7,564 research outputs found
Cancer diagnosis using deep learning: A bibliographic review
In this paper, we first describe the basics of the field of cancer diagnosis, which includes steps of cancer diagnosis followed by the typical classification methods used by doctors, providing a historical idea of cancer classification techniques to the readers. These methods include Asymmetry, Border, Color and Diameter (ABCD) method, seven-point detection method, Menzies method, and pattern analysis. They are used regularly by doctors for cancer diagnosis, although they are not considered very efficient for obtaining better performance. Moreover, considering all types of audience, the basic evaluation criteria are also discussed. The criteria include the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), Area under the ROC curve (AUC), F1 score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, dice-coefficient, average accuracy, and Jaccard index. Previously used methods are considered inefficient, asking for better and smarter methods for cancer diagnosis. Artificial intelligence and cancer diagnosis are gaining attention as a way to define better diagnostic tools. In particular, deep neural networks can be successfully used for intelligent image analysis. The basic framework of how this machine learning works on medical imaging is provided in this study, i.e., pre-processing, image segmentation and post-processing. The second part of this manuscript describes the different deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), generative adversarial models (GANs), deep autoencoders (DANs), restricted Boltzmann’s machine (RBM), stacked autoencoders (SAE), convolutional autoencoders (CAE), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory (LTSM), multi-scale convolutional neural network (M-CNN), multi-instance learning convolutional neural network (MIL-CNN). For each technique, we provide Python codes, to allow interested readers to experiment with the cited algorithms on their own diagnostic problems. The third part of this manuscript compiles the successfully applied deep learning models for different types of cancers. Considering the length of the manuscript, we restrict ourselves to the discussion of breast cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and skin cancer. The purpose of this bibliographic review is to provide researchers opting to work in implementing deep learning and artificial neural networks for cancer diagnosis a knowledge from scratch of the state-of-the-art achievements
Physics-Informed Computer Vision: A Review and Perspectives
Incorporation of physical information in machine learning frameworks are
opening and transforming many application domains. Here the learning process is
augmented through the induction of fundamental knowledge and governing physical
laws. In this work we explore their utility for computer vision tasks in
interpreting and understanding visual data. We present a systematic literature
review of formulation and approaches to computer vision tasks guided by
physical laws. We begin by decomposing the popular computer vision pipeline
into a taxonomy of stages and investigate approaches to incorporate governing
physical equations in each stage. Existing approaches in each task are analyzed
with regard to what governing physical processes are modeled, formulated and
how they are incorporated, i.e. modify data (observation bias), modify networks
(inductive bias), and modify losses (learning bias). The taxonomy offers a
unified view of the application of the physics-informed capability,
highlighting where physics-informed learning has been conducted and where the
gaps and opportunities are. Finally, we highlight open problems and challenges
to inform future research. While still in its early days, the study of
physics-informed computer vision has the promise to develop better computer
vision models that can improve physical plausibility, accuracy, data efficiency
and generalization in increasingly realistic applications
A Survey on Causal Discovery Methods for Temporal and Non-Temporal Data
Causal Discovery (CD) is the process of identifying the cause-effect
relationships among the variables from data. Over the years, several methods
have been developed primarily based on the statistical properties of data to
uncover the underlying causal mechanism. In this study we introduce the common
terminologies in causal discovery, and provide a comprehensive discussion of
the approaches designed to identify the causal edges in different settings. We
further discuss some of the benchmark datasets available for evaluating the
performance of the causal discovery algorithms, available tools to perform
causal discovery readily, and the common metrics used to evaluate these
methods. Finally, we conclude by presenting the common challenges involved in
CD and also, discuss the applications of CD in multiple areas of interest
Recommended from our members
Method for Enabling Causal Inference in Relational Domains
The analysis of data from complex systems is quickly becoming a fundamental aspect of modern business, government, and science. The field of causal learning is concerned with developing a set of statistical methods that allow practitioners make inferences about unseen interventions. This field has seen significant advances in recent years. However, the vast majority of this work assumes that data instances are independent, whereas many systems are best described in terms of interconnected instances, i.e. relational systems. This discrepancy prevents causal inference techniques from being reliably applied in many real-world settings. In this thesis, I will present three contributions to the field of causal inference that seek to enable the analysis of relational systems. First, I will present theory for consistently testing statistical dependence in relational domains. I then show how the significance of this test can be measured in practice using a novel bootstrap method for structured domains. Second, I show that statistical dependence in relational domains is inherently asymmetric, implying a simple test of causal direction from observational data. This test requires no assumptions on either the marginal distributions of variables or the functional form of dependence. Third, I describe relational causal adjustment, a procedure to identify the effects of arbitrary interventions from observational relational data via an extension of Pearl\u27s backdoor criterion. A series of evaluations on synthetic domains shows the estimates obtained by relational causal adjustment are close to those obtained from explicit experimentation
Active and Passive Causal Inference Learning
This paper serves as a starting point for machine learning researchers,
engineers and students who are interested in but not yet familiar with causal
inference. We start by laying out an important set of assumptions that are
collectively needed for causal identification, such as exchangeability,
positivity, consistency and the absence of interference. From these
assumptions, we build out a set of important causal inference techniques, which
we do so by categorizing them into two buckets; active and passive approaches.
We describe and discuss randomized controlled trials and bandit-based
approaches from the active category. We then describe classical approaches,
such as matching and inverse probability weighting, in the passive category,
followed by more recent deep learning based algorithms. By finishing the paper
with some of the missing aspects of causal inference from this paper, such as
collider biases, we expect this paper to provide readers with a diverse set of
starting points for further reading and research in causal inference and
discovery
A Survey on Causal Reinforcement Learning
While Reinforcement Learning (RL) achieves tremendous success in sequential
decision-making problems of many domains, it still faces key challenges of data
inefficiency and the lack of interpretability. Interestingly, many researchers
have leveraged insights from the causality literature recently, bringing forth
flourishing works to unify the merits of causality and address well the
challenges from RL. As such, it is of great necessity and significance to
collate these Causal Reinforcement Learning (CRL) works, offer a review of CRL
methods, and investigate the potential functionality from causality toward RL.
In particular, we divide existing CRL approaches into two categories according
to whether their causality-based information is given in advance or not. We
further analyze each category in terms of the formalization of different
models, ranging from the Markov Decision Process (MDP), Partially Observed
Markov Decision Process (POMDP), Multi-Arm Bandits (MAB), and Dynamic Treatment
Regime (DTR). Moreover, we summarize the evaluation matrices and open sources
while we discuss emerging applications, along with promising prospects for the
future development of CRL.Comment: 29 pages, 20 figure
- …