Offline Signature Verification using CNN

This paper presents the convolutional neural network for feature extraction and Support vector machine for theverification of offline signatures. The cropped signatures are used to train CNN forr extracting features. The Extracted features are classified into two classes genuine or forgery using SVM. The the new signature is tested on GPDS signature data base using the trained SVM. The dabase contains signatures of 960 users and for each user there are 24 genuine signatures and 30 forgeries. The CNN network is trained with 300 users and signatures of 400 users are used for feature learning. These 400x20x25 signatures are used 90%to train and 10% to test SVM classifier

Handwritten signature verification using locally optimized distance-based classification.

Thesis (M.Sc.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville, 2012.Although handwritten signature verification has been extensively researched, it has not achieved optimum accuracy rate. Therefore, efficient and accurate signature verification techniques are required since signatures are still widely used as a means of personal verification. This research work presents efficient distance-based classification techniques as an alternative to supervised learning classification techniques (SLTs). Two different feature extraction techniques were used, namely the Enhanced Modified Direction Feature (EMDF) and the Local Directional Pattern feature (LDP). These were used to analyze the effect of using several different distance-based classification techniques. Among the classification techniques used, are the cosine similarity measure, Mahalanobis, Canberra, Manhattan, Euclidean, weighted Euclidean and fractional distances. Additionally, the novel weighted fractional distances, as well as locally optimized resampling of feature vector sizes were tested. The best accuracy was achieved through applying a combination of the weighted fractional distances and locally optimized resampling classification techniques to the Local Directional Pattern feature extraction. This combination of multiple distance-based classification techniques achieved accuracy rate of 89.2% when using the EMDF feature extraction technique, and 90.8% when using the LDP feature extraction technique. These results are comparable to those in literature, where the same feature extraction techniques were classified with SLTs. The best of the distance-based classification techniques were found to produce greater accuracy than the SLTs

MLCapsule: Guarded Offline Deployment of Machine Learning as a Service

With the widespread use of machine learning (ML) techniques, ML as a service has become increasingly popular. In this setting, an ML model resides on a server and users can query it with their data via an API. However, if the user's input is sensitive, sending it to the server is undesirable and sometimes even legally not possible. Equally, the service provider does not want to share the model by sending it to the client for protecting its intellectual property and pay-per-query business model. In this paper, we propose MLCapsule, a guarded offline deployment of machine learning as a service. MLCapsule executes the model locally on the user's side and therefore the data never leaves the client. Meanwhile, MLCapsule offers the service provider the same level of control and security of its model as the commonly used server-side execution. In addition, MLCapsule is applicable to offline applications that require local execution. Beyond protecting against direct model access, we couple the secure offline deployment with defenses against advanced attacks on machine learning models such as model stealing, reverse engineering, and membership inference

Off-line handwritten signature recognition by wavelet entropy and neural network

Handwritten signatures are widely utilized as a form of personal recognition. However, they have the unfortunate shortcoming of being easily abused by those who would fake the identification or intent of an individual which might be very harmful. Therefore, the need for an automatic signature recognition system is crucial. In this paper, a signature recognition approach based on a probabilistic neural network (PNN) and wavelet transform average framing entropy (AFE) is proposed. The system was tested with a wavelet packet (WP) entropy denoted as a WP entropy neural network system (WPENN) and with a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) entropy denoted as a DWT entropy neural network system (DWENN). Our investigation was conducted over several wavelet families and different entropy types. Identification tasks, as well as verification tasks, were investigated for a comprehensive signature system study. Several other methods used in the literature were considered for comparison. Two databases were used for algorithm testing. The best recognition rate result was achieved by WPENN whereby the threshold entropy reached 92%

Closing the performance gap between siamese networks for dissimilarity image classification and convolutional neural networks

In this paper, we examine two strategies for boosting the performance of ensembles of Siamese networks (SNNs) for image classification using two loss functions (Triplet and Binary Cross Entropy) and two methods for building the dissimilarity spaces (FULLY and DEEPER). With FULLY, the distance between a pattern and a prototype is calculated by comparing two images using the fully connected layer of the Siamese network. With DEEPER, each pattern is described using a deeper layer combined with dimensionality reduction. The basic design of the SNNs takes advantage of supervised k-means clustering for building the dissimilarity spaces that train a set of support vector machines, which are then combined by sum rule for a final decision. The robustness and versatility of this approach are demonstrated on several cross-domain image data sets, including a portrait data set, two bioimage and two animal vocalization data sets. Results show that the strategies employed in this work to increase the performance of dissimilarity image classification using SNN are closing the gap with standalone CNNs. Moreover, when our best system is combined with an ensemble of CNNs, the resulting performance is superior to an ensemble of CNNs, demonstrating that our new strategy is extracting additional information

