2,250 research outputs found
FLAT2D: Fast localization from approximate transformation into 2D
Many autonomous vehicles require precise localization into a prior map in order to support planning and to leverage semantic information within those maps (e.g. that the right lane is a turn-only lane.) A popular approach in automotive systems is to use infrared intensity maps of the ground surface to localize, making them susceptible to failures when the surface is obscured by snow or when the road is repainted. An emerging alternative is to localize based on the 3D structure around the vehicle; these methods are robust to these types of changes, but the maps are costly both in terms of storage and the computational cost of matching. In this paper, we propose a fast method for localizing based on 3D structure around the vehicle using a 2D representation. This representation retains many of the advantages of "full" matching in 3D, but comes with dramatically lower space and computational requirements. We also introduce a variation of Graph-SLAM tailored to support localization, allowing us to make use of graph-based error-recovery techniques in our localization estimate. Finally, we present real-world localization results for both an indoor mobile robotic platform and an autonomous golf cart, demonstrating that autonomous vehicles do not need full 3D matching to accurately localize in the environment
AgriColMap: Aerial-Ground Collaborative 3D Mapping for Precision Farming
The combination of aerial survey capabilities of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
with targeted intervention abilities of agricultural Unmanned Ground Vehicles
can significantly improve the effectiveness of robotic systems applied to
precision agriculture. In this context, building and updating a common map of
the field is an essential but challenging task. The maps built using robots of
different types show differences in size, resolution and scale, the associated
geolocation data may be inaccurate and biased, while the repetitiveness of both
visual appearance and geometric structures found within agricultural contexts
render classical map merging techniques ineffective. In this paper we propose
AgriColMap, a novel map registration pipeline that leverages a grid-based
multimodal environment representation which includes a vegetation index map and
a Digital Surface Model. We cast the data association problem between maps
built from UAVs and UGVs as a multimodal, large displacement dense optical flow
estimation. The dominant, coherent flows, selected using a voting scheme, are
used as point-to-point correspondences to infer a preliminary non-rigid
alignment between the maps. A final refinement is then performed, by exploiting
only meaningful parts of the registered maps. We evaluate our system using real
world data for 3 fields with different crop species. The results show that our
method outperforms several state of the art map registration and matching
techniques by a large margin, and has a higher tolerance to large initial
misalignments. We release an implementation of the proposed approach along with
the acquired datasets with this paper.Comment: Published in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 201
Long-Term Urban Vehicle Localization Using Pole Landmarks Extracted from 3-D Lidar Scans
Due to their ubiquity and long-term stability, pole-like objects are well
suited to serve as landmarks for vehicle localization in urban environments. In
this work, we present a complete mapping and long-term localization system
based on pole landmarks extracted from 3-D lidar data. Our approach features a
novel pole detector, a mapping module, and an online localization module, each
of which are described in detail, and for which we provide an open-source
implementation at www.github.com/acschaefer/polex. In extensive experiments, we
demonstrate that our method improves on the state of the art with respect to
long-term reliability and accuracy: First, we prove reliability by tasking the
system with localizing a mobile robot over the course of 15~months in an urban
area based on an initial map, confronting it with constantly varying routes,
differing weather conditions, seasonal changes, and construction sites. Second,
we show that the proposed approach clearly outperforms a recently published
method in terms of accuracy.Comment: 9 page
์์จ์ฃผํ์ ์ํ ์ ์ง ์ฅ์ ๋ฌผ ๋งต๊ณผ GMFT ์ตํฉ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ ์ด๋ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ํ์ง ๋ฐ ์ถ์
ํ์๋
