Geometric and photometric affine invariant image registration

This thesis aims to present a solution to the correspondence problem for the registration of wide-baseline images taken from uncalibrated cameras. We propose an affine invariant descriptor that combines the geometry and photometry of the scene to find correspondences between both views. The geometric affine invariant component of the descriptor is based on the affine arc-length metric, whereas the photometry is analysed by invariant colour moments. A graph structure represents the spatial distribution of the primitive features; i.e. nodes correspond to detected high-curvature points, whereas arcs represent connectivities by extracted contours. After matching, we refine the search for correspondences by using a maximum likelihood robust algorithm. We have evaluated the system over synthetic and real data. The method is endemic to propagation of errors introduced by approximations in the system.BAE SystemsSelex Sensors and Airborne System

Shape description and matching using integral invariants on eccentricity transformed images

Matching occluded and noisy shapes is a problem frequently encountered in medical image analysis and more generally in computer vision. To keep track of changes inside the breast, for example, it is important for a computer aided detection system to establish correspondences between regions of interest. Shape transformations, computed both with integral invariants (II) and with geodesic distance, yield signatures that are invariant to isometric deformations, such as bending and articulations. Integral invariants describe the boundaries of planar shapes. However, they provide no information about where a particular feature lies on the boundary with regard to the overall shape structure. Conversely, eccentricity transforms (Ecc) can match shapes by signatures of geodesic distance histograms based on information from inside the shape; but they ignore the boundary information. We describe a method that combines the boundary signature of a shape obtained from II and structural information from the Ecc to yield results that improve on them separately

Vision-Based Object Recognition and 3-D Pose Estimation Using Conic Features

This thesis deals with monocular vision-based object recognition and 3-D pose estimation based on conic features. Conic features including circles and ellipses are frequently observed in many man-made objects in real word as well as have the merit of robustness potentially in feature extraction in vision-based applications. Although the 3-D pose estimation problem of conic features in 3-D space has been studied well since 1990, the previous work has not provided a unique solution completely for full 3-D pose parameters (i.e., 3-orientations and 3-positions) due to complexity from high nonlinearity of a general conic. This thesis, therefore, renews conic features in a new perspective on geometric invariants in both 3-D space and 2-D projective space, incorporating other geometric features with conics. First, as the most essential step in dealing with conics, this thesis shows that the pose parameters of a circular feature in 3-D space can be derived analytically from incorporating a coplanar point. A procedure of pose parameter recovery is described in detail, and its performance is evaluated and discussed in view of pose estimation errors and sensitivity. Second, it is also revealed that the pose of an elliptic feature can be resolved when two coplanar points are incorporated on the basis of the polarity of two points for a conic in 2-D projective space. This thesis proposes a series of algorithms to determine the 3-D pose parameters uniquely, and evaluates the proposed method through a measure of estimation performance and sensitivity depending on point locations. Third, a pair of two conics is dealt with, which is regarded as an extension of the idea of the incorporation scheme to another conic feature from point features. Under the polarity concept, this thesis proves that the problem involving a pair of two conics can be formulated with the problem of one ellipse with two points so that its solution is derived in the same form as in the ellipse case. In order to treat two or more conic objects as well as to deal with an object recognition problem, the rest of thesis concentrates on the theoretical foundation of multiple object recognition. First, some effective modeling approaches are described. A general object model is specially designed to model multiple objects for object recognition and pose recovery in view of spatial geometry. In particular, this thesis defines a pairwise conic model that can describes the geometrical relation between two conics invariantly in 2-D projective space, which consists of a pairwise conic (PC), a pairwise conic invariant (PCI), and a pairwise conic pole (PCP). Based on the two kinds of models, an object learning and recognition system is proposed as a general framework for multiple object recognition. Considering simplicity and flexibility in object learning stage, this thesis introduces a semi-automatic learning scheme to construct the multiple object model from a model image at once. To utilize geometric relations among multiple objects effectively in object recognition, this thesis specifies some feature functions based on the pairwise conic model, and then describes an object recognition method in a fashion of linear-chain conditional random field (CRF). In particular, as a post refinement step of the recognition, a geometric alignment procedure is also proposed in algorithmic details to improve recognition performance against noisy conditions. Last, the multiple object recognition method is evaluated intensively through two practical applications that deal with a place recognition and an elevator button recognition problem for service robots. A series of experiment results supports the effectiveness of the proposed method, maintaining reliable performance against noisy conditions in the presence of perspective distortion and partial object occlusions.Contents Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3 Research objective and expected contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.4 Organization of thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2 3-D Pose Estimation of a Circular Feature 10 2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.2 Problem formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.1.3 Related work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.1.4 Notations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2 Preliminaries: an elliptic cone in 3-D space and its homogeneous representation in 2-D projective space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.1 Homogeneous representation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.2 Principal planes of a cone versus diagonalization of a conic matrix Q . 16 2.3 3-D interpretation of a circular feature for 3-D pose estimation . . . . . . . . 19 2.3.1 3-D orientation estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.3.2 3-D position estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.3.3 Composition of homogeneous transformation and discrimination for the unique solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.4 Experiment results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.4.1 A numerical example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.4.2 Evaluation of pose estimation performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3 3-D Pose Estimation of an Elliptic Feature 35 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.1.2 Problem statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3 Related work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2 Interpretation of an elliptic feature with coplanar points in 2-D projective space 38 3.2.1 The minimal number of points for pose estimation . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.2.2 Analysis of possible constraints for relative positions of two points to an ellipse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.2.3 Feature selection scheme for stable homography estimation . . . . . . 43 3.3 3-D pose estimation algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.3.1 Extraction of triangular features from an elliptic object . . . . . . . . 47 3.3.2 Homography decomposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.3.3 Composition of homogeneous transformation matrix with unique solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.4 Experiment results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.4.1 Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3.4.2 Evaluation of the proposed method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4 3-D Pose Estimation of a Pair of Conic Features 61 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4.2 3-D pose estimation of a conic feature incorporated with line features . . . . 61 4.3 3-D pose estimation of a conic feature incorporated with another conic feature 63 4.3.1 Some examples of self-polar triangle and invariants . . . . . . . . . . . 65 4.3.2 3-D pose estimation of a pair of coplanar conics . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 4.3.3 Examples of 3-D pose estimation of a conic feature incorporated with another conic feature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 4.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5 Multiple Object Recognition Based on Pairwise Conic Model 77 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.2 Learning of geometric relation of multiple objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 5.3 Pairwise conic model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.3.1 De_nitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.4 Multiple object recognition based on pairwise conic model and conditional random _elds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.4.1 Graphical model for multiple object recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.4.2 Linear-chain conditional random _eld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.4.3 Determination of low-level feature functions for multiple object recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 5.4.4 Range selection trick for e_ciently computing the costs of low-level feature functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 5.4.5 Evaluation of observation sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4.6 Object recognition based on hierarchical CRF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.5 Geometric alignment algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 5.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 6 Application to Place Recognition for Service Robots 105 6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1.2 Problem statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 6.2 Feature extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.2.1 Detection of 2-D geometric shapes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.2.2 Examples of shape feature extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 6.3 Object modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 6.3.1 A place model that describes multiple landmark objects . . . . . . . . 112 6.3.2 Pairwise conic model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 6.3.3 Incorporation of non-conic features with a pairwise conic model . . . . 114 6.4 Place learning and recognition system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 6.4.1 HCRF-based recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 6.5 Experiment results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.5.1 Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.5.2 Performance evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 6.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 7 Application to Elevator Button Recognition 136 7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 7.1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 7.1.2 Problem statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 7.1.3 Related work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 7.2 Object modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 7.2.1 Geometric model for multiple button objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 7.2.2 Pairwise conic model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 7.3 Learning and recognition system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 7.3.1 Button object learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 7.3.2 CRF-based recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 7.4 Experiment results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 7.4.1 Experimental setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 7.4.2 Performance evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 7.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 8 Concluding remarks 159 8.1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 8.2 Further work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 References 161 Summary (in Korean) 16

Object classification methods for application in FPGA based vehicle video detector

The paper presents a discussion of properties of object classification methods utilized in processing video streams from a camera. Methods based on feature extraction, model fitting and invariant determination are evaluated. Petri nets are used for modelling the processing flow. Data objects and transitions are defined which are suitable for efficient implementation in FPGA circuits. Processing characteristics and problems of the implementations are shown. An invariant based method is assessed as most suitable for application in a vehicle video detector

Automatic visual recognition using parallel machines

Invariant features and quick matching algorithms are two major concerns in the area of automatic visual recognition. The former reduces the size of an established model database, and the latter shortens the computation time. This dissertation, will discussed both line invariants under perspective projection and parallel implementation of a dynamic programming technique for shape recognition. The feasibility of using parallel machines can be demonstrated through the dramatically reduced time complexity. In this dissertation, our algorithms are implemented on the AP1000 MIMD parallel machines. For processing an object with a features, the time complexity of the proposed parallel algorithm is O(n), while that of a uniprocessor is O(n2). The two applications, one for shape matching and the other for chain-code extraction, are used in order to demonstrate the usefulness of our methods. Invariants from four general lines under perspective projection are also discussed in here. In contrast to the approach which uses the epipolar geometry, we investigate the invariants under isotropy subgroups. Theoretically speaking, two independent invariants can be found for four general lines in 3D space. In practice, we show how to obtain these two invariants from the projective images of four general lines without the need of camera calibration. A projective invariant recognition system based on a hypothesis-generation-testing scheme is run on the hypercube parallel architecture. Object recognition is achieved by matching the scene projective invariants to the model projective invariants, called transfer. Then a hypothesis-generation-testing scheme is implemented on the hypercube parallel architecture

Purposive three-dimensional reconstruction by means of a controlled environment

Retrieving 3D data using imaging devices is a relevant task for many applications in medical imaging, surveillance, industrial quality control, and others. As soon as we gain procedural control over parameters of the imaging device, we encounter the necessity of well-defined reconstruction goals and we need methods to achieve them. Hence, we enter next-best-view planning. In this work, we present a formalization of the abstract view planning problem and deal with different planning aspects, whereat we focus on using an intensity camera without active illumination. As one aspect of view planning, employing a controlled environment also provides the planning and reconstruction methods with additional information. We incorporate the additional knowledge of camera parameters into the Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi method used for feature tracking. The resulting Guided KLT tracking method benefits from a constrained optimization space and yields improved accuracy while regarding the uncertainty of the additional input. Serving other planning tasks dealing with known objects, we propose a method for coarse registration of 3D surface triangulations. By the means of exact surface moments of surface triangulations we establish invariant surface descriptors based on moment invariants. These descriptors allow to tackle tasks of surface registration, classification, retrieval, and clustering, which are also relevant to view planning. In the main part of this work, we present a modular, online approach to view planning for 3D reconstruction. Based on the outcome of the Guided KLT tracking, we design a planning module for accuracy optimization with respect to an extended E-criterion. Further planning modules endow non-discrete surface estimation and visibility analysis. The modular nature of the proposed planning system allows to address a wide range of specific instances of view planning. The theoretical findings in this work are underlined by experiments evaluating the relevant terms