1,765 research outputs found
The role of pedagogical tools in active learning: a case for sense-making
Evidence from the research literature indicates that both audience response
systems (ARS) and guided inquiry worksheets (GIW) can lead to greater student
engagement, learning, and equity in the STEM classroom. We compare the use of
these two tools in large enrollment STEM courses delivered in different
contexts, one in biology and one in engineering. The instructors studied
utilized each of the active learning tools differently. In the biology course,
ARS questions were used mainly to check in with students and assess if they
were correctly interpreting and understanding worksheet questions. The
engineering course presented ARS questions that afforded students the
opportunity to apply learned concepts to new scenarios towards improving
students conceptual understanding. In the biology course, the GIWs were
primarily used in stand-alone activities, and most of the information necessary
for students to answer the questions was contained within the worksheet in a
context that aligned with a disciplinary model. In the engineering course, the
instructor intended for students to reference their lecture notes and rely on
their conceptual knowledge of fundamental principles from the previous ARS
class session in order to successfully answer the GIW questions. However, while
their specific implementation structures and practices differed, both
instructors used these tools to build towards the same basic disciplinary
thinking and sense-making processes of conceptual reasoning, quantitative
reasoning, and metacognitive thinking.Comment: 20 pages, 5 figure
Polling learning: modelling the use of technology in classroom questioning
This project used an audience response system to explore its value for providing structured in-class feedback to tutors and learners, with a particular emphasis on supporting a tutor's use of questioning techniques. The research was conducted within a BSc Mathematics programme forming part of an undergraduate initial teacher training course. A key strategic aim for learning and teaching development at the University of Wales Newport is to embed feedback as part of the learning experience. This was achieved with the use of âclickersâ, a valuable tool that tutors can use occasionally, or frequently to support more effective and satisfying feedback through question and discussion techniques. An additional element of this project was to model the use of clickers for student teachers in order to encourage their adoption of similar techniques in their own classroom teaching. The findings illustrate the impact on teaching in both diagnostic aspects and in social, classroom aspects
Facilitating Classroom Economics Experiments with an Emerging Technology: The Case of Clickers
The authors discuss how they used the audience response system (ARS) to facilitate pit market trading in an applied microeconomics class and report the efficacy of the approach. Using the ARS to facilitate active learning by engaging students in economics experiments has pedagogical advantages over both the labor-intensive approach of pencil-and-paper and the capital-intensive route of relying on networked or on-line computer labs which oftentimes preclude or restrict face-to-face student interactions. Thus, the new method of conducting experiments represents an added advantage on top of such conventional functions as taking attendance and administering quizzes of this increasingly popular classroom technology.Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession,
Enhancing Feedback: key Issues and Solutions From the Literature to Help New Lecturers in Higher Education
The National Strategy for Higher Education to 2030 highlights that whilst modularisation has allowed for greater flexibility, it has also produced some problems including fragmentation of programmes with large numbers of modules leaving students feeling over assessed and staff burdened (Hunt, 2011). Nicol & Macfarlene-Dick (2006) have argued that formative assessment can promote better student learning and that assessment can be used more effectively by embedding âfeedbackâ and âfeedforwardâ in curriculum practices. Their studies identify how formative feedback does not have to solely come from the teacher, but can also be provided by peers and even generated by the students themselves. The Irish National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (NFETLHE) has put forward similar arguments to enhance learning if we move away from a purely âAssessment OFâ approach and shift towards a more âAssessment FORâ and âAssessment AS Learningâ approach, giving the students a more central role (NFETLHE, 2017). Figure 1 below illustrates these concepts and highlights the dynamic relationship between formative assessment and learning (NFETLHE, 2017)
Digital connection in a physical classroom: clickers and the student-teacher relationship
Education is fundamentally relational, and the student-teacher relationship is central to student learning. However, high-enrollment classrooms, now common on college campuses, limit student-faculty interaction and opportunities for relationship building. âClickersâ facilitate communication in large classes, but there is a lack of research on the potential relational functions of this technology. This study addresses this gap in the literature by asking: How might the use of clickers in the classroom contribute to the student-teacher relationship? Employing a mixed-method descriptive research design, I created and analyzed three data sets to respond to this question: I observed 3 large clicker-based classes, surveyed students to explore their perceptions of clicker use and student-teacher relational dimensions, and I interviewed a subset of students for assistance interpreting the results. Data analyses resulted in four general findings: clickers can be used for multiple purposes and ends; clickers facilitate aspects of the student-teacher pedagogical relationship; clicker communication is not perceived as comprising a student-teacher relationship; and clickers are viewed as a tool for collective rather than individual communication and dialogue. Clickers may have value as relational tools, as they facilitate some aspects of the student-teacher relationship. The frame of the technology may explain why only some relational dimensions are facilitated, and not others. More research is needed to explore how clickers and other educational technologies may facilitate the student-teacher relationship
The Impact of Student Response Systems on the Learning Experience of Undergraduate Psychology Students
Student response systems (SRS) are hand-held devices or mobile phone polling systems which collate real-time, individual responses to on-screen questions. Previous research examining their role in higher education has highlighted both advantages and disadvantages of their use. This paper explores how different SRS influence the learning experience of psychology students across different levels of their programme. Across two studies, first year studentsâ experience of using Turningpoint clickers and second year studentsâ experience of using Poll Everywhere was investigated. Evaluations of both studies revealed that SRS has a number of positive impacts on learning, including enhanced engagement, active learning, peer interaction, and formative feedback. Technical and practical issues emerged as consistent barriers to the use of SRS. Discussion of these findings and the authorsâ collective experiences of these technologies are used to provide insight into the way in which SRS can be effectively integrated within undergraduate psychology programmes
- âŠ