ผ๋ฌธ(์์ฌ)--์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๋ํ์ :๊ณต๊ณผ๋ํ ๊ธฐ๊ณํญ๊ณต๊ณตํ๋ถ,2019. 8. ์ด๊ฒฝ์.Based on the high accuracy of LiDAR sensor, detection and tracking of moving objects(DATMO) have been advanced as an important branch of perception for an autonomous vehicle. However, due to crowded road circumstances by various kind of vehicles and geographical features, it is necessary to reduce clustering fail case and decrease the computational burden. To overcome these difficulties, this paper proposed a novel approach by integrating DATMO and mapping algorithm. Since the DATMO and mapping are specialized to estimate moving object and static map respectively, these two algorithms can improve their estimation by using each others output. Whole perception algorithm is reconstructed using feedback loop structure includes DATMO and mapping algorithm. Moreover, mapping algorithm and DATMO are revised to innovative Bayesian rule-based Static Obstacle Map(SOM) and Geometric Model-Free Tracking(GMFT) to use each others output as the measurements of filtering process. The proposed study is evaluated via driving dataset collected by vehicles with RTK DGPS, RT-range and 2D LiDAR. Several typical clustering fail cases that had been observed in existing DATMO approach are reduced and code operation time over the whole perception process is decreased. Especially, estimation of moving vehicles state include position, velocity, and yaw angle show less error with references which are measured by RT-range.๋ผ์ด๋ค ์ผ์์ ์ธก์ ์ ๋ฐ์ฑ์ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ์ผ๋ก ํ์ฌ DATMO, ์ฆ ์ด๋ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ํ์ง ๋ฐ ์ถ์ ์ ์์จ์ฃผํ ์ธ์ง ๋ถ์ผ์ ๋งค์ฐ ์ค์ํ ์ฃผ์ ๋ก ๋ฐ์ ๋์ด ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฌ๋ ๋ค์ํ ์ข
๋ฅ์ ์ฐจ๋์ ์ํด ๋๋ก ์ํฉ์ด ๋ณต์กํ ์ ๋ฐ ๋๋ก ํน์ ์ ๋ณต์กํ ์งํ์ ํน์ฑ ๋๋ฌธ์ ํด๋ฌ์คํฐ๋ง(Clustering)์ ์คํจ ์ฌ๋ก๊ฐ ์ข
์ข
๋ฐ์ํ ๋ฟ๋ง ์๋๋ผ ์ธ์ง ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ ๊ณ์ฐ ๋ถ๋ด๋ ์ฆ๊ฐํ๋ค. ์ด๋ฌํ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ์ด ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์์๋ DATMO ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ๊ณผ ๋งตํ ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ ํตํฉํ์ฌ ์๋ก์ด ์ ๊ทผ๋ฒ์ ์ ์ํ์๋ค. DATMO์ ๋งตํ ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ด๋ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์ ์ ์ง ๋ฌผ์ฒด์ ์ํ๋ฅผ ์ถ์ ํ๋๋ฐ์ ํนํ๋์ด์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ๋ ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ ์๋ก์ ์ถ๋ ฅ์ ์
๋ ฅ์ผ๋ก ์ฌ์ฉํ์ฌ ์ถ์ ์ฑ๋ฅ์ ํฅ์์ํฌ ์ ์๋ค. ์ ์ฒด ์ธ์ง ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ DATMO์ ๋งตํ ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ ํฌํจํ๋ ํผ๋๋ฐฑ ๋ฃจํ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ก ์ฌ๊ตฌ์ฑ๋๋ค. ๋ํ ๋ ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ ๊ฐ๊ฐ Geometric Model-Free Tracking(GMFT)๊ณผ ๋ฒ ์ด์ง์ ๋ฃฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ์ ํ์ ์ ์ธ Static Obstacle Map(SOM)์ผ๋ก ์์ ๋์ด ์๋ก์ ์ถ๋ ฅ์ ํํฐ๋ง ํ๋ก์ธ์ค์ ์ธก์ ๊ฐ์ผ๋ก ์ฌ์ฉํ๋ค. ์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ์ ์ํ ํตํฉ ์ธ์ง ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ์ RTK DGPS์ RT Range ์ฅ๋น, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ 2์ฐจ์ LiDAR๋ฅผ ์ฅ์ฐฉํ ์ฐจ๋์ ์ด์ฉํ์ฌ ์์งํ ๋ฐ์ดํฐ๋ฅผ ํตํด ์ฑ๋ฅ์ ํ๊ฐํ์๋ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์ DATMO ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์ ๋ฐ์ํ๋ ๋ช ๊ฐ์ง ์ผ๋ฐ์ ์ธ ํด๋ฌ์คํฐ๋ง ์คํจ ์ฌ๋ก๊ฐ ๊ฐ์ํ์๊ณ ์ ์ฒด ํตํฉ ์ธ์ง ๊ณผ์ ์ ๋ํ ์๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ ์๋ ์๊ฐ์ด ๊ฐ์ํจ์ ํ์ธํ์๋ค. ํนํ, ์ด๋ํ๋ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์ ์์น, ์๋, ๋ฐฉํฅ์ ์ถ์ ํ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ RT Range ์ฅ๋น๋ก ์ธก์ ํ ์ค์ ๊ฐ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฐฉ์ ๋๋น ๋์ฑ ์ ์ ์ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ฌ์ฃผ์๋ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Interaction of Mapping and DATMO 5
Chapter 3 Mapping โ Static Obstacle Map 9
3.1 Prediction of SOM 11
3.2 Measurement update of SOM 14
Chapter 4 DATMO โ Geometric Model-Free Tracking 16
4.1 Prediction of target state 18
4.2 Track management 19
4.3 Measurement update of target state 21
Chapter 5 Experimental Results 23
5.1 Vehicles and sensors configuration 24
5.2 Detection rate of moving object 27
5.3 State estimation accuracy of moving object 31
5.4 Code operation time 34
Chapter 6 Conclusion and Future Work 36
6.1 Conclusion 36
6.2 Future works 37
Bibliography 39
์ด ๋ก 43Maste
- โฆ