An examination of quantitative methods for Forensic Signature Analysis and the admissibility of signature verification system as legal evidence.

The experiments described in this thesis deal with handwriting characteristics which are involved in the production of forged and genuine signatures and complexity of signatures. The objectives of this study were (1) to provide su?cient details on which of the signature characteristics are easier to forge, (2) to investigate the capabilities of the signature complexity formula given by Found et al. based on a different signature database provided by University of Kent. This database includes the writing movements of 10 writers producing their genuine signature and of 140 writers forging these sample signatures. Using the 150 genuine signatures without constrictions of the Kent’s database an evaluation of the complexity formula suggested in Found et al took place divided the signature in three categories low, medium and high graphical complexity. The results of the formula implementation were compared with the opinions of three leading professional forensic document examiners employed by Key Forensics in the UK. The analysis of data for Study I reveals that there is not ample evidence that high quality forgeries are possible after training. In addition, a closer view of the kinematics of the forging writers is responsible for our main conclusion, that forged signatures are widely different from genuine especially in the kinematic domain. From all the parameters used in this study 11 out of 15 experienced significant changes when the comparison of the two groups (genuine versus forged signature) took place and gave a clear picture of which parameters can assist forensic document examiners and can be used by them to examine the signatures forgeries. The movements of the majority of forgers are signi?cantly slower than those of authentic writers. It is also clearly recognizable that the majority of forgers perform higher levels of pressure when trying to forge the genuine signature. The results of Study II although limited and not entirely consistent with the study of Found that proposed this model, indicate that the model can provide valuable objective evidence (regarding complex signatures) in the forensic environment and justify its further investigation but more work is need to be done in order to use this type of models in the court of law. The model was able to predict correctly only 53% of the FDEs opinion regarding the complexity of the signatures. Apart from the above investigations in this study there will be also a reference at the debate which has started in recent years that is challenging the validity of forensic handwriting experts’ skills and at the effort which has begun by interested parties of this sector to validate and standardise the field of forensic handwriting examination and a discussion started. This effort reveals that forensic document analysis field meets all factors which were set by Daubert ruling in terms of theory proven, education, training, certification, falsifiability, error rate, peer review and publication, general acceptance. However innovative methods are needed for the development of forensic document analysis discipline. Most modern and effective solution in order to prevent observational and emotional bias would be the development of an automated handwriting or signature analysis system. This system will have many advantages in real cases scenario. In addition the significant role of computer-assisted handwriting analysis in the daily work of forensic document examiners (FDE) or the judicial system is in agreement with the assessment of the National Research Council of United States that “the scientific basis for handwriting comparison needs to be strengthened”, however it seems that further research is required in order to be able these systems to reach the accomplishment point of this objective and overcome legal obstacles presented in this study

e-BioSign Tool: Towards Scientific Assessment of Dynamic Signatures under Forensic Conditions

Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. R. Vera-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez, J. Ortega-Garcia, A. Acien and R. Tolosana, "e-BioSign tool: Towards scientific assessment of dynamic signatures under forensic conditions," 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS), Arlington, VA, 2015, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/BTAS.2015.7358756This paper presents a new tool specifically designed to carry out dynamic signature forensic analysis and give sci- entific support to forensic handwriting examiners (FHEs). Traditionally FHEs have performed forensic analysis of paper-based signatures for court cases, but with the rapid evolution of the technology, nowadays they are being asked to carry out analysis based on signatures acquired by digi- tizing tablets more and more often. In some cases, an option followed has been to obtain a paper impression of these sig- natures and carry out a traditional analysis, but there are many deficiencies in this approach regarding the low spa- tial resolution of some devices compared to original off-line signatures and also the fact that the dynamic information, which has been proved to be very discriminative by the bio- metric community, is lost and not taken into account at all. The tool we present in this paper allows the FHEs to carry out a forensic analysis taking into account both the tra- ditional off-line information normally used in paper-based signature analysis, and also the dynamic information of the signatures. Additionally, the tool incorporates two impor- tant functionalities, the first is the provision of statistical support to the analysis by including population statistics for genuine and forged signatures for some selected features, and the second is the incorporation of an automatic dy- namic signature matcher, from which a likelihood ratio (LR) can be obtained from the matching comparison between the known and questioned signatures under analysis.This work was supported in part by the Project Bio-Shield (TEC2012-34881), in part by Cecabank e-BioFirma Contract, in part by the BEAT Project (FP7-SEC-284989) and in part by Catedra UAM-Telefonica

Using a Goal-Driven Approach in the Investigation of a Questioned Contract

Part 3: FORENSIC TECHNIQUESInternational audienceThis paper presents a systematic process for describing digital forensic investigations. It focuses on forensic goals and anti-forensic obstacles and their operationalization in terms of human and software actions. The paper also demonstrates how the process can be used to capture the various forensic and anti-forensic aspects of a real-world case involving document forgery

Drawing, Handwriting Processing Analysis: New Advances and Challenges

International audienceDrawing and handwriting are communicational skills that are fundamental in geopolitical, ideological and technological evolutions of all time. drawingand handwriting are still useful in defining innovative applications in numerous fields. In this regard, researchers have to solve new problems like those related to the manner in which drawing and handwriting become an efficient way to command various connected objects; or to validate graphomotor skills as evident and objective sources of data useful in the study of human beings, their capabilities and their limits from birth to decline

Analysis of Selected Methods Used in Forensic Paper-Based Document Examination

The examination of questioned documents is a very key part of forensics and the justice systems. This is because fraudsters and other criminals may temper with documents in their criminal activities. A number of forensic document examination methods and techniques have been developed to examine the authenticity of documents. These methods and techniques have advantages and disadvantages. This study thus sought to identify and analyse some of the methods used in forensic document examination. A literature review was applied in this study.  This study concluded that forensic document examination had advanced as it had a number of methods which could be used to determine the authenticity of documents. However, forensic document examination still needed to develop further as some methods being used were destructive and could lead to information loss or the deterioration of documents

Comparison of signature on paper and apple® ipad using multivariate analysis

The transformation of documentation either in legal public or private industry had moved with the digitalization of business around the world in an unpredicted acceleration in last two decades particularly since the Covid-19 pandemic. The Forensic Document Examiners (FDEs) for this study was on high demand to move forward toward digital document examination just like the way they did for conventional physical document examination. Signature, being one of the most socially acceptable biometric traits for the past centuries, has become one of the challenges when a handwritten signature was digitally captured on digital device instead of the traditional paper as writing medium. Most of the previously available research focused on the temporal digital data for the features and characteristics of handwritten signatures. This study aimed to focus on the height ratio analysis of writing zones in handwritten signatures deposited on paper medium and on the Apple® iPad medium when both were treated as static flat images when the digital document was not made available to the FDE. The results indicated that there were differences for signatures on different writing mediums as opposed to the principle of handwriting that the writing zone of a person remained relatively uniform in most of the aspects. The implementation of statistical approaches allowed the handwriting examination being presented in quantitative and objective opinions to the court of law by using %RSD, the k-means clustering, and factor analysis as preliminary study