79,209 research outputs found

    On dynamic breadth-first search in external-memory

    Get PDF
    We provide the first non-trivial result on dynamic breadth-first search (BFS) in external-memory: For general sparse undirected graphs of initially nn nodes and O(n) edges and monotone update sequences of either Θ(n)\Theta(n) edge insertions or Θ(n)\Theta(n) edge deletions, we prove an amortized high-probability bound of O(n/B^{2/3}+\sort(n)\cdot \log B) I/Os per update. In contrast, the currently best approach for static BFS on sparse undirected graphs requires \Omega(n/B^{1/2}+\sort(n)) I/Os. 1998 ACM Subject Classification: F.2.2. Key words and phrases: External Memory, Dynamic Graph Algorithms, BFS, Randomization

    On Dynamic Breadth-First Search in External-Memory

    Get PDF
    We provide the first non-trivial result on dynamic breadth-first search (BFS) in external-memory: For general sparse undirected graphs of initially nn nodes and O(n)O(n) edges and monotone update sequences of either Theta(n)Theta(n) edge insertions or Theta(n)Theta(n) edge deletions, we prove an amortized high-probability bound of O(n/B2/3+sort(n)cdotlogB)O(n/B^{2/3}+sort(n)cdot log B) I/Os per update. In contrast, the currently best approach for static BFS on sparse undirected graphs requires Omega(n/B1/2+sort(n))Omega(n/B^{1/2}+sort(n)) I/Os

    Designing as Construction of Representations: A Dynamic Viewpoint in Cognitive Design Research

    Get PDF
    This article presents a cognitively oriented viewpoint on design. It focuses on cognitive, dynamic aspects of real design, i.e., the actual cognitive activity implemented by designers during their work on professional design projects. Rather than conceiving de-signing as problem solving - Simon's symbolic information processing (SIP) approach - or as a reflective practice or some other form of situated activity - the situativity (SIT) approach - we consider that, from a cognitive viewpoint, designing is most appropriately characterised as a construction of representations. After a critical discussion of the SIP and SIT approaches to design, we present our view-point. This presentation concerns the evolving nature of representations regarding levels of abstraction and degrees of precision, the function of external representations, and specific qualities of representation in collective design. Designing is described at three levels: the organisation of the activity, its strategies, and its design-representation construction activities (different ways to generate, trans-form, and evaluate representations). Even if we adopt a "generic design" stance, we claim that design can take different forms depending on the nature of the artefact, and we propose some candidates for dimensions that allow a distinction to be made between these forms of design. We discuss the potential specificity of HCI design, and the lack of cognitive design research occupied with the quality of design. We close our discussion of representational structures and activities by an outline of some directions regarding their functional linkages

    Theoretically Efficient Parallel Graph Algorithms Can Be Fast and Scalable

    Full text link
    There has been significant recent interest in parallel graph processing due to the need to quickly analyze the large graphs available today. Many graph codes have been designed for distributed memory or external memory. However, today even the largest publicly-available real-world graph (the Hyperlink Web graph with over 3.5 billion vertices and 128 billion edges) can fit in the memory of a single commodity multicore server. Nevertheless, most experimental work in the literature report results on much smaller graphs, and the ones for the Hyperlink graph use distributed or external memory. Therefore, it is natural to ask whether we can efficiently solve a broad class of graph problems on this graph in memory. This paper shows that theoretically-efficient parallel graph algorithms can scale to the largest publicly-available graphs using a single machine with a terabyte of RAM, processing them in minutes. We give implementations of theoretically-efficient parallel algorithms for 20 important graph problems. We also present the optimizations and techniques that we used in our implementations, which were crucial in enabling us to process these large graphs quickly. We show that the running times of our implementations outperform existing state-of-the-art implementations on the largest real-world graphs. For many of the problems that we consider, this is the first time they have been solved on graphs at this scale. We have made the implementations developed in this work publicly-available as the Graph-Based Benchmark Suite (GBBS).Comment: This is the full version of the paper appearing in the ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA), 201
    corecore