (not including references), 1 figure. The new version contains a minor fix in the proof of Lemma 4.
    corecore