Bar recursion in classical realisability : dependent choice and continuum hypothesis

This paper is about the bar recursion operator in the context of classical realizability. After the pioneering work of Berardi, Bezem & Coquand [1], T. Streicher has shown [10], by means of their bar recursion operator, that the realizability models of ZF, obtained from usual models of $\lambda$-calculus (Scott domains, coherent spaces, . . .), satisfy the axiom of dependent choice. We give a proof of this result, using the tools of classical realizability. Moreover, we show that these realizability models satisfy the well ordering of $\mathbb{R}$ and the continuum hypothesis These formulas are therefore realized by closed $\lambda_c$-terms. This allows to obtain programs from proofs of arithmetical formulas using all these axioms.Comment: 11 page

Applying G\"odel's Dialectica Interpretation to Obtain a Constructive Proof of Higman's Lemma

We use G\"odel's Dialectica interpretation to analyse Nash-Williams' elegant but non-constructive "minimal bad sequence" proof of Higman's Lemma. The result is a concise constructive proof of the lemma (for arbitrary decidable well-quasi-orders) in which Nash-Williams' combinatorial idea is clearly present, along with an explicit program for finding an embedded pair in sequences of words.Comment: In Proceedings CL&C 2012, arXiv:1210.289

The strength of countable saturation

We determine the proof-theoretic strength of the principle of countable saturation in the context of the systems for nonstandard arithmetic introduced in our earlier work.Comment: Corrected typos in Lemma 3.4 and the final paragraph of the conclusio