15 research outputs found
On regular languages determined by nondeterministic directable automata
It is known that the languages consisting of directing words of deterministic and nondeterministic automata are regular. Here these classes of regular languages are studied and compared. By introducing further three classes of regular languages, it is proved that the 8 classes considered form a semilattice with respect to intersection
On directable nondeterministic trapped automata
A finite automaton is said to be directable if it has an input word, a directing word, which takes it from every state into the same state. For nondeterministic (n.d.) automata, directability can be generalized in several ways. In [8], three such notions, D1-, D2-, and D3-directability, are introduced. In this paper, we introduce the trapped n.d. automata, and for each i = 1,2,3, present lower and upper bounds for the lengths of the shortest Di-directing words of n-state Di-directable trapped n.d. automata. It turns out that for this special class of n.d. automata, better bounds can be found than for the general case, and some of the obtained bounds are sharp
Synchronizing weighted automata
We introduce two generalizations of synchronizability to automata with
transitions weighted in an arbitrary semiring K=(K,+,*,0,1). (or equivalently,
to finite sets of matrices in K^nxn.) Let us call a matrix A
location-synchronizing if there exists a column in A consisting of nonzero
entries such that all the other columns of A are filled by zeros. If
additionally all the entries of this designated column are the same, we call A
synchronizing. Note that these notions coincide for stochastic matrices and
also in the Boolean semiring. A set M of matrices in K^nxn is called
(location-)synchronizing if M generates a matrix subsemigroup containing a
(location-)synchronizing matrix. The K-(location-)synchronizability problem is
the following: given a finite set M of nxn matrices with entries in K, is it
(location-)synchronizing?
Both problems are PSPACE-hard for any nontrivial semiring. We give sufficient
conditions for the semiring K when the problems are PSPACE-complete and show
several undecidability results as well, e.g. synchronizability is undecidable
if 1 has infinite order in (K,+,0) or when the free semigroup on two generators
can be embedded into (K,*,1).Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2014, arXiv:1405.527
Using Sat solvers for synchronization issues in partial deterministic automata
We approach the task of computing a carefully synchronizing word of minimum
length for a given partial deterministic automaton, encoding the problem as an
instance of SAT and invoking a SAT solver. Our experimental results demonstrate
that this approach gives satisfactory results for automata with up to 100
states even if very modest computational resources are used.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figure