Automatic intrapersonal variability modeling for offline signature augmentation

Orientador: Luiz Eduardo Soares de OliveiraCoorientadores: Robert Sabourin e Alceu de Souza Britto Jr..Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Exatas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Informática. Defesa : Curitiba, 19/07/2021Inclui referências: p. 93-102Área de concentração: Ciência da ComputaçãoResumo: Normalmente, em um cenario do mundo real, poucas assinaturas estao disponiveis para treinar um sistema de verificacao automatica de assinaturas (SVAA). Para resolver esse problema, diversas abordagens para a duplicacao de assinaturas estaticas foram propostas ao longo dos anos. Essas abordagens geram novas amostras de assinaturas sinteticas aplicando algumas transformacoes na imagem original da assinatura. Algumas delas geram amostras realistas, especialmente o duplicator. Este metodo utiliza um conjunto de parametros para modelar o comportamento do escritor (variabilidade do escritor) ao assinar. No entanto, esses parametros so empiricamente definidos. Este tipo de abordagem pode ser demorado e pode selecionar parametros que nao descrevem a real variabilidade do escritor. A principal hipotese desse trabalho e que a variabilidade do escritor observada no dominio da imagem tambem pode ser transferido para o dominio de caracteristicas. Portanto, este trabalho propoe um novo metodo para modelar automaticamente a variabilidade do escritor para a posterior duplicacao de assinaturas no dominio de imagem (duplicator) e dominio de caracteristicas (filtro Gaussiano e variacao do metodo de Knop). Este trabalho tambem propoe um novo metodo de duplicacao de assinaturas estaticas, que gera as amostras sinteticas diretamente no dominio de caracteristicas usando um filtro Gaussiano. Alem disso, uma nova abordagem para avaliar a qualidade de amostras sinteticas no dominio de caracteristicas e apresentada. As limitacoes e vantagens de ambas as abordagens de duplicacao de assinaturas tambem sao exploradas. Alem de usar a nova abordagem para avaliar a qualidade das amostras, o desempenho de um SVAA e avaliado usando as amostras e tres bases de assinaturas estaticas bem conhecidas: a GPDS-300, a MCYT-75 e a CEDAR. Para a mais utilizada, GPDS-300, quando o classificador SVM foi treinando com somente uma assinatura genuina por escritor, ele obteve um Equal Error Rate (EER) de 5,71%. Quando o classificador tambem utilizou as amostras sinteticas geradas no dominio de imagem, o EER caiu para 1,08%. Quando o classificador foi treinado com as amostras geradas pelo filtro Gaussiano, o EER caiu para 1,04%.Abstract: Normally, in a real-world scenario, there are few signatures available to train an automatic signature verification system (ASVS). To address this issue, several offline signature duplication approaches have been proposed along the years. These approaches generate a new synthetic signature sample applying some transformations in the original signature image. Some of them generate realistic samples, specially the duplicator. This method uses a set of parameters to model the writer's behavior (writer variability) during the signing act. However, these parameters are empirically defined. This kind of approach can be time consuming and can select parameters that do not describe the real writer variability. The main hypothesis of this work is that the writer variability observed in the image space can be transferred to the feature space as well. Therefore, this work proposes a new method to automatically model the writer variability for further signature duplication in the image (duplicator) and the feature space (Gaussian filter and a variation of Knop's method). This work also proposes a new offline signature duplication method, which directly generates the synthetic samples in the feature space using a Gaussian filter. Furthermore, a new approach to assess the quality of the synthetic samples in the feature space is introduced. The limitations and advantages of both signature augmentation approaches are also explored. Despite using the new approach to assess the quality of the samples, the performance of an ASVS was assessed using them and three well-known offline signature datasets: GPDS-300, MCYT-75, and CEDAR. For the most used one, GPDS-300, when the SVM classifier was trained with only one genuine signature per writer, it achieved an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 5.71%. When the classifier also was trained with the synthetic samples generated in the image space, the EER dropped to 1.08%. When the classifier was trained using the synthetic samples generated by the Gaussian filter, the EER dropped to 1.04%