Oblivious buy-at-bulk network design algorithms

Large-scale networks such as the Internet has emerged as arguably the most complex distributed communication network system. The mere size of such networks and all the various applications that run on it brings a large variety of challenging problems. Similar problems lie in any network - transportation, logistics, oil/gas pipeline etc where efficient paths are needed to route the flow of demands. This dissertation studies the computation of efficient paths from the demand sources to their respective destination(s). We consider the buy-at-bulk network design problem in which we wish to compute efficient paths for carrying demands from a set of source nodes to a set of destination nodes. In designing networks, it is important to realize economies of scale. This is can be achieved by aggregating the flow of demands. We want the routing to be oblivious: no matter how many source nodes are there and no matter where they are in the network, the demands from the sources has to be routed in a near-optimal fashion. Moreover, we want the aggregation function f to be unknown, assuming that it is a concave function of the total flow on the edge. The total cost of a solution is determined by the amount of demand routed through each edge. We address questions such as how we can (obliviously) route flows and get competitive algorithms for this problem. We study the approximability of the resulting buy-at-bulk network design problem. Our aim is to _x000C_find minimum-cost paths for all the demands to the sink(s) under two assumptions: (1) The demand set is unknown, that is, the number of source nodes that has demand to send is unknown. (2) The aggregation cost function at intermediate edges is also unknown. We consider di_x000B_fferent types of graphs (doubling-dimension, planar and minor-free) and provide approximate solutions for each of them. For the case of doubling graphs and minor-free graphs, we construct a single spanning tree for the single-source buy-at-bulk network design problem. For the case of planar graphs, we have built a set of paths with an asymptotically tight competitive ratio

Split and join: strong partitions and Universal Steiner trees for graphs

We study the problem of constructing universal Steiner trees for undirected graphs. Given a graph G and a root node r, we seek a single spanning tree T of minimum stretch, where the stretch of T is defined to be the maximum ratio, over all subsets of terminals X, of the ratio of the cost of the sub-tree TX that connects r to X to the cost of an optimal Steiner tree connecting X to r. Universal Steiner trees (USTs) are important for data aggregation problems where computing the Steiner tree from scratch for every input instance of terminals is costly, as for example in low energy sensor network applications. We provide a polynomial time UST construction for general graphs with 2O(√log n)-stretch. We also give a polynomial time polylogarithmic-stretch construction for minor-free graphs. One basic building block in our algorithm is a hierarchy of graph partitions, each of which guarantees small strong cluster diameter and bounded local neighbourhood intersections. Our partition hierarchy for minor-free graphs is based on the solution to a cluster aggregation problem that may be of independent interest. To our knowledge, this is the first sub-linear UST result for general graphs, and the first polylogarithmic construction for minor-free graphs

Node-weighted Steiner tree and group Steiner tree in planar graphs

We improve the approximation ratios for two optimization problems in planar graphs. For node-weighted Steiner tree, a classical network-optimization problem, the best achievable approximation ratio in general graphs is Θ [theta] (logn), and nothing better was previously known for planar graphs. We give a constant-factor approximation for planar graphs. Our algorithm generalizes to allow as input any nontrivial minor-closed graph family, and also generalizes to address other optimization problems such as Steiner forest, prize-collecting Steiner tree, and network-formation games. The second problem we address is group Steiner tree: given a graph with edge weights and a collection of groups (subsets of nodes), find a minimum-weight connected subgraph that includes at least one node from each group. The best approximation ratio known in general graphs is O(log3 [superscript 3] n), or O(log2 [superscript 2] n) when the host graph is a tree. We obtain an O(log n polyloglog n) approximation algorithm for the special case where the graph is planar embedded and each group is the set of nodes on a face. We obtain the same approximation ratio for the minimum-weight tour that must visit each group

When the Optimum is also Blind: a New Perspective on Universal Optimization

Consider the following variant of the set cover problem. We are given a universe U={1,...,n} and a collection of subsets C = {S_1,...,S_m} where each S_i is a subset of U. For every element u from U we need to find a set phi(u) from collection C such that u belongs to phi(u). Once we construct and fix the mapping phi from U to C a subset X from the universe U is revealed, and we need to cover all elements from X with exactly phi(X), that is {phi(u)}_{all u from X}. The goal is to find a mapping such that the cover phi(X) is as cheap as possible. This is an example of a universal problem where the solution has to be created before the actual instance to deal with is revealed. Such problems appear naturally in some settings when we need to optimize under uncertainty and it may be actually too expensive to begin finding a good solution once the input starts being revealed. A rich body of work was devoted to investigate such problems under the regime of worst case analysis, i.e., when we measure how good the solution is by looking at the worst-case ratio: universal solution for a given instance vs optimum solution for the same instance. As the universal solution is significantly more constrained, it is typical that such a worst-case ratio is actually quite big. One way to give a viewpoint on the problem that would be less vulnerable to such extreme worst-cases is to assume that the instance, for which we will have to create a solution, will be drawn randomly from some probability distribution. In this case one wants to minimize the expected value of the ratio: universal solution vs optimum solution. Here the bounds obtained are indeed smaller than when we compare to the worst-case ratio. But even in this case we still compare apples to oranges as no universal solution is able to construct the optimum solution for every possible instance. What if we would compare our approximate universal solution against an optimal universal solution that obeys the same rules as we do? We show that under this viewpoint, but still in the stochastic variant, we can indeed obtain better bounds than in the expected ratio model. For example, for the set cover problem we obtain $H_n$ approximation which matches the approximation ratio from the classic deterministic setup. Moreover, we show this for all possible probability distributions over $U$ that have a polynomially large carrier, while all previous results pertained to a model in which elements were sampled independently. Our result is based on rounding a proper configuration IP that captures the optimal universal solution, and using tools from submodular optimization. The same basic approach leads to improved approximation algorithms for other related problems, including Vertex Cover, Edge Cover, Directed Steiner Tree, Multicut, and Facility Location

Algorithmic Graph Theory

The main focus of this workshop was on mathematical techniques needed for the development of efficient solutions and algorithms for computationally difficult graph problems. The techniques studied at the workshhop included: the probabilistic method and randomized algorithms, approximation and optimization, structured families of graphs and approximation algorithms for large problems. The workshop Algorithmic Graph Theory was attended by 46 participants, many of them being young researchers. In 15 survey talks an overview of recent developments in Algorithmic Graph Theory was given. These talks were supplemented by 10 shorter talks and by two special sessions