Understanding of Object Manipulation Actions Using Human Multi-Modal Sensory Data

Object manipulation actions represent an important share of the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). In this work, we study how to enable service robots to use human multi-modal data to understand object manipulation actions, and how they can recognize such actions when humans perform them during human-robot collaboration tasks. The multi-modal data in this study consists of videos, hand motion data, applied forces as represented by the pressure patterns on the hand, and measurements of the bending of the fingers, collected as human subjects performed manipulation actions. We investigate two different approaches. In the first one, we show that multi-modal signal (motion, finger bending and hand pressure) generated by the action can be decomposed into a set of primitives that can be seen as its building blocks. These primitives are used to define 24 multi-modal primitive features. The primitive features can in turn be used as an abstract representation of the multi-modal signal and employed for action recognition. In the latter approach, the visual features are extracted from the data using a pre-trained image classification deep convolutional neural network. The visual features are subsequently used to train the classifier. We also investigate whether adding data from other modalities produces a statistically significant improvement in the classifier performance. We show that both approaches produce a comparable performance. This implies that image-based methods can successfully recognize human actions during human-robot collaboration. On the other hand, in order to provide training data for the robot so it can learn how to perform object manipulation actions, multi-modal data provides a better alternative

The implications of embodiment for behavior and cognition: animal and robotic case studies

In this paper, we will argue that if we want to understand the function of the brain (or the control in the case of robots), we must understand how the brain is embedded into the physical system, and how the organism interacts with the real world. While embodiment has often been used in its trivial meaning, i.e. 'intelligence requires a body', the concept has deeper and more important implications, concerned with the relation between physical and information (neural, control) processes. A number of case studies are presented to illustrate the concept. These involve animals and robots and are concentrated around locomotion, grasping, and visual perception. A theoretical scheme that can be used to embed the diverse case studies will be presented. Finally, we will establish a link between the low-level sensory-motor processes and cognition. We will present an embodied view on categorization, and propose the concepts of 'body schema' and 'forward models' as a natural extension of the embodied approach toward first representations.Comment: Book chapter in W. Tschacher & C. Bergomi, ed., 'The Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication', Exeter: Imprint Academic, pp. 31-5

Cognitive science and epistemic openness

Recent findings in cognitive science suggest that the epistemic subject is more complex and epistemically porous than is generally pictured. Human knowers are open to the world via multiple channels, each operating for particular purposes and according to its own logic. These findings need to be understood and addressed by the philosophical community. The current essay argues that one consequence of the new findings is to invalidate certain arguments for epistemic anti-realism

The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialogue on Embodiment and Computational Modeling

Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an amodal conceptual system. Given the established empirical foundation, and the relatively underspecified theories to date, many researchers are extremely interested in embodied cognition but are clamouring for more mechanistic implementations. What is needed at this stage is a push toward explicit computational models that implement sensory-motor grounding as intrinsic to cognitive processes. In this article, six authors from varying backgrounds and approaches address issues concerning the construction of embodied computational models, and illustrate what they view as the critical current and next steps toward mechanistic theories of embodiment. The first part has the form of a dialogue between two fictional characters: Ernest, the �experimenter�, and Mary, the �computational modeller�. The dialogue consists of an interactive sequence of questions, requests for clarification, challenges, and (tentative) answers, and touches the most important aspects of grounded theories that should inform computational modeling and, conversely, the impact that computational modeling could have on embodied theories. The second part of the article discusses the most important open challenges for embodied computational modelling

Learning and Acting in Peripersonal Space: Moving, Reaching, and Grasping

The young infant explores its body, its sensorimotor system, and the immediately accessible parts of its environment, over the course of a few months creating a model of peripersonal space useful for reaching and grasping objects around it. Drawing on constraints from the empirical literature on infant behavior, we present a preliminary computational model of this learning process, implemented and evaluated on a physical robot. The learning agent explores the relationship between the configuration space of the arm, sensing joint angles through proprioception, and its visual perceptions of the hand and grippers. The resulting knowledge is represented as the peripersonal space (PPS) graph, where nodes represent states of the arm, edges represent safe movements, and paths represent safe trajectories from one pose to another. In our model, the learning process is driven by intrinsic motivation. When repeatedly performing an action, the agent learns the typical result, but also detects unusual outcomes, and is motivated to learn how to make those unusual results reliable. Arm motions typically leave the static background unchanged, but occasionally bump an object, changing its static position. The reach action is learned as a reliable way to bump and move an object in the environment. Similarly, once a reliable reach action is learned, it typically makes a quasi-static change in the environment, moving an object from one static position to another. The unusual outcome is that the object is accidentally grasped (thanks to the innate Palmar reflex), and thereafter moves dynamically with the hand. Learning to make grasps reliable is more complex than for reaches, but we demonstrate significant progress. Our current results are steps toward autonomous sensorimotor learning of motion, reaching, and grasping in peripersonal space, based on unguided exploration and intrinsic motivation.Comment: 35 pages, 13 figure

Human and robot arm control using the minimum variance principle

Many computational models of human upper limb movement successfully capture some features of human movement, but often lack a compelling biological basis. One that provides such a basis is Harris and Wolpert’s minimum variance model. In this model, the variance of the hand at the end of a movement is minimised, given that the controlling signal is subject to random noise with zero mean and standard deviation proportional to the signal’s amplitude. This criterion offers a consistent explanation for several movement characteristics. This work formulates the minimum variance model into a form suitable for controlling a robot arm. This implementation allows examination of the model properties, specifically its applicability to producing human-like movement. The model is subsequently tested in areas important to studies of human movement and robotics, including reaching, grasping, and action perception. For reaching, experiments show this formulation successfully captures the characteristics of movement, supporting previous results. Reaching is initially performed between two points, but complex trajectories are also investigated through the inclusion of via- points. The addition of a gripper extends the model, allowing production of trajectories for grasping an object. Using the minimum variance principle to derive digit trajectories, a quantitative explanation for the approach of digits to the object surface is provided. These trajectories also exhibit human-like spatial and temporal coordination between hand transport and grip aperture. The model’s predictive ability is further tested in the perception of human demonstrated actions. Through integration with a system that performs perception using its motor system offline, in line with the motor theory of perception, the model is shown to correlate well with data on human perception of movement. These experiments investigate and extend the explanatory and predictive use of the model for human movement, and demonstrate that it can be suitably formulated to produce human-like movement on robot arms.Open acces

Bio-Inspired Motion Strategies for a Bimanual Manipulation Task

Steffen JF, Elbrechter C, Haschke R, Ritter H. Bio-Inspired Motion Strategies for a Bimanual Manipulation Task. In: International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). 